Treatise on the principles and practice of the action of ejectment and the resulting action for mesne profits ... with ... references to the American and English decisions ...

              AUBURN UNIVERSITY
LIBRARIES
Presented by
The Hcward Lamar
Family
.%,
NON qRCUUXMG
tHKUUMP KOW
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2010 with funding from
Lyrasis Members and Sloan Foundation
http://www.archive.org/details/treatiseonprinciOOadam
A TREATISE
PEINCIPLES AND PEACTICE
ACTION OF EJECTMENT.
A TREATISE
ON THE
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
OP THE
ACTION OF EJECTMENT,
AND
THE RESULTING ACTION FOR
MESNE PROFITS.
By JOHN ADAMS,
SERGEANT AT LAW, PAT : PRE : AND ASSISTANT JUDGE OP THE MIDDLESEX SESSION.
WITH COPIOUS NOTES AND REFERENCES
TO THE AMERICAN AND ENGLISH DECISIONS.
By Messrs. JOHN L. TILLINGHAST, THOMAS W. CLERKE and WILLIAM HOGAN.
WITH ADDITIONAL NOTES OF DECISIONS
IN THE COURTS OF THE SEVERAL UNITED STATE!
TO THE PRESENT TIME.
By THOMAS W. WATERMAN,
COUNSELLOR AT LAW.
FOURTH EDITION.
NEW YORK:
BANKS, GOULD & CO., 144 NASSAU STREET.
ALBANY
:
GOULD, BANKS & CO., 475 BROADWAY.
1854.
/
Entered according to the act of Congress in the year eighteen hundred and fifty-four, by
BANKS, GOULD & CO.,
in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York,
Banks, Gould & Co., Law Printers,
144 Nassau Street.
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
RAIPH BROWN DRAUGHON .LIBRARY
AUBURN UNIVERSITY, ALABAMA 36849
*??
PREFACE.
The desire to acquire and to hold property is one of the strongest of
the human feelings. It might, perhaps, be better called a passion : so
deeply rooted is it, so ardent, and so engrossing. To gratify it, hard-ships
are patiently endured, dangers cheerfully and heroically braved,
and even life risked, and sometimes sacrificed. It is founded partly
upon the necessity which renders some acquisitions indispensable ;
part-ly
upon the love of the power and influence which possessions confer
and partly on the avarice which enjoys riches for their own sake.
This impulse is towards all material things : in short, towards avery-thing
that can become the subjects of ownership. But, the more fixed
forms of property, as they are the least perishable, minister most per-manently
to the gratifications and the pride of man, and are suscepti-ble
of being transmitted to remote posterity, are the most highly es-teemed
and the most eagerly sought after by him. This, at all events,
has always been the ca$e in civilized life. The only exceptions to the
rule are to be found among wandering and savage tribes, whose rude
tastes and unsettled lives limit them to whatever is present and fleeting.
From the earliest ages, therefore, exclusive title in the soil has been
among the primary objects of man's ambition. Nations, as well as in-dividuals,
have coveted and sought to obtain extensive landed posses-sions.
Nearly all the wars with which the earth has been scourged,
though ostensibly owing to other causes, were, in fact, originated by
this desire for territorial acquisition. The conquests of Alexander the
Great, ending in lamentation that there were no more worlds to conquer,
might very well be taken for a splendid allegory, truly illustrating this
morbid and insatiable longing of man. The Eoman Empire grasped
after territory until its very expansion brought weakness and decay.
And in more modern times, down to the present day, nations, regard-less
of the solemn lessons of the past, have continually striven, and are
continually striving, to enlarge their area.
VI PREFACE.
It is the same with individuals. Despotic rulers, whose will is law,
have always held, to their private use, extensive domains ; and so also
have the kings and nobility of monarchial governments. Indeed, so
desirable, and so essential to the dignity of their position, has perma-nent
property in land been considered, that stringent laws have been
passed, forbidding its alineation. In more favored conditions of society,
where most persons have a competency, the ambition of men extends
in the same direction. It may be well that it is so. Doubtless, the
wish to possess a portion of the earth's surface is a more healthful and
higher aspiration than the coveting any mere works of art. Certain
it is, that those who have most to do with the soil, as independent
owners of it, are generally most upright, magnanimous, generous, enter-prising,
and brave.
Such being the dignity and paramount importance of this species of
property, the right to it ought to be definitely fixed and zealously
guarded. And so it is. In no branch of the law are the rules more
express, clear, and positive. In none are the principles of the common
law better settled, the requirements of the statutes more explicit, or the
decisions of the courts more uniform or better understood. But, inde-pendently
of the main subject, there are others incidental and collateral
thereto, involving many nice questions, the judicial construction of
which has enriched thousands of volumes of reports, and given rise to
numerous learned and useful treatises.
A good and indefeasable title to real estate is, of course, the founda-tion
of all property in it. As the action of ejectment is an action to
test this title, it is necessarily among the most important of our judicial
proceedings. Probably, no action comprehends more of the wise regu-lations
of laborious legislatures and of the learning of venerable courts.
It is also a very ancient and a very curious remedy. It originally con-sisted
entirely of fictions, and had in it much of the grotesque and even
ludicrous. Although it has settled down into a connected, matter of
fact, and convenient system, and has consequently lost much of its
former character, yet, it still retains enough of quaintness, especially in
those states which preserve the English practice, to render it highly at-tractive.
The work before us, by Mr. Adams, is a most learned and classical
treatise on the history, principles, and practice of this ancient and
venerable proceeding. The book opens with a history of the action.
PREFACE. vii
The successive steps in the practice are then given in their natural
order. The resulting action of mesne profits is next treated. And
lastly are presented appropriate practical forms. We need not com-mend
the work to the older members of the profession ; for, with, them,
its character is already established. It has already passed into the
fourth edition, and is very justly esteemed a standard authority. But,
to those about entering upon the practice of the law, we would say :
obtain Mr. Adams' book, without delay. It discusses all the law of the
subject most thoroughly, in language of remarkable vigor and clear-ness.
It is a safe counsellor and useful companion for the practitioner,
and an unequalled text-book for students. We would add, that per-sons
not belonging to the profession, especially brokers, and others
dealing extensively in real estate, may consult its pages with advan-tage.
The last London edition of Adams, of which the present is a re-print,
comes to us greatly improved. The arrangement, general outline, and
all the more valuable portions of the original work, have been retained.
Parts, however, of the older editions, in consequence of the modifications
that have taken place in the law, having become obsolete, have very
properly been expunged, while other matter has been added, in con-formity
with the existing practice. This celebrated treatise has, there-fore,
now received, as it were, the finishing touches of its author, and
may be considered as complete.
This work first appeared in this country with notes, in 1830. It was
edited by John L. Tillinghast, Esq., who brought to it great industry,
habits of patient study, and a highly disciplined and cultivated mind.
It came from his hands as complete an American, as it had been before
an English book. He had added to it extensive notes of great learn-ing
and value ; for, they comprised the English decisions not cited by
the author, together with all of the American authorities. The whole had
been laboriously and accurately digested, with an eye to direct practi-cal
utility. The talent of the editor, and the enterprize of the Ameri-can
publishers, met their appropriate reward. The work was at once
received with high public favor, and obtained an enviable reputation,
which it has sustained ever since.
The next succeeding editions were respectively edited by the Hon,
Thomas W. Gierke, now one of the judges of the New York Supreme
Viii PEEFACB.
Court, and William Hogan, Esq., an ex-judge of New York. Of the
importance and value of their labor, it is not so easy to speak, since
their ground had already been, to a great extent, pre-occupied. But,
their services, in revising and (as was done by the last named gentle-man)
in re-arranging the notes, and in bringing them down to the period
when their respective editions were published, must have been valuable,
and have contributed in no small degree to its present completeness
and popularity.
From the antecedents which the editor of the present edition of
Adams has had, it is evident that much of the labor which would other-wise
have devolved upon him, had already been done ; and that he has,
therefore, had but a subordinate duty to perform. What he has been
required to do has been to preserve the paging of all former editions
;
to re-construct the index and table of cases ; to carry the numerous
authorities in the appendix into the body of the work ; and, finally, to
revise, with care, the notes, expunging such decisions as have been
overruled, or which, from changes in the law, have become obsolete,
and adding to them all the more recent authorities. He must confess,
however, that this task, simple as it appears, has proved exceedingly
responsible and toilsome.
Thomas W. Waterman.
New York, No. 77 Nassau street, Jan. 3rd, 1854.
PREFACE
TO
MR. HOGAN'S EDITION
The complete exhaustion of that edition of Adams' Treatise on the
Action of Ejectment, which was prepared by Mr. Tillinghast, subse-quently
to the enactment of the Eevised Statutes of New York, and
was happily adapted, by the well directed intelligence and sedulous
industry of that gentleman, to the great modification of our law on
that subject, which had then taken place ; and, also, of that later edi-tion
of the same work, afterwards put forth by Mr. Clerke, with anno-tations
and references to those more recent decisions which, up to that
time, had marked the progress made in the application to the Action
of Ejectment of the principles developed in the provisions of the Ee-vised
Statutes, and in the prescription of regulations correspondent
therewith are facts, which bear the most unequivocal testimony, not
merely to the high estimation accorded to the original text of the
learned author, but, also, to the valuable and acceptable services ren-dered
by the American editors, already named, to the legal profession
throughout the United States. Under these circumstances, and after
careful examination of the last edition referred to, it has been consid-ered
simply an act of justice to Mr. Tillinghast and Mr. Clerke, again to
present to the profession and the public the results of their useful
labors, and, substantially, in the form and manner adopted by them-
X PREFACE.
selves: and to annex thereto a synopsis of the law affecting the reco-very
of the possession, and vindicating the title to real property, which
now obtains in the several States of the Union, so far as it has been
more recently enunciated by the decisions of the respective courts of
Appellate Jurisdiction.
The text is a careful re-print from the latest London edition, corrected
by the author himself; the paging, and the index to the text correspond
therewith ; so, also, does the index to the American notes, so far as the
same are placed in juxtaposition with the original text ; while the index
to such annotations and decisions as are embraced in the appendix,
refers to the paging of this edition.
The additional notes introduced in this volume are presented under
an arrangement differing from that heretofore adopted. In such notes,
the decisions of the courts of each state, on the incidents to the action,
are given separately, with so much of classification, when it could well
be resorted to, as should place together the decisions on particular
points. This arrangement has been adopted, not without hesitation,
because, it varied from that heretofore followed in earlier editions,
which have generally placed the decisions of the courts of all the states
on each particular incident together. But, inasmuch as the action, as
it exists in England, has been essentially modified in its adaptation and
application on this side of the Ocean, not only by circumstances con-nected
with the political and social organization of the United States
—but also by statutory enactments of many of the states, greatly differ-ing
from each other in their provisions, and, of necessity,' producing
correspondent differences between the decisions of the courts of such
states, it must often have occurred, that the array in juxtaposition, of
decisions on the same point, apparently so widely variant from each
other, has conveyed to the mind of the student a very embarrassing
notion of the existence of a complicated conflictus legum ; and of such
difficulties in the practical application of the principles of the text to
the differing laws of so many sovereign states, as to make the value of
such text a matter of grave question.
PREFACE. xi
In illustration of this idea, the doctrine of Adverse Possession presents
itself; this main defence to the action of ejectment is modified in differ-ent
states, by differing regulations as to Limitations ; Champerty ; Im-provements;
for Quieting Title, and otherwise; now, by placing in
juxtaposition with the text, and with each other, some two or three
hundred decisions of the courts of twenty-six states, the laws of many
of which differ on this subject, without giving an explanation of the
modifications which have produced such differences of judgment, the
student must often think that he is groping his way through a maze of
contrarieties ; but, if the leading features of the statutory modifications,
which the original action has undergone in each state, be given sepa-rately
; and be elucidated by the decisions of the courts of each state,
all brought together under appropriate heads, as appendices to the text
;
then, the text and the appendices will reflect a clear and steady light,
each on the other ; then, the practitioner will turn with ease from the
text, expounding the general principles of the action, to the proper
appendix, exhibiting the modifying enactments and decisions of that
state, in the courts of which he is about to apply those principles, and
will pursue his aim unfalteringly to the goal : then, the general student
will compare the text with the law, as modified, in each state, in succes-sion
; and such systems of modified laws with each other ; and will
find his depressing misgivings of a distracting conflictus legum happily
dispersed ; will perceive what admirable harmony and accordance per-vades
that body of statutory enactments, and of judicial decisions,
which, resting on the deep laid foundations of common sense, and com-mon
justice, afford secure guaranties for the protection of the rights of
property, and of person, to the humblest, as to the highest of his fel-lows
; and will ponder his studies with a loftier and juster perception
of the intellectual dignity, and essential utility of the profession to
which he has devoted himself.
In preparing this work for the press, upwards of three hundred vol-umes,
(beiDg all the law reports of all the states, down to this time,
which had not been previously consulted,) have been carefully exam-
xii PREFACE.
ined; and, (studiously omitting all matters which, did not appear to be
of general or particular interest, either as involving some novelty of
application of an established principle ; or presenting some peculiarity
of circumstance ; or settling some doubtful question ; or suggesting
some interesting analogy ;) such selections have been made from the
decisions reported, as justify the confident belief that the law relating
to the Action of Ejectment, as it now exists throughout the United
States, is fully and correctly presented to the profession in the following
pages.
WILLIAM HOGAK
New York, 1845.
PREFACE
MR. CLERKE'S EDITION.
All the American decisions omitted in Mr. Tillinghast's Edition,
and those which have been reported since its publication, have been
diligently digested, and are inserted in the Present Edition. Many of
them will be found essentially important, and all interesting ; as show-ing
the various modifications which the action of ejectment has been
obliged to assume, in order to accommodate itself to the legal and so-cial
diversities of numerous though kindred communities ; each pro-bably
presenting some peculiar characteristics in its foundation and
structure.
The decisions in our own State since the publication of Mr. Tilling-hast's
Edition, are exceedingly interesting to the profession. Most of
them relate to cases, brought in conformity with the Eevised Statutes,
containing principles and prescribing regulations corresponding to the
new provisions of these Statutes ; an intimate acquaintance with which
is indispensably requisite for every practitioner in the State of New
York; and cannot be overlooked by those of any portion of the
Union ; as it is not to be expected that any of our sister States will
continue to retain the useless and cumbersome machinery of the old
practice.
xiv PREFACE.
The present is a re-print from the latest English Edition, and con-tains
improvements, both in matter and arrangement, made under the
diligent revision and matured experience of the author.
In England, the action of ejectment has undergone radical and ex-tensive
modifications since the publication of the former edition; which
have rendered it necessary to make substantial corresponding modifi-cations
in the plan of the work. It
#may then be safely presented to
the profession in its present shape, as the most useful treatise ever is-sued
from the American Press on the subject to which it relates.
T. W. 0.
New York, Dec. 1839.
PREFACE
TO
ME. TILLINGHAST'S EDITION.
Mr. Adams' valuable Treatise on the Action of Ejectment being
nearly out of print, and the Revised Statutes of New York having
made numerous and important changes in the form and effect of that
Action, it was believed that a new Edition of Mr. Adams' Work,
with Notes adapted to the Revised Statutes, and with Eeferences to the
Decisions of the American Courts on the subject of Ejectment, and to
those made in the English Courts since the publication of the last
Edition of Mr. Adams' Treatise, would prove useful. Under that be-lief,
the present Edition has been prepared and published.
The Text of this Edition has been carefully re-printed from the Text
of a former Edition of Mr. Adams' Work, published in this country
several years since, with notes and references to some of the American
Eeports, by Philo Euggles, Esq. With the paging of that Edition,
the paging of the present has been made to correspond, in order to
preserve uniformity in references ; but no further or other use has been
made of it, than is here mentioned.
It will be seen, upon examination, that all Mr. Adams' Treatise, in_
eluding his Appendix, Index, Table of Cases, &c, is re-published in
XVl PREFACE.
this Edition, entire. The additions now made, consist of Notes of
American Decisions, extracted from the Eeports of Cases in the Courts
of the United States, and in those of all the States in which Eeports
have been published ; Notes of Decisions made in the English Courts,
since the publication of Mr. Adams' third Edition, and some few of
previous dates which had not been referred to in the Text ; a Sum-mary
of the provisions of the Statutes of Limitations of the several
States, so far as they relate to Eights of Entry, and to Actions for the
recovery of Land ; the Statutory Provisions of the State of New York,
in relation to Actions of Ejectment; A collection of Eorms in Eject-ment,
adapted to the Revised Statutes of New York, the most of which
have been sanctioned by the Supreme Court, and inserted, as Prece-dents,
in the Appendix to their Eules ; A Digest of Judicial Decisions
in relation to the Doctrine of " Adverse Possession ;" Tables of English
and American Cases cited, and Tables of English and American Ee-ports
examined in preparing this Edition ; A Table of Abbreviations
;
and an Index of the additional matters contained in the present Work.
"With a hope that it may serve to economize the time and labor of
whomsoever may consult it, this volume is now presented to the Public.
Albany, November, 1830.
PREFACE
FOURTH ENGLISH EDITION.
Upwards of thirty years have elapsed since the Author first offered
this Treatise to the Profession—an eventful period in the history of
English Law. And it is a remarkable fact, that whilst the entire
practical machinery in every other action has been reconstructed, and
the rules for pleading remodelled, the proceedings in the action of
Ejectment have remained unaltered ; a circumstance probably to be
attributed to the anomalous nature of the action, which gives to the
Courts at all times an uncontrolled power of regulating its proceedings
and supplying its deficiencies.
Two important statutes connected with the subject of this Treatise,
namely, stat. 3 & 4 Wm. 4, c. 27, " for the Limitation of Actions and
Suits relating to Real Property," and stat. 3 & 4 Wm. 4, c. 74, " for
the Abolition of Pines and Recoveries," have however received the
sanction of Parliament since the publication of the third edition : the
first part of the chapter which treats of the Title Necessary to Sup-port
the Action has, in consequence, been re-written, and the chapter
relating to Actual Entry omitted.
Material alterations have also been made in that part of the chapter
upon Evidence, which relates to the proof of the due execution of
B
xviii PREFACE.
Wills ; so as to adapt it to the provisions of the stat. 7 Wm. 4, and 1
Vict. c. 26, sec. 10 ; and the chapter upon the stat. 1 Geo. 4, c. 87, and
stat. 1 "Wm. 4, c. 70, for Eegulating the Action of Ejectment as be-tween
Landlord and Tenant, which were scarcely in operation at the
time of the publication of the last edition, has been much enlarged.
The practical part of the Work has also been completely revised, and
an attempt has been made to classify and reduce to order the numer-ous
and sometimes apparently inconsistent decisions, relating to an
important branch of the practical proceedings, namely, the Service of
the Declaration, and the Eule for Judgment against the Casual
Ejector.
1 Serjeants' Inn, Chancery Lane,
June 1, 1846.
PREFACE
FIRST ENGLISH EDITION.
It has been the Author's chief endeavor, in the following pages, to
investigate the principles upon which the remedy by ejectment is
founded ; to point out concisely the different changes which the action
has undergone ; and to give a full and useful detail of the practical pro-ceedings
by which it is at this time conducted. To this end the later
decisions have been very fully considered ; whilst a slight mention only
has been made of the more ancient cases, now, for the most part, indi-rectly
overruled, or altogether inapplicable to the modern practice.
Before the time of Loed Mansfield, indeed, no regular system
seems to have been formed for the government of the action ; and that
illustrious Judge, considering an ejectment as a fiction invented for the
purposes of individual justice, endeavored to mould it into an equita-ble
remedy, and to regulate it by maxims, in some degree independ-ent
of the general rules of law, as well as of the practice in other ac-tions.
The erroneous principles on which this system was founded
were pointed out by the late Lord Kenyon ; and a material alteration
in the mode of conducting the action took place from the time of his
Lordship's elevation to the Bench. By his sound and luminous decis-ions,
the remedy has been placed upon its true principles ; and he lived
to see a system nearly completed, which, uniting the equitable fictions
2X PREFACE.
of the particular action with the general principles of law, has preserv-ed
unbroken the great boundaries of our legal jurisprudence, and, at
the same time, rendered the remedy most useful and comprehensive.
The correct principles established by this great lawyer still prevail,
having been unifoimly maintained, and ably illustrated, by the more
recent decisions of the different Courts.
The Author has enlarged upon these circumstances, in order to ac-count
for the personal judgment he has, in some instances, found it
necessary to exercise with regard to decisions anterior to the time of
Lord Kenyon ; many cases being still extant as authorities, which
seem wholly inconsistent with the modern principles of the action of
ejectment.
The application of the remedy as between landlord and tenant, forms
also a material part of this Treatise ; and it has there been the Author's
endeavor to give some useful practical directions respecting notices to
quit, and the manner of proceeding on the forfeiture of a lease ; at the
same time explaining the principles upon which those directions are
founded.
The evidence necessary to support and defend the action in common
cases has also been considered ; and instructions for proceeding accord-ing
to the ancient practice have been added, as far as can be necessary
at the present time.
For practical forms in ejectment, the reader is referred to those con-tained
in Mr. Tidd's Appendix to his Practice of the Court of King's
Bench ; a collection which appears to the Author too complete to re-quire
addition, and too accurate to be susceptible of improvement
5 Serjeants' inn, Fleet Street,
May 1, 1812.
CONTENTS
CHAPTEE I.
OF THE ORIGIN", PROGRESS, AND NATURE OF THE ACTION OF EJECTMENT,
History of the action, ------- 1
Its origin, ------- 9
Ancient practice, - - - - - - 11
Modern practice, - - - - - - - 16
CHAPTEE II.
OF WHAT THINGS AN" EJECTMENT WILL LIE, AND HOW THEY ARE TO BE
DESCRIBED.
Of what things an ejectment will lie, - - - - - 20
How they are to be described, 24
CHAPTEE III.
OF THE TITLE NECESSARY TO SUPPORT THE ACTION OF EJECTMENT.
Of the general requisites of title, - - - - - - 33
Provisions of stat. 3 & 4 Wm. IV., ch. 27, - - - - 47, 98
General restrictive provisions, - - - - - 72
Time for claim by remainderman Gr reversioner, 81
Issue of tenants in tail, - - - - - - 95
Provisions—Mortgages, ------ 97
Personal representatives, - - - - - 97
Ecclesiastical persons, ... - 98
Persons under legal disabilities, - - - - - 98
Of the persons who, by reason of their several titles, may maintain an ejectment, 103
1. Tenant for years, for life, in tail, or in fee, 104
9. Mnrto-acrp.p.. .'-.»-•- 105
ii CONTENTS.
3. Lord of a Manor, - - - - - - 108
4. Copyholder, ...... 109
5. Lessee of a copyholder, ------ 111
6. Widow, for her free-bench, ----- 111
7. Guardian in socage, or testamentary guardian, - - - 114
8. Infant, - - - - - - 115
9. Assignee of a bankrupt or insolvent debtor, - - - - 115
10. Conusee of a statute-merchant or staple, - - • - 116
11. Tenant by elegit, - - - • - 111
12. Personal representative, ..... us
13. Devisee, - - - - - - - 119
14. Grantee of a rent-charge, - - - - - 120
15. Assignee of the reversion, upon a right of re-entry for condition broken, - 120
16. Corporation aggregate or sole, - - - - - 124
17. Churchwardens and overseers of the poor, for lands belonging to the parish, 125
18. Lay impropriators for tithes, ----- 126
19. Trustees, - - - - - - - 127
20. Joint-tenant, coparcener, or tenant in common, - - - 135
21. Lunatic, - - - - - - - 137
22. Attainted felon, before office found, ... - 137
23. Possession, unaccompanied by acknowledgment of title in another person, - 137
24. Persons claiming under an award, .... 139
CHAPTER IV.
OF THE ACTION OF EJECTMENT, AS BETWEEN LANDLORD AND TENANT.
Of the determination of tenancy by effluxion of time, - - . - 141
Tenancies from year to year, ...... 142
Of the notice to quit, ...... 146
When necessary and when not, ..... 143
By and to whom to be given, - - - - 157
Form of - - - - - - - 163
Period of its expiration} - - - - - 166
How waived,------- 176
Of the termination of tenancy by non-payment of rent, &c, - - 182
Of provisoes, &c, for re-entry, ------ 183
Origin and history of, - - , - - - 1S3
What provisoes are valid, - - - - - 184
Proceedings on, for rent in arrear, - - - - 186
Covenants, how broken,------ 201
Who may bring ejectment on, - - - - - 212
How waived,------- 216
Period of their operation, - - • - - 220
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER V.
OF THE ANCIENT PRACTICE, AND THE CASES IN WHICH IT IS STILL
NECESSARY.
On a vacant possession,------- 221
In an Inferior Court, - - - - - - 221
How to proceed, .....-- 221
CHAPTER VI.
OF THE DECLARATION IN THE MODERN ACTION OF EJECTMENT, AND
THE NOTICE TO APPEAR.
Of the declaration.
How intituled, - - . - - - 225
Venue, ------- 227
Demise, ------- 227
Entry, - - - - - - -242
Ouster, ------- 243
Of amending the declaration, ----- 245
Of the notice to appear, ----- 253
CHAPTER VII.
OF THE SERVICE OF THE DECLARATION, AND PROCEEDINGS TO JUDG-MENT
AGAINST THE CASUAL EJECTOR WHEN NO APPEARANCE.
Of the service of the declaration,------ 258
Of the affidavit of service, - - 272
Of judgment against the casual ejector,
Time for appearance,
Signing judgment, ....--- 280
Setting aside judgment irregularly obtained, .... 281
CHAPTER VIII.
OF THE APPEARANCE,
277
278
Who may appear,
Of the consent rule,
- 283
293
Consolidation rule, .-.--- 296
Plea,
- 301
Issue,
- - 305
XXIV CONTENTS.
CHAPTEE IX.
OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE ACTION OF EJECTMENT.
On the part of the lessor.
General points relating to, ----- 308
By heirs, ------ 324
Devisees, - - - - . 329
Tenants by elegit, - 350
Conusee of statute-merchant and staple, - - - 355
Ecclesiastical persons, - - - - - 356
Guardians, --.... 353
Churchwardens and overseers, . - - - 358
Assignees of bankrupts or insolvents, - - - 358
Lord of a Manor, or copyholder, - - - - 359
Mortgagees, ---... 352
Landlords, --.... 3gg
Assignees of reversion, ..... 372
On the part of the defendant, ..... 375
CHAPTER X.
OF THE TRIAL AND SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS.
Of the trial, - - - - - - - - 381
Judgment, ...... 339
Costs, - - - - - . - 39S
Execution, - - - - - - 408
"Writ of error,-.--... 41*7
Of bringing a second ejectment, - - - - - 430
CHAPTEE XI.
OF STAYING THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE ACTION OF EJECTMENT.
Until particulars of breaches are given, ..... 423
Security for costs given, - - - - - 423
Costs of a former ejectment be paid, .... 42*7
When two actions are depending for the same premises, - - - 430
Under stat. 4 Geo. II, ch. 28, - - - - - 186, 197
7 Geo. II., ch. 20, ..... 431
CHAPTEE XII.
OF THE STATUTES 1 GEO. IV., CH. 87, AND 1 Wm. IV., CH. 70.
Of the stat. 1 Geo. IV., ch. 87, - - - - - - 434
1 Wm. IV., ch. 70. 439
CONTENTS. yvy
CHAPTEE XIII.
OF THE ACTION FOR MESNE PROFITS.
Origin and nature of, - - . . . . . 443
Of the parties, ---...„ 44^
Of the pleadings, -----.. 450
Of the evidence, ----... 454
Of the damages, - . - . . . - 459
Appendix of Forms, - . 46X
TABLE
CASES CITED IN THE TEXT.
\Tlie references in this table, are to the pages of the English edition, which will be found numbered
at the foot of the pages of this work.]
Anor ., (2 Chitt. 87) 199
A. (2 Chitt. 171)
(2 Chitt. 172)
185
163, 164
Abbott, "Wilson v. 102 (2 Chitt. 173) 163
Ablett v. Skinner 176 (2 Chitt. 176) 190
Abrahams, Doe d. Biddle v. 232 (2 Chitt. 179)
(2 Chitt. 181)
194
Aekland v. Pring 64 203
Adams, Doe d. Barney v. 150 (2 Chitt. 182) 198
v. Goose 177, 178 (2 Chitt. 187) 193
St. Leger v. 247 (1 Cowp. 128) 310
Addison v. Sir John Otway 160 (2 Dal. 95) 20
Addy v. G-rix 250 (1 Dowl. 18) 185
Aislin v. Parkin 171, 336, 343, 344 (1 D. & R. 435) 326
Aldenburgh v. Peafer 110 (1 Freem. 373) 298
Alderson, Doe d. Falmouth (Earl) v 18, 224 (3 Leon, 210) 24
Alexander, Doe d. Schofield v. 126 (Lofft, 401) 192
Alexander v. Gibson 253, (b) (6 Mod. 222) 165
Alford v. Vickery 89, 94 (7 Mod. 39) 224
Alker, G-oodtitle d. Chester v. 19, 27 (12 Mod. 211) 214
Allen, Doe d. Shepherd v. 77, 154 (12 Mod. 384) 244
v. Foreman 159 (Ld. Rayrn. 798) 284
Harris v. 335 (1 Salk. 255) 312, 313
Alston, Doe d. Selby v. 311 (Salk. 257, 6 Mod. 130) 180
Amey, Doe d. Thomson v. 19, 80 (Salk. 260> 160, 335 (c)
Andrews, Doe d. Palmer v. 50, 260, (c) (Skin. 174) 247
Andrews, Wittingham v. 27 (1 Wils. 130) 310
Anon., (E. T. 1817) 185 Archer, Lamb v. 215
(1 Barnard, 330) 205 Doe d. Rodd v. 97, 98
(2 Brown, 253) 303 d, Hankey v. Snapp 320
(1 Chitt. 181) 193 Argoll v. Cheny 13
(lChitt. 573(a) 183 Arle? ford (Old), Rex v. 18
(1 Chitt. 505; 2 Chitt. 177) 195 Arnfield, Doe d. Fleming v. 226
xxvm TABLE OF CASES.
Armitage, Doe d. Beaumont v. 181
Arnsby v. Woodward 155
Armstrong, Hufl'ell v. 102
Messenger v. 112
Arthur, Tivyan v. 56
Ash, Felton v. 320
Ashby, Doe d. Mayhew v. 156
Ash worth v. Stanley 22
Atherley, Doe d. Hamilton v. 312, 314
Atkins, Taylor d., v. Horde, 286, 299
v. Hatton 258
Atkinson, Grayson v. 248
Attorney General v. Barnes 250
Austen, Doe d. Manton v. 236
Austine v. Hood 312
Awder v. Nokes 56
Aylott, Cole v. 26
B.
Badger v. Floyd 308
Badland, Lackland d. Dowling v. 185, 186
Badmering, Pike v. 253
Badtitle, Doe v. 205
Goodright d. Sandys v. 207
d. Ward v. 230, 293
v. 196,211
d. Murreli v. 293
d. Price v. 163
d. Read v. 196
d. Roberts v. 193
d. Wanklenv. 203
Baker v. Denning 248, 250
Goodtitle d., v. Milburn 265
Doe d. Green v. 89
Harding d., v. Greensmith 205
Harvey d. Beal v. 315
Maddon d., v. White 87
y. Mellish 41, 68, 233
v. Roe 17
Small d., v.Cole 284,289
Whitelocke v. 243
Baldwin, Brooke d. Mence v. 301
Baldwin v. Wine 26, (b)
Ball, Partridge v. 170, 171
Bally v. Wells 54
Balsh, Goodright d, v. Rich 235
Bamford, Roe d., v. Hayley 91
Bancks, Doe d. Bryan v. 152, 155
Barber, Doe d. Crisp v. 2S
Barclay, Doe d. Church v, 316
Hill v. 156
Barefoot v. Fry 309
Barlow, Hig'hmore v. 159
Barnaby, Turner v. 283, 294
Barnardiston, Smith d. Ginger v.
293, 294, 314
Barnes, Attorney General v. 250
v. Buhner 306
v. Crow 28
Doe d. Wollaston v. 239
v. Peterson 21, 23
Barrett, Smith v. - 17
Barrow v. Roe, 194
Barry, Morris v. 166, 287
Bartle, Doe d. Nethercote v. 254
Bartlett, Howard v. 48
Barton, Doe d. Bamford v. 242
Hia-ginbottom v. 43, 267
Threr v. 57, 147
Barwick d. Richmond (Mayor of)
v. Thompson
Bass v. Bradford
Bateman, Doe d. Freeman v.
Bath, Doe d. Rogers v.
(Earl) v. Sherwin
Batten, Doe d. Cheny v. 112, 115
Bawden, Right d. Wells v.
Baxter, Earl d. Goodwin v.
Baytup, Doe d. Johnson v.
Beal, Harvey d., v. Baker
Beard, Chapman v.
Right d. Lewis v.
Beauchamp and Burt, ex parte,
Beauclerk (Lord) Kenrick v.
Beckerley v. Dimerley
Bedell v. Constable,
Bedwell, Thrustout v.
Beebee, Roe d., v. Parker
Belcher, Thunder d. Weaver v. 42,
76, 77, 78, 84, 265
Bell, Doe d. Rigge v. 76, 79, 105, 135, 259
232
230
150
173, 181
309
131, 334
85
275
276
315
257
75, 83
158
61, 63
293
48
280, 296
245
Bellamy, Doe d. Burrell v
Bengo, Sleabourne v.
Benion, Legg d. Scott v.
Bennett, Doe d. Bailey v.
Lucy v.
Bennington v. Goodtitle
Benson, Doe d. Hall v.
Benson, Pleasant d. Hayton v.
Bent, Worrall v.
Bentley, Throgmorton d. Fairfax v
Berkeley Peerage Case
Berrey v. Lindley
Bery, King v.
Bethill, Floyd v.
Bettison v. Bromley
Bevan. Doe d. Goodbehere v.
Beyer, Doe d., v. Roe,
Bigland, Hobson d., v. Dobson
Biggs, Doe d. Leicester v.
Bindover v. Sindercome
Bingham d. Law v. GregQ
46, 48, 244
288
92
316
299
21, 22
98, 107
92
288
283
243
106
166
301
251
136, 138
304
221
60, 63,82, 271
21, 24
320
Birch, Doe d. Nash v. 151, 155
v. Wright, 77, 99, 116, 265, 334
Birchmore, Doe d. Willis v. 277
Bird, Doe d. Hellings v. 69
Wetherell v.
Bird v. Snell
Birkbeck v. Hughes
Bishop v. Howard
Blackman, Goodwin v.
Blades, Harrison v.
Blair, Roe d., v. Street
Blakey, Clayton v. 1
Blanshard, Fenn d., v. Wood
Blencowe, Crusoe d., v. Bugby
141, 142, 144
161
205
79
174 176
242
93, 301
6, 7<
, 84, 135
235
135
TABLE OP CASES. 2Xl£
Slick, Doe d. Colnaghi v. 311
Bluck, Doe d. Morgan v. 300
Boast, Doe d. Topping v. 327
Bodily, Grumble v. 317
Bolter. Doe d. Chawner V. S2
Bomsall, Right d., v. Wrong 196
Bond, Doe d. Darlington (Lord) v. 143
v. Seawell ^ 250
Boner v. Juner 166
Boult, Whiteacre d., v. Symonds 114
Boulton, Doe d. Parker v. 83, 84
Boyce, Rowe d., v. Power 288
Bracebridge v. Buckley 140 (c)
Bradford, Bass v. 230
Bradley, George d., v. Wisdom 305
Bradney v. Hasselden d. Harper 182
Brahain, Goodtitle d. Revett v. 238
Brandling, Doe d. Bywater v. 146
Bray, Doe d. Warren v. 239
Breach, Doe d. Oldershaw v. 146
Brembridge, Goodtitle d., v. Walter 175
Brend, Tunstall v. 165
Brentou, Doe d. Carthew v. 315, 317
Brewer, Doe d. Byne v. 160, 231
d. Onslow (Lord) v. Eaton 132,(c)
Brewster, Hillingsworth v. 16, 218,(c)
Medlicott v. 219
Brickhurst, Ramsbottom v. 256
Bridges, Brooks v. 345
Green v. 156
Briudley, Doe d. Rankin v. 331
Britain, Doe d. Coleman v. 50
British Museum (Trustees.) White v.
248, 249
Brittle v. Dade 229
Britts, Hunter v. 344
Broad, Doe d. Winnal v. 244
Broderick v. Broderick 251
Brooke v. Bridges 345
Brooke d. Mence v. Baldwin 301
Bromley, Bettison v. 251
Doe d. Fox v. 166
Brown, Doe d. Anglesey v. 327, 328
Doe d, Coxe v. 318
James v. 256
Plevin v. 278
Holmes d. Brown v. 285
Roe d, v. Wilkinson 103
Browne, Doe d. Warner v. 75, 76, 80, 84
Broughton v. Langley 60
Brune, Demi d., v. Rawlins 76, 7 9
Byrant, Harris v. ]56
Rex v. 297
Brydon, Oates d. Wigfall v. 29, 224
Byron (Lord,) ELeene d., v. Deardon
61, 66, 306, 307, 309
Byson, Jeffries y. 336
Buck v. Wright 42, (c)
Buckley, Bracebridge v. 140, (c)
v. Buckley 214
Bucknell, Doe d. Hughes v. 43
Right d. Jeffreys v. 266
Weakley d. Yea v. 29, 30,^)
Budden, Doe d. Isfepean v. 262, 263
Bugby, Crusoe d. Blencowe v. 135
Bulmer, Barnes v. 306
Burbury v. Yeomans 23
Burchett v. Durdant 60
Burghers, Grimstone d. Lord Gower v. 220
Burne v. Richardson 337, (a)
Burt and Beauchamp, ex parte, 158
Burton, Doe d. Haden v. 260
Bury, Phillips v. 228
Butcher, Doe d, Taggart v. 296, 304
Butler, Doe d. Phillips v.
' 104
Cadwallader, Doe d. Rogers v. 43, 265
Carmarthen (Burgesses,) Rex v. 284
Calcraft, Wadman v. 128
Calvert, Doe d. Ash v. 112, 247, 271
Canfield, Doe d. Allanson v. 298
Canterbury (Mayor), Eurley d., v. Wood
98, 107, 170, 171
Capel v. Saltonstall 183
Caperton, Doe d. Counsell v. 36
Capps, Doe d. Capps v. 321
Carleton d. Griffin v. Griffin 250
Came v. Nicoll 236
Carter v. Cromwell 169,171
Doe d. Kerby v. 82
Mitchinsonv. 137
Cartright, Denn d Jacklin v. 99
Cash, Roe d., v Loveless 46
Casson v. Dade 250
Cator, Goodright d. Hare v. 42, 119
Right d., v. Price 248, 251
Cawdor (Earl) v. Lewis 341
Chellenor v. Thomas 19
Chambers, Doe d. Bank of England v. 332
Chamberlayne, Thomas v. 76
Chamier v. Lingon 336
Chaplin, Doe d. Whayman v. 89
Radcliff v. 245
Chapman y. Beard 257
v. Sharps 48
Charnock, Roe d. Henderson v. 103
Charter, Goodright d., v. Cordwent 112
Chaworth v. Phillips 57
Cheney, Argoil v. 13
Chester, Goodtitle d., v. Alker 19, 27
Cholmondley, Roe d ., v. Doe 285
Church, Doe d. Morgan v. 98
Clapham, Holdfast d. Woollams v. 47, 244
Clarke, Doe d. Grunday v. 58
Lockwood v. 138
Spencer v. 321
Clarke, Hinaston v. 259
v. Rowell 173
Smith v. 94
Claxmore v. Searle 283
Clayton's Case IT 8 fa)
Clayton v. Blakey 76, 79, 84, 135
Cleaborne, Jordan v. 24, 25
Clegg, Fursdon v. 33
Clements, Doe d. Folkes v. 45
XXX TABLE OP CASES.
Clerk, Linsey v.
Clifton, Doe d. Hurst
169, 265, 318, 319,(6)
Close's Case 335,(c)
Clymer v. Littler 286
Coates, Nash v. 64
Cock, Doe d. Lord Darlington v. 190, 201
Cockell, Doe d. Iiobbs v. 79
Cocks v. Darson 10
Cole v. Aylott 26
Doe d. Coyle v. 258
Small d. Baker v. 284, 289
Taylor v. 51
Cole, Wade v. 48
Coles, Doe d. Lewis v. 180
Colley, Wilkinson v. 91
Collins v. Silley 56
Sprightley d., v. Durch 194
Comyn v. Kineto 17
St. John v. 21, 22
v. Wheatley 17
Congleton (Mayor) v. Pattison 55
Coningsby's Case 2S5
Connor v. West 21,25
Constable. Bedell v. 48
Constable, Parker d. Walker v. 75, 87
Cook, Ogle v. 252,(a)
Roberts v. 313
Cooke, Doe d. Hardin ge v. 71
Higham v. 178(a)
Cooper, Doe d. Tilyard v. 217
Downs v. 277
Cope, Glover v. 57
Copeland, Doe d. Palmerston v. 283
v. Stephens 50
Copleston v. Piper 22
Copous, Oakapple d. Green v. 271
Cordwent, Goodright d. Charter v.
112, 132,(c)
Corkell, Doe d. Hobbs v. 59
Cottingham v. King 21, 22, 179
Coulthred, Doe d. Daniel v. 236
Cowley, Doe d. St. Julian, Shrews-bury
(Overseers, &c.) v. IS
Cowley, Jemott v. 53
Cozens, Doe d. Cozens v. . 296, 311
Crabb, Smith v. 219
Crawley, Snow d., v. Phillips 257
Creed, Doe d. Cheese v. 52
Davis v. 276
Crick, Doe d. Lord Macartney v. 93, 94
Crisp, Doe d. Taylor v. 46
Crocker v. Fothergill 1
8
Croft v. Pawlett 253
Crofts v. Pick 50
Crocker, Evans v. 178(a)
Stephens v. 178(a)
Crompton, Roe d., v. Minshall 116
Cromwell, Carter v. 169, 171
Crouch, Doe d. Jones v. 141
Crow, Barnes v. 28
Crusoe d. Blencowe v. Bugby 135
Cuff, Doe d. White v. 225
Culliford, Hyde d., v. Thrustout 210
Cuthell, Right d. Fisher v.
Cutting v. Derby
Cutts, Jenny d. Preston v.
Tenny d. Mills v.
336
207
193
Dacre's Case 24, 25
Dade, Brittle v. 229
Casson v. 550
Dale, Hooper v. 161
Dancaster, Lovelock d. Norris v.
216, (5), 217
Daniels v. Davidson 76
Danvers v. Wellington 23
Darby. Doe d. Holmes v. 116
'Right v. 100, (6), 101
Right d. Fowler v. 85, 105
Darson, Cocks v. 70
Davids, Goodright d. Walter v. 151
Davidson, Daniels v. 76
Davies, Doe d. Holmes v. 305
v. 338
d. William v. 138
v. Pierce 236
d. Poveyv. Doe 212,303
Davis, Doe v. 297, 345
Goodtitle v. 205
Martin v. 218
Moggridge v. 341
v. Purdv 177
Roe d. West v. 121, 122
124, 125, 127, 268, 273
Tredder v. 185
Davy v. Smith 250
Dawson, Doe d. Saul v. 300
d. Williamson v. 331, 332
Day, Doe d. Parsley v. 43
Smales v. 69
Deakin, Doe d. Lloyd v. 243
Deardon v. Byron (Lord) 309
Keene d. Lord Byron v.
61, 66, 306, 307
Dence v. Doble 313
Denn d. Brune v. Eawlins 76, 79
Far v. 291
Fenn d. Tyrrell v. 193
d. Goodwin v. Spray 245
d. Lucas v. Fulford 311
d. Purvis v. Purvis 176
Denn v. Spurrier 99
v. White 343
DenniDg, Baker v. 24S, 250
Dent, Savage v, 157, 189
Denton, Doe d. Stewart v. 23, (h)
Derby, Cutting v. 336
(Earl), Doe d. Foster v. 237
Derrett, Kemp v. 103, 104
Devereux v. Underbill 303
Dillon v. Fraine 65
Dimery, Beckerley v. 293
Dinely, Doe d. Messiter v. 307
Hand v. 321
TABLE OF CASES. XXXI
Dingley, Doe cl, v. Sales 136 Doe d. :
Dobbs v. Passer 2ll,(d) d.
Doble, Dence v. 313 cl. .
Dobson, Hobson d. Bigland v. 221 d.
Dodwell v. Gibbs 345 d.
Doe d. Abdy v. Stevens 142 d.
d. Agar v. Roe 197 d.
d. Aislin v. Somerset 89 d.
d. Allanson v. Canfleld 298 d.
d. Antrobus v. Jepson 144, 331 d.
d. Anglesey v. Brown 327, 328 d.
v. Roe 328 d.
d. Armstrong v. Wilkinson 98
d. Ash v. Calvert 112, 247, 271 d.
d. Ashman v. Roe 163 d.
d. Avery v. Roe 327 d.
d. Aylesbury (Lord), v. Roe 193 d.
v. Badtitle 205 d.
d. Bagalley v. Jones 236 d.
d. Bailey v. Bennett 316 d.
v. Roe 190 d.
d. Baker v. Wombell 272 cl.
d. Bamford v. Barton 242 d.
d. Banning v. Griffin 242 d.
d. Barber v. Lawrence 149 d.
d. Baring v. Roe 192 d.
d. Barles v. Roe 203 d.
d. Barnett v. Keen 69 cl.
d. Barney v. Adams 150 cl.
d. Barrett v. Kemp 262 d.
d. Barth v. Roe 208 d.
d. Bass v. Roe 187 d.
d. Bassett v. Mew 173 d.
v. Edwards 261 d.
d. Bath (Marquis) v. Roe 196 d.
d. Batson v. Roe 195 d.
d. Batten v. Murless 256 d.
d. Beard v. Roe 326, 327 d.
d. Beaumont v. Armitage 181
d. Beck v. Heakin 262 cl.
d. Bedford v. Kendrick 107 d.
(Duke) v. Knightly 97 d.
v. Wheeler 150 d.
d. Bennett v. Turner 37, 76 d.
v. Long 33, 86 d.
d. Bennington v. Hall 47 172, 253 d.
d. Beyer v. Roe 304 d.
d. Bias v. Horsley 126 d.
d. Biddle v. Abrahams 232 d.
d. Birch v. Phillips 310 d.
d. Bish v. Keeling 139 d.
<J. Bishton v. Hughes 225, 295
d. Booth v. Field 61,(c)
d. Boulcott v. Roe 196 d.
d. Blackburn v. Standish 314 d.
d. Blacknell v. Plowman 66,(<7) d.
d. Blake v. Luxton 28 d.
d. Bland v. Smith 256 d.
d. Blight v. Pett 166
d. Bloxam v. Roe 165 d.
d. Bracebridge v. Roe 195 cl.
d. Bradford (Earl) v. Roe 326 d.
(Lord) v. Watkins d.
93, 94, 110 d.
183,
Bradshaw v. Plowman
Brenner v. Roe
Brickfield v. Roe
Bridger v. Whitehead
Brierly v. Palmer
Briggs v. Roe
Bristow v. Old
Bristow v. Pegge
Bromfield v. Smith
Bromley v. Roe
Brook v. Roe
Brown v. Roe
v. Wilkinson
Brune v. Prideaux
Bryan v. Bancks
Bryant v. Wippel
Bullen v. Mills
Burdett v. Wright
Burgess v. Thomson
Burlton v. Roe
Buross v. Lucas
'urrell v. Bellamy
Burrows v. Roe
Butcher v. Musgrave
Byne v. Brewer
Bywater v. Brandling
Calvert v. Frowd
Campbell v. Scott
Capps v. Capps
Cardigan (Lord) v. Roe
Carlisle (Lord) v. Woodman
Carter v. James
Carthew v. Brenton
Castleton v. Samuel
Cates v. Somerville
Caulfield v. Roe
Chadborn v. Green
Chadwick v. Law
v. Roe
Chaffey v. Roe
Chandless v. Robson
Channell v. Roe
Chawner v. Bolter
Cheney v. Batten 112,115
Chere v. Smith
Cheese v. Creed
Chippendale v. Dyson
Church v. Barclay
, Clarges v. Foster
, Clark v. Trappaud
, Clarke v. Grant
v. Roe
v. Spencer
. Clothier v. Roe
. Cobbey v. Roe
. Cockburn v. Roe
. Coleman v. Britain
. Collins v. Roe
v. Weller
. Colnaghi v. Blick
. Coopers' Company v. Roe
. Corbett v. Corbett
1. Cotterell v. Wylde
3. Counsell v. Caperton
190,
152,
46, 48,
312,
22
196
198
275
113
196
155
29
87
191
163
192
101
79
155
167
276
66
262
220
94
244
201
267
231
146
86
102
321
325
93
255
317
271
82
327
99
313
192
198
126
164
82
,334
149
52
, 273
316
271
265
234
185
50
190
179
197
50
193
105
311
191
238
230
36
2CXS11 TABLE OF CASES.
Doe d. Courtall v. Thomas 68 Doe d. Fell v. Roe 208
d. Courthorpe v. Roe 200 d. Field v. Roe 183, 190
d. Cousins v. Roe 203 d. Figgins v. Roe 199
97
318
d. Finch v. Roe
d. Fisher v. Giles
199
d. Coxe v. Brown 42, 77, 264
d. Coyle v. Cole 258 d. Fisher v. Prosser 69
d. Cozens v. Cozen3 296, 311 d. Fisher v. Roe 191
d. Crampton v. Minshul 132 d. Fleming v. Armfield 226
d. Crisp v. Barber 28 v. Fleming 243
d. Croley v. Roe 201 d. Flower v. Peck 140, 152
d. Crooks v. Roe 163 d. Foley v. "Wilson 45, 76, 262
d. Croome v. Roe 209 d. d. Folkes v. Clements 45
d. Curzon v. Edmonds 33, 36 v. Roe 183
d. Da Costa v. Wharton 2 8, 42, 47, d. Foster v. Derby (Earl) 237
(6) 51,' 78, 256 d. Foster v. Roe 208
d. Daffey v. Sinclair 296 d. Foster v. Wandlass 126, 301
d. Dalby v. Hitchcock 205 d. Fox v. Bromley 166
d. Dalton v. Jones 143 d. Foxlow v. Jeffries 181
d. Daniel v. Coulthred 236 d. Fraser v. Roe 205
v. Woodruffe 189 d. Freeman v. Bateman 150
d. Danson v. Parke 50 d. Frodsham v. Roe 188
d. Darlington (Earl) v. Bond 143 d. Frost v. Roe 183, 198
(Lord) v. Cock 190, 201 d. Fry v. Fry 297
d. Darwent v. Roe 187 v. Roe 162
d. Davey v. Oxenden 268 d. Futter v. Randall 241
d. David v. "Williams 87, 117 d. Garrod v. Olley 78, 263
v. Davies 338 d. Gaskell v. Spry 139
d. Davies v. Davies 64, 66 d. Gatehouse v. Rees 151, 152
v. Evans 86 d. George v. Jesson 243
Davies d., Povey v. 303 d. George v. Roe 204, 205
d. Davies v. Roe 283 d. Gibbard v. Roe 192, 199
v. Davis 297, 345 d. Gibbon v. Pott 29
d. Davis v. Creed 276 d. Giles v. Roe 164, 326(d)
v. Elsom 134, 140 d. Giles v. Warwick 235
v. Roe 193 d. Gill v. Pearson 167
d. De Rutzen v. Lewis 143, 149 d, Gillett v. Roe 162
d. Diamond v. Roe 185 d. Ginger v. Roe 224
ds Dickens v. Roe 192 d. Godsell v. Inglis 113
d. Dickinson v. Roe 164, 179 d. Goodbehere v. Bevan 136, 138
d. Digby v. Steel 113,255 d. Goodwin v. Roe 165
d. Dogget v. Snowdon 109 d. Gore v. Ross 163
d. Downes v. Roe 204 d. Goslee v. Goslee 238
d. Drapers' Company v. WilsorL d. Gowland v. Roe 164, 327
235, 290, 300 d. Graff v. Roe^ 196
d. Durant v. Moore 328, 329 d. Graham v. Scott 66
v. Roe 197 d. Grange v. Roe 196
d. Edwards v. Gunning 173 d. Graves v. Wells 86
v. Roe 204 d. Gray v. Roe 192
d. Elderton v. Roe 199 v. Greaves 163, 185
d. Ellerbroek v. Flyn 87 d. Greaves v. Raby 225, 235
d. Ellis v. Hardy 254 d. Green v. Baker 89
d. El wood v. Roe 190 v. Roe 164
d. Emmet v. Thorn 256(9) d. Griffith v. Evans 139
d. Erasley v. Roe 199 d. Griffiths v. Pritchard 70, 151
d. England (Bank of) v. Chambers 332 d. Grimes v. Roe 190
d. Erringtou v. Errington 298 d. Grocers' Company v. Roe 211
d. Evans v. Evans 264 d. Grubb v. Grubb 86, 212
v. Moore 201 d, Grundy v. Clarke 58
v. Owen 256 d. Gunsou v. Wr
elsh 234,(e)
v. Roe 130, 162, 163, 186, 198 d. Haden v. Burton 260
d. Eyre v. Lambley 271 d. Hall v. Benson 98, 107
d. Faithful v. Roe 227, 305 v. Roe 190
d. Falmouth (Earl) v. Alderson , 13, 224, d. Hallen v. Ironmonger 61
d. Feldou v. Roe 313 d. Ilalsey v. Roe 197
TABLE OF CASES.
Doe d.
d.
d.
d.
d.
d.
d.
v.
T.
Hamilton v. Atherly 312
v. Hatherly 312, 314
Hammeck v. Fellis 168
Handle v. Roe 201
Hanley v. Wood 18
Hanson v. Smith 253
Hardinge v. Cooke 71
Hardman v. Pilkington 179, 180
Hare 341, 345
Harlow 337, 343
Harris v. Masters, 122, 127
Harrop v. Green, 234
Harvey, 343
Harvey v. Francis 272
v. Oxenham, 34
Harwood v. Lippencott 217
Hayne v. Redlern 58
Heapy v. Harwood 110
Heblethwaite v. Roe 217
Heighley v. Harland 313
Hele v. Roe 195
Helliogs v. Bird 69
Henri iker v. Watt 146
Hertford (Marquis) v. Hunt 115
Higginbottom v. Barton 43, 267
Higgs v. Terry 59, 79
Hill v. Roe 194
Hinde v. Vince 98, 108
Hindley v. Rickarby 274
Hinton v. Rolfe 46
Hitchings v. Lewis 129(c), 130
Hobbs v. Cockell 59, 79
Hodson v. Staple 28, 29, 66
Hogg v. Tindal 169
Tindale 281
Holcomb v. Johnson 107
Holder v. Rushworth 326
Holland v. Worsely 136
Hollingworth v. Stennet 75, 83
Holmes v. Darby 116
v. Davies 305
Horton v. Rys 217
Huddart 343, 345
Huddlestone v. Johnson 117
Hughes v. Bucknell 43
v. Dyball 28
v. Rising 77
d. Hurst v. Clifton 169, 265, 318, 319(6)
Hutchinson v. Roe 190
Isherwood v. Roe 185
Jacklin v. Cartright 99
Jackson v. Hiley 59
Jackson v. Rainsbottom 41, 233
v. Roe 205
James v. Brown 256
v. Harris 175
v. Stanton 235
Jenks v. Roe 203
Jersey (I ord) v. Smith 122(b)
Johnson v. Bay tup 276
v. Lord Pembroke 242
v. Roe 192
Jones v. Crouch 141
v.Jones 76
LSES. XXX111
d. Jones v. Roe 195, 199 204, 205
d. Keen v. Walbrook 64
d. Kerby v. Carter 82
d. Kerr v. Roe 226
d. Kindersley v. Hughe3 89, 110
d. Knight v. Nepeau 243
v. Quigley 75, 84
v. Roe 153
v. Lady Smythe 217, 276
d. Kushner v. Roe 192
d. Lamble v. Lamble 225
d. Langdon v. Langdon 313
v. Law 317
d. Law v. Roe 201
d. Lawrence v. Shawcross 171, 172
d. Lawrie v. Dyball 23(h), 181
d. Ledger v. Roe 211
d. Leeming v. Skirrow 277
d. Lesson v. Sayer 75, 84
d. Legh v. Roe 16
d. Leicester v. Biggs 60, 63, 82, 271
d. Levi v. Roe 206
d. Lewis v. Coles 180
V. Roe 186
d. Linsey v. Edwards 32, 236
d. Lintot v. Ford 296
Lippingwell v. Trussell 298
d. Llandesilio v. Roe 170
d. Lloyd v. Deakin 243
v. Passingham 237, 254
v. Powell 139
d. Lloyd v. Roe 303
d. Locke v. Franklin 219, 231
d. Lockwood v. Clarke 138
d. London Dock Company v Knebell
149
d. Lowdon v. Watson 41, 233
d. Lowe v. Roe 195
d. Lowndes v. Roe 200
d. Lucy v. Bennett 299
d. Ludford v. Roe 206
d. Luff v. Roe 198
d. Lulham v. Fenn 167
d. Lyster v. Goldwin 43, 88, 96
d. Macartney (Lord) v. Crick, 93, 94
d. Macdougall v. Roe 197, 199
d. Maldon (Mayor, &c.) v. Miller, ' 169
d. Mann v. Walters, S9
d. Manning v. Hay ISO (b)
d. Manton v. Austen 236
d. Manvers (Lord) v. Mizeni 90, 276
d. Marjoribanks v. Green 236
d. Morriottv. Edwards 174(c) 175, 275,
282
d. Marsack v. Read 91 167, 234
d. Marshall v. Roe 199
d. Martin v. Roe 199
v. Watts 79
d. Martyns v. Roe 191
d. Mason v. Mason 245
d. Masters v. Gray 293
d. Mather v. Roe 195
d. Matthews v. Jackson 96
d. Matthewson v. Wrightman 95, 96
XXXIV TABLE OF CASES.
Doe d. Mayhew v. Asby
v. Erlam
d. Mears v. Perrott
d. Mee v. Litherland
d. Messer v. Roe
d. Messier v. Roe
d. Messiter v. Dinely
d. Miller v. Noden
d. Milnes v. Lamb
d. Mingay v. Roe
d. Mitchell v. Levi
d. Mitchinson v. Carter,
d. Moody v. Roe
d. Moore v. Lawder
d. Morecraft v. Meux
d. Morgan v. Bluck
v. Church
v. Roe 198,
v. Rotherham
d. Morpeth v. Roe,
d. Morris v. Rosser,
d. Morse v. Williams
d. Mortlake v. Roe
d. Morton v. Roe
d. Mudd v. Roe
d. Mullarkey v. Roe
d. Nash-v. Birch
v. Roe
Nepean v.
d. Nepean v. Budden
d. Nethercote v. Bartle
d. Newby v. Jackson
d. Newman v Roe
d. Neville v. Dunbar
v. Lloyd
d. Nicholl v. M'Keay
d. Norman v. Roe
d. Norris v. Roe
d. North v. Webber
d. Northey v. Harvey
d. Norton v. Webster
d. Notting v. Roe
d. Nutt v. Nutt,
d. O'Connell v. Porch
d. Ogle v. Vickers
d. Oldershaw v. Breach
d. Oldham v. Wolley
d. Orleton v. Harper
d. Osbaldiston v. Roe
d. Overton v. Roe
d. Pain v, Grundy
d. Palk v. March etti
d. Palmer v. Andrews I
d. Palmerston v. Copeland
d. Pamphilon v. Roe
d. Parker v. Boulton
d. Parker v. Goldsmith
d. Parr v. Roe
d. Parry v. Hazell
d. Parry v. Hodgson
d. Parsley v. Day
d. Parsons v. Heather
d. Pate v. Roe
d.'Patteshall v. Turford
156 Doe d. Paul v. Hurst 183, 194
319 v. Payne 215
94 d. Peach v. Roe 183
217, 216 d. Peacock v. Raffan 105
183 d. Pearson v. Roe 164, 184, 217
198 d. Pemberton v. Roe 326
307 d. Phillips v. Butler 104
82 v. Roe 326
272 d. Pill v. Wilson 238
196 d. Pinckard v. Roe 316
92 d. Pitcher v. Donovan 103
137 d. Pitman v. Sutton 142
198 d. Pitt v. Hogg 137
84 V. Laming 136, 141
14 2 v. Sherwin 140
300 d. Plevin v. Brown 218
98 d. Poole v. Ebiington 9
210, 307 v. Errington 9, 166, 161, 282
237 d. Portland (Duke) v. Roe 203
193 d. Potter v. Roe 198
72 d. Powell v. King 213
292 v. Roe 126
200 d. Price v. Price 16
228, 230 d. Prior v. Salter 297
313, 316 d. Pritchett v. Mitchell 41, 89, 233
211 d. Prosser v. King 169
151, 155 d. Protheroe v. Roe 199
196 d. Puddicombe v. Harris 211
29, 34 d. Pullard v. Hilder, 66 fa)
262, 263 d. Putland v. Hilder 51, 18
254 d. Quintin v. Roe 204
15, 83 d. Rankin v. Brindley 331
164 d. Reade v. Read 28
94 d. Reed v. Hawes 254
203 d. Rees v. Thomas 313, 316
76 v. Williams 64, 66
201 d. Reynell v. Tuckett 182
330 v. Reynolds 301
45 d. Rhodes v. Robinson 88
241 d. Rigge v. Bell 16, 19, 105 135, 259
59 v. Roe 163, 183, 191, 193, 194, 196,
199 191, 199, 201, 205, 201, 208, c 26, 330
20, 48 Roe, d. Cholmondeley v. 285
181 Roe, d. Cook v. 221
267 Roe, d. Humphreys v. 305
146 Roe, d. Leak v. 215
242, 254 d. Rogers v. Bath 113, 181
170 v. Cadwallader 43, 265
201 d. Rogers v. Pullen 16
190 v. Roe 164
296 d. Robey v. Masey, 42 (c) 264
142 d. Roberts v. Roberts 186
0, 260 (c) v. Roe 186
283 d. Robinson v. Roe 193, 205
194 d. Rodd v. Archer 97, 98
83, 84 d. Ross v. Roe 191
150 d. Rowlandson v. Wainright, 169
211, 223 d. Roylance v. Lightfoot 39, 44
102 d. Rudd v. Golding 131
48 d. Rumford v. Miller 180
43 d. Rust v. Roe 229
112, 282 d. Sadler v. Dring 159
303 d. St. Julian, Shrewsbury (Overseers,
270 &c.) v. Cowley 18
TABLE OF CASES. XXXV
Doe d. St. Margaret, "Westminster v. Roe 194
d. St. Margaret's Hospital (Gover-nors
of) v. Roe 183
d. Sampson v. Roe 326, 328
d. Sanders v. Roe 325
d. Saul v. Dawson 300
d. Say and Sele (Lord) v. Guy 52
d. Schofield v. Alexander 126
d. Scott v. Miller 114, 151
v. Roe 192, 194
d. Scriven v. Roe 204
d. Seabrook v. Roe 130, 201
d. Selby v. Alston 311
d. Selgood v. Roe 328
d. Shaw v. Roe 211
d. Sheppard v. Allen 77, 154
d. Shepherd v. Roe 168, 190
d. Shelley v. Edlin 61 (c)
d. Shore v. Porter 52, 87, 172
d. Showell v. Roe 201
d. Simmons v. Roe 196
d. Smalt v. Fuchau 274
d. Smart v. Roe 183
d. Smith v. Roe 183, 190, 199, 201
v. Smart 239
v. Smith 246
v.Webber 292, 295
d. Smithers v. Roe 163
d. Smyth e v. Roe 192
d. Snape v. Snape 222
d. Somers (Earl) v. Roe 192
d. Somerville v. Roe 330
d. Sore v. Eykins, 151, 153
d. Spencer v. Clarke 321
v. Godwin 144
v. Reid 226
d. Spicer v. Lea 96, (c) 104, 105, 107
v. Spiller 95
d. Stainton v. Roe 183
d. Standish v. Roe 313
d. Stanfield v. Shipley 159 (g)
d. Stanway v. Rock 37
v. Lord 297, 299
d. Stevens v. Scott 61
d. Stewart v. Denton 23 (h)
d. Stone v. Roe 204
v. Stradling 235
d. Street v. Roe 179
d. Strickland v. Spence 108, 109
d. Strode v. Seaton 238, 292
d. Summers (Lord) v. Roe 200
d. Sutton v. Ridgway 316
d. Syburn v. Slade 66
d. Sykes v. Roe 198
v. Durnford 269
d. Symesv. Roe 185
d. Taggart v. Butcher 296, 304
d. Tarply v. Roe 195
d. Tarrant v. Hellier 44, 244, 261
d. Tatham, Wright v. 252
d. Tattersall v. Roe 164
d. Taylor v. Crisp 46
d. Taylor v. Johnson 132
d. Taylorson, Sulley v. 70
Doe d. Teverell v. Snee 199
d. Thomas v. Roe 185
v. Shad well 313
d. Thompson v. Hodgson 329
v. Mirehouse 303
v. Thompson 37
d. Thomson v. Amey 79, 80
v. Roe 211
d. Thorn v. Phillips 69
d. Threader v. Roe 200
d. Tilyard v. Cooper 217
d. Tilt v. Stratton 81
d. Timmins v. Roe 198
d. Timothy v. Roe 201
d. Tindal v. Roe 197, 199, 325
d. Tollett v. Salter 175
d. Tomkins v. Roe 190, 193
d. Tomkyns v. Willan 64
d. Tonsley v. Roe 202
d. Topping v. Boast 327
d. Treat v. Roe 193
d. Tressider v. Tressider 48
d. Trough ton v. Roe 211 (d)
d. Tuble v. Roe 319
d. Tucker v. Morse 81
v. Roe 196
v. Tucker 239
Tupper d. Mercer v. 191
d, Turncroft v. Roe 200
d. Turner v. Gee 205, 219
d. Upton v. Witherwick 304
d. Vernon v. Vernon 47, 253
v. Roe 211, 293
d. Vickery v. Jackson 142
d. Vincent v. Roe 163
d. Vine v. Figgins 168
d. Visger v. Roe 200
d. Vorley v. Roe 211, 227
d. Wade v. Roe 204, 205
d. Wadmore v. Selwyn 107
d. Walker v. Roe 196, 208
v. Stephenson 253, 312
d. Warne v. Roe 183
d. Warner v. Browne 75, 76, 80, 84
d. Warren v. Bray 239
d. Warren v. Roe 197
d. Warry v. Miller 46(e)
d. Warwick (Earl) v. Roe 209
d. Watson v. Roe 327
d. Wawn v. Horn 69
d. Webb v. Goundry 306
d. Weeks v. Roe 191
d. Welchon v. Roe 202
d. Westminster (Marquis) v. Suffield 128
d. Wetherell v. Bird 141, 142, 144
v. Roe 201
d. Wbayman v. Chaplin 89
d. Wheble v. Fuller 278
d. Wheeldon v. Paul 121(6),(c)
d. Whitaker v. Holls 43
v. Whitcomb 343
d. White v. Cuff 225
v. Roe 191
Whitfield v. Roe 125(a), 204
XXXVI TABLE OF CASES.
209
24.1(b)
163
138
250
112
86
190, 196
230, 293
212
316
332
277
331,
Doe d. Wiggs v. Eoe
d. "Wild v. Ormerod
d. "Willes v. Roe
d. William v. Davies
v. Evans
V. Humphreys
v. Pasquali
v. Roe,
v. Smith 222.
v. Williams
v. Winch
d. Williamson v. Dawson
d. Willis v. Birchmore
v. Perrin 98
d. Wills v. Roe 224
d. Wilson v. Phillips 147
v. Roe 208, 209
v. Smith 196
d. Wingfield v. Roe 196
d. Winnall v. Broad 274
d. Wollaston v. Barnes 239
v. Wright 341
d. Wright v. Manifold 251
v. Smith 293
Denn d. Wroot v. Fenn 229
Donford v. Ellis 335
Donovan, Doe d. Pitcher v. 103
Dose, Lushington d. Godfrey v. 306
Douglas v. Shank 176(c)
Dowling, Lackland d., v. Badland 185, 186
Downingham's Case 46
Downs v. Cooper 277
Drinkwater, Gulliver v. 297, 338
Dring, Doe d. Sadler v. 159
Driver d. Oxenden v. Lawrence 41, 216, 233
v. Scratton
Drury v. Fitch
Duckworth d. Tubley v. Tunstall
Dumpor's Case
Dumpor v. Syms
Dunbar, Doe d. Neville v.
Dunham, Thrustout d., v. Percival
Durant, Potts v.
Durch, Sprightly d. Collins v.
Durdant, Burchett v.
Durnford, Doe d. Sykes v.
Dyball, Doe d. Hughes v.
d. Laurie v.
Dyson, Doe d. Chippendale v.
180
70
129
147
148
94
311
258
194
60
269
28
23(h), 181
126,273
95,
Eades, Gradridge d. Patterson v. 160
Earl d. Goodwin v. Baxter 275
v. Lewis 258
Eastcourt v. Weeks 46
Eaton, Brewer d. Lord Onslow v. 132(c)
Ebrall, Roe d.,'v. Lowe 68
Ebrington, Doe d. Poole v. 9
Eccleston v. Petty 251
Royston v. 21, 24, 25
Edlin, Doe d. Shelley v. 61(c)
Edmonds, Doe d. Curzon v. 36, 36
Edwards, Doe d. Bassett v. 261
Lindsey 236
Linsey, v. 32
Marriot v. 174(c), 175,
275, 282
Palmer v. 135
Elden v. Keddell 260
Eliot, Stephens v. 46
Ellis, Donford v. 335
Roe d. Lee v. 181
v. Smith 248
Elsom, Doe d. Davis v. 134, 140
England (Bank), Glynn v. 258
d. Syburn v. Slade, 41, 233
Erlam, Doe d. Maybew v. 319
Errington Doe d. Errington v. 298
Poole v. 166, 167, 282
Eriswell (Inhabitants,) Rex v. 242, 257
Erith (Inhabitants), Rex v. 242
Estwick, Goodtitle d., v. Way 80(6)
Evans v. Croker 178(a)
Doe d. Davies v. 86
Evans v. 264
Griffith v. 139
Williams v. 250
Smith v. 248
Evelyn, Stonehouse v. 248
Eves, Rumney v. 244
Eykins, Doe d. Sore v. 151, 153
Eyre, Longford v. 251
Mostyn v. 165
Fagg v. Roberts 283(d)
Fairclaim d. Fowler v, Shackleton 69
Shamtitle 12,
215, 216, 218
Fairfax, Throgmorton d., v. Bentley 283
Far v. Denn 291
Farr, Rede v. 155
Fawson, Goodright v. 174
Fellis, Doe d. Hammeck v. 168
Felton v. Ash 320
Fenn d. Blanchard v. Wood 235
Buckle v. Roe 194
Denn d. Wroot v. 229
Doe d. Lulham v. 167
Matthews v. Smart 148
Pewtress v. Granger 234
Thomas v. Griffith 268
Tyrrell v. Denn 193
Wright v. Johnson 238
Fen wick's Case 218
Fenwick v. Gravenor 218
v. Grosvenor 317
Field, Doe d. Booth v. 61(c)
Figgins, Doe d. Vine v. 168
Finch, Ivat v. 236(g)
Drury v. 70
Fitzgerald v. Marshal 23, 25
Fish, Longchamp d. Goodfellow v. 254
Fisher v. Hughes 288
Kildare v. 22
TABLE OP CASES. XXXV11
Fisher, Right d., v. Cuthell 83
Folkard v. Hemet 253
Foot, Thrustout d. Wilson v. 294
Ford, Doe d. Lintot v. 296
'
v. Gray 69
v. Leake 24
Foreman, Allen v. 159
Fortune v. Johnson, 303
Forze, Zouch d. Forze v. 52
Foster, Doe d. Clarges v. 271
Miller v. 258
Fothergill, Crocker v. 18
Fowler, Fairelaim d., v. Shackleton 69
v. Shamtitle 215,
216, 218
Bight d., v. Darby 85
Fox, Mason v. 287
v. Swan 134, 151
Fleetwood, Thornby d. Hamilton, v. 29S
Flood, Goodright d. Welch v. 22(h)
Flower, Right d., v. Darby 105
Floyd, Badger v. 308
v. Bethrill 301
Flyn, Doe d. Ellerbrock v. 87
Fraine, Dillon v. 65
Francis, Doe d. Harvey v. 272, 276
Franklin, Doe d. Locke v. 219, 231
Fraser, M'Kenzie v. 254
Freeman, Right d., v. Roe 197
Frowd, Doe d. Calvert v. 86
Fry, Barefoot v. 309
Doe d. Fry v. 297
Thorp v. 344(e)
Fryett d. Harris v. Jeffreys 152
Fuchau, Doe d. Smalt v. 274
Fulford, Denn v. Lucas v. 311
Fulgam, Molineux v. 303
Fuller, Doe d. Wheble v. 278
Furley d. Canterbury (Mayor) v. Wood
98, 107, 170, 171
Fursden, Moore v. 166, 288
Fursdon v. Clegg 33
Galliers, Roe d. Hunter v. 120, 137
Gallimore, Moss v. 29, 42(c)
Galloway, Goodtitle d., v. Herbert 75,
84, 171
Gardiner v. Norman 158(a)
Garret v. Lister 260
Gascoigne, Hodgson v. 304
Gee, Doe d. Turner v. 205, 219
George d. Bradley v. Wisdom 305
Gibbon, Doe d., v. Pott 29
Gibbs, Dodwell v. 345
Tenny d., v. Moody 60
Gibson, Alexander v. 253(5)
Wither v. 119
Woodcock v. 58
Giles, Doe d. Fisher v. 42, 77, 264
Hill v. 24
Ginger, Smith d., v. Barnardiston 293,
294, 314
Glasscock, Shires v. 250
Glover v. Cope 57
Glynn v. Bank of England 258
Goatley, Roe d., v. Paine 141
Godfrey, Lushington d., v. Dose 306
Godwin, Doe d. Spencer v. 144
Golding, Doe d. Rudd v. 131
Goldsmith, Doe d. Parker v. 150
Goldwin, Doe d. Lyster v. 43, 88, 96
Goodbehere, Doe cl, v. Bevan 136, 138
Goodfellow, Longchamp d., v. Fish 254
Goodgain v. Wakefield 178(a)
Goodright d. Balsh v. Rich 235
Charter v. Cordwent 112,
132(c)
v. Fawson 174
d. Hare v. Cator 42, 119
v. Hart 214, 215, 303
Holton 296
d. Jones v. Thrustout 311
Moore v. 160
v. Moore 321
d. Peters v. Vivian 139
Rowell v. Vice 294
Russell v. Noright 212
Smallwood v. Strother 174
Stephenson v. Noright 128
Stevens v. Moss 241
Waddington v. Thrustout 196
Walter v. Davids 151
Ward v. Badtitle 230, 293
Welch v. Flood 22(A)
v. Wood 284, 285
Goodtitle v. Badtitle 196, 211
d. Baker v. Milburn 265
Bennington v. 21, 22
Brembridge v. Walter 175
Chester v. Alker 19, 27
v. Davis 205
d. Estwick v. Way 80(6)
Galloway v. Herbert 75, 84, 171
v. Holdfast 127
d. Jones v. Jones 28, 66
King v. Woodward 89(6)
Luxmore v. Saville 145
Murrell v. Badtitle 293
Norfolk (Duke) v. Notitle 186
Norris v. Morgan 44
v. North 334, 340
d. Price v. Badtitle 163
v. Puiscent d. Lammiman 174
d. Ranger v. Roe 163
Read v. Badtitle 196
Revett v. Braham 238
Roberts v. Badtitle 193
Sandys v. Badtitle 207
Smallwood v. Strother 26
Taysum v. Pope 320
Thomas v. 307
v. Tombs 336, 345
Walton 22
d. Wanklen v. Badtitle, 203
xxxvni TABLE OF CASES.
Goodtitle d. "Wright v. Otway
Goodwin, Doe d., v. Spray
v. Blackman
v. Longhurst
Goose, Adams v.
Gough d. Calthorpe v. Gough
Gouudry, Doe d. Webb v.
Gower (Lord), Grimstone d., v.
Gowthwaite, Hassell d. Hodson v.
Gradridge, Patterson d..
Granger, Fenn d. Pewtress v,
Grant, Doe d. Clarke v.
Gravenor, Fenwick v.
v. Woodhouse
Gray, Doe d. Masters v.
Ford y.
Thrustout v.
Grayson v. Atkinson
Greaves, Doe v.
Gree v. Rolle
Green's Case I 31
Green v. Bridges I 56
Doe d. Chadborn v. 99
Harrop v. 234
Marjoribanks v. 236
Oakapple d., v. Copous 271
Greensmith, Harding d. Baker v. 205
Gregg, Bingham d. Law v. 320
Gregory v. Henderson 62
Gregson, Roe d., v. Harrison 135, 148, 154
Grey, Thrustout d. Turnery. 280, 311
Griffin, Doe d. Banning v. 242
Carleton d. Griffin v. 250
Griffith, Fenn d. Thomas v. 268
Griffiths, Jones d., v. Marsh 94, 157
Grills, Hussey v. 246
23(A)
245
174, 176
46, 48
177,178
'254
306
Burghers 220
53, 148
160
234
234
218
41, 233
293
69
180
248
163, 185
291
Grimstone d. Gower (Lord) v. Burghers 220
Grix, Addy v.
Grosvenor, Fenwick v.
Grumble v. Bodily
Grundy, Doe d. Pain v.
Guliver v. Drinkwater
Gulliver v. Drinkwater
Wagstaff
Gunning, Doe d. Edwards v.
Guy, Doe d. Lord Say and Sele v.
v. Rand,
Haddock's Case 283(d)
Haldane, Roe d , v. Harvey 28
Hall, Doe d. Bennington v. 47, 172, 253
v. Hughes 160
Keech v. 265
d. Warne v. 29, 43, 337
Warne d. Keech v. 77
Hamilton, Thornby d., v. Fleetwood 298
Hammond v. Ireland 24
Savel 24
Wood 51, 256
Hancock v. Price 22
Hand v. Dinely 321
Hands v. James
Hankey, Archer d., v. Snapp
Harbret, Thredway v.
Harding d. Baker v. Greensmith
Hardman, Roe d., v. Pilkinton
Hardy, Doe d. Ellis v.
Hare, Doe v.
Goodright d., v. Cator
Harlow, Doe v.
Harland, Doe d. Keighley v.
Harper, Bradney v. Hassleden d
Doe d. Orleton v.
Jordan v.
Worrall v.
Harpur's Case
Harris v. Allen
Bryant
Fryett d., v. Jeffreys
Doe d. James v.
Jenkins d., v. Pritchard,
Doe d. Puddicombe v.
Harris, Rex v.
Rolfe v.
Withers v.
Harrison v. Blades
v. Harrison
Roe d. Gregson
Hart, Goodright v.
Harton v. Harton
Harvey d. Beal v. Baker
Harvey, Doe v.
Doe d. Francis v.
Northey v.
Metcalf v.
Roe d. Haldane v.
Harwood, Doe d. Heapy v.
Hasland, Roe v.
Hasselden, Bradney v., d. Harper
Hassell d. Hodson v. Gowthwaite
Hatfield v. Thorpe
Hatherly, Doe d. Hamilton v.
Hattersley, Holdfast d., v. Jackson
Hatton, Atkins v.
Hawes, Doe d. Reed v.
Hawkins, Moore v.
Hay, Doe d. Manning v.
Hayley, Roe d. Bamford v.
Hayton, Pleasant d., v. Benson
Hayward, Roberts v.
Hazell, Doe d. Parry v.
Hazlewood d. Price v. Thatcher
186, 194. (a)
Heakin, Doe d. Beck v. 262
Heath, Short v. 346
Heather, Doe d. Parsons v. 172, 282
Heatherly d. Worthington v. Weston 166
Heaton, Little v. 119
Hesjan v. Johnson 75, 84
Heftier, Doe d. Tarrant v. 44, 244, 261
Hemet, Folkard v. 253
Hems v. Stroud 26, 258
Henden, Smartley v. 159
Henderson, Gregory v. 62
253
320
312
205
180
254
341, 345
42, 119
337, 343
313
182
166
299
26, 178
16, 26
335
156
152
175
240
271
303
140,(c)
303, 308
242
250
135, 148, 154
214, 215, 303
61
315
343
276
241
342
28
110
243
182
53 148
251
312
312
258
254
231
180,(5)
91
92
95
102
Hengest, Jones d. Thomas v.
Herbert, Goodtitle d. Galloway v.
75, 84, 171
v. Laughlen 18
Hersey, Roe d. Wrangharn v. 172
Heydon, Vicars v. 182
Hicks, Roe d. Jeffereys v. 47, 253, 262
Higgins v. Highfield 338
Higham v. Cooke 17 8, fa)
v. Ridgway 241
Highfield, Higgins v. 338
Highmore v. Barlow 159
Hilder,|Doe d. Putland v. 51, 66, (g) 78
Hiley, Doe d. Jackson v. 59
Hill v. Barclay 156
v. Giles 24
Hillard, Doe d. Parker v. 331
Hillingsworth v. Brewster 16, 218(c)
Hind, Seers v. 148
Hudson v. Kersey 252(a)
Hitchcock, Doe d. Dalby v. 205
Hobson d. Bigland v. Dobson 221
Hockhead, Plomer v. 158
Hodges, Wilson v. 241
Hodgson, Doe d. Parry v. 48
Thompson v. 329
v. Gascoigne 304
Mason d. Kendall v. 211,(<2)220
Hodson, Hassell d., v. Gowthwaite
53, 148
v. Sharpe 41, 233
Hoel, Joans v. 24
Hogg, Doe d. Pitt v. 137
Holdfast, Goodtitle v. 127
d. Hattersley v. Jackson 3 1
2
Thrustout d. Williams v. 312, 313
d. "Woollams v. Clapham 47, 244
Holdmyfast, Newman v. 17, 289
Holford, Lade v. 29
Holls, Doe d. Whitaker v. 43
Holmes d. Brown v. Brown 285
Poultney v. 135
Young v. 52
Holsworth, Doe d., v. Hancock 49
Holton, Goodright v. 296
Hood, Austine v. 312
Hooper v. Dale 161
Hopkins's Case 15 8, (a)
Horde, Taylor d. Atkins v. 286, 299
Horn, Doe d. "Wawn v. 69
Hornblower, Peaceable d., v. Read 69
Horsley, Doe d. Bias v. 126
How, Lucas v. 56
Howard v. Bartlett 48
Bishop v. 79
v. "Wemsley 101
Huddart, Doe v. 343, 345
Huddle&tone, Johnson v. 99,117
Hudson, Hunt v. 335
Hufiell v. Armstrong 102
Hughes, Birkbeckv. 205
Doe d. Bishton v. 225, 295
Kindersley v. 89, 110
Fisher y. 288
TABLE OP CASES.
284
.b' UASUS. XXXIX
Hughes, Hall v. 160
Humphrey, Rogers v. 43
Humphreys, Doe d. Williams v. 112
Hunt, Doe d. Hertford (Marquis) v. 115
v. Hudson 335
Hunter v. Britts 344
Roe d., v. Galliers 120
Hurst, Doe d. Paul v. 183, 194
Hussey v. Grills 246
Hutchinson v. Puller 24
Hyde d. Culliford v. Thrustout 210
Inglis, Doe d. Godsell v.
Ireland, Hammond v.
Roe d. Johnson v.
Ironmonger, Doe d. Hallen v.
Ivat v. Pinch
Ives, Townsend v.
113
24
263
61
236,(/)
2 5 2. (a)
Jacklin, Denn d., v. Cartright 99
Jackson, Doe d. Matthews v. 96
Newby v. 75, 83
Yickery v. 142
Holdfast d. Hattersley v. 312
Odingsall v. 25
Trymner v. 248
James, Doe d. Carter v. 255
Hands v. 253
Jeffereys, Roe d., v. Hicks 47 253, 262
Jeffery, Right d., v. Wrong 209
Jeffreys, Right d., v. Bucknell 266
Jeffries v. Byson 336
Doe d. Foxlow v. 181
Jefts, Taylor v. 189
Jemott v. Cowley 53
Jenkins d. Harris v. Pritchard 240
Jenny d. Preston v. Cutts 207
Jepson, Doe d. Antrobus v. 331, 144
Jesson, Doe d. George v. 243
Joans v. Hoel 24
Johns v. Whitley 156
Johnson, Doe d. Halcomb v. 107
Huddlestone v. 117
Taylor v. 132
Penn d. Wright v. 238
Fortune v. 303
Hegan v. 75, 84
v. Huddlestone 99, 117
v. Lawson 242
Proctor v. 303,(d)
Rich v. 263
Williams d., v. Keen 228
Jolliffe, Lowe v. 253
Jones, Doe d. Bagalley v. 236
Dalton v. 143
Jones v. 76
Goodright d., v. Thrustout 311
Goodtitle d. Jones v. 28, 66
TABLE OF OASES.
Jones d. Griffiths v. Marsh 94, 151
v. Shears 116
v. Lord Say and Sele 60, 61
v. Tatham 230
d. Thomas v. Hengest 284
Thomas d„ v. Thomas 271
v. Thorn 140
Thrustout d., v. Shenton 293
Jordan v. Cleaborne 24, 25
v. Harper 299
Eoe d., v. Ward 74, 105
Jory v. Orchard 269
Jourdan v. "Wilson 55
Juner, Boner v. 166
Jurdan v. Stone 48
Kay, Roe d., v. Soley 320
Keddell, Elden v. 260
Keech d. Warne v. Hall, 29, 43, 77, 265, 337
Keeling, Doe d. Bish v. 139
Keen, Doe d. Barnett v. 69
"Williams d. Johnson v. 228
d. Angel v. Angel 312,313
Byron (Lord) v. Deardon 61,
66, 306, 307
Keigwin v. Keigwin 249
Kemp v. Derrett 103, 104
Doe d. Barrett v. 262
Kendale, Mason d., v. Hodgson 211 (d) 220
Kendrick, Dee d. Bedford v. 107
Kenrick v. Beauclerk (Lord) 61, 63
Kersey, Hindson v. 252 (a)
Kesworth v. Thomas 180
Kightly, Doe d. Bedford (Duke) v. 97
Kildare v. Fisher 22
Kinaston v. Clarke 259
Kineto, Comyn v. 17
King v. Bery' 166
Cottinghamv. 21, 22, 174
Doe d. Powell v. 273
Prosser v. 169
Goodtitle d., v. "Woodward 89 (b)
Rees d. Powell v. 126
Shortv/ 312,315
"Watson v. 243
Kingsdale v. Mann 302, 303
Knebell, Doe d. London Dock Company,
v. 149
Knight v. Syms 24, 25
Knipe v. Palmer 70
Lackland d. Dowling v. Badland 185, 186
Lade v. Holford 29
Lamb v. Archer 215
Doed. Milnes v. 272
Lambley, Doe d. Eyre v. 271
Laming, Doe d. Pitt v. 136, 141
Lammiman, Goodtitle v. Pinsent d. 174
Langdon, Doe d. Langdon v. 313
Langley, Broughton v. 60
Langridge, Richardson v. 75
Lansdowne (Lord), Penphrase v. 250
Laughlen, Herbert v. 18
Law, Bingham d., v. Gregg 320
Doev. 317
Doe d. Chadwick v. 312, 313
Silvester d., v. Wilson 60
v. Wall is 284
Lawder, Doe d. Moore v. 84
Lawrence, Driver d. Osenden v. 41, 216,233
Doe d. Barber v. 149
Lawson, Johnson v. 242
Lea, Doe d. Spicer v. 96 (c) 104, 105, 107
Leak, Roecl, v. Doe 215
Leake, Ford v. 24
Lee v. Libb 248, 249
v. Norris 57
Rigby v. 292
Roe d., v. Ellis 181
v. Rowkeley 292
Leeds (Duke), Pugh v. 178 (a)
Lees, Roe v. 99
Legg d. Scott v. Benion 92, 94
Leighton v. Leighton 309
Lemayne v. Stanley 248
Levi, Doe d Mitchell v. 92
Lewis, Cawdor (Earl) v. 341
Doe d. De Rutzen v. 143, 149
Hitchings v. 129 (c) 130
Earl v. 258
Right d., v. Beard 75, 83
Libb, Lee v. 248, 249
Lightfoot, Doe d. Roylance v. 39, 44
Limbert, Lindsay v. 50
Lindley, Berrey v. 106
Lindsay v. Limbert 50
Lingon, Chamier v. 336
Linsey v. Clerk 290
Lippencott, Doe d. Harwood v. 217
Lister, Garret v. 260
Litherland, Doed. Mee v. 217, 276
Little v. Heaton 119
Littler, Clymer v. 286
Llewelyn V. Williams 178(a)
Lloyd, Doe d. Neville v. 203
v. Peel 340
London (Bishop), Res v. 17
Long, Doe d. Bennett v. 33, 86
Longchamp d. Goodfellow v. Fish 254
Longford v. Eyre 251
Longhurst, Goodwin v. 46, 48
Lonsdale, Doe d. Raper v. 167
Lord, Doe d. Stevens v. 297, 299
Roe d. Thorne v. 240
Loveless v. Ratcliff 303
Roe d. Cash v. 46, 264
Lovelock d. Norris v. Dancaster 216 (5) 217
Lowe, Roe d. Ebral v. 68
v. Jolliffe 253
Lowthal v. Tomkins 51
Lucas, Denn d., v. Fulford 311
Doe d. Buross v. 94
TABLE OP CASES. xli
Lucas v. How 56
Luffe, Rex, v. 242
Luslrington d. Godfrey v. Dose 306
Luxmore, Goodtitle d., v. Saville 145
Luxton, Doe d. Blake v. 28
Maberley, Thompson v. 99
Macliel v. Temple 251
Macdunoch v. Stafford 20, 22
M'Keay, Doe d. Nicholl v. 76
M'Kenire v. Fraser 254
Maddon d. Baker v. "White 87
Maddox, Orrell v. 268
Maisey, Doe d. Robey v. 42 (c) 264
Manifold, Doed. Wright v. 251
Mann, Kingsdale v. 302,303
Winkworth v. 176 (b)
Manning, Parker v. 41, 233
Mantle v. "Wellington 166
Marchetti, Doe d. Palk v. 142
Marsh, Jones d. Griffiths v. 94, 157
Marshal, Pitzgerld v. 23, 25
Martin v. Davis 218
Martyn v. Nichols 24
Mason v. Fox 287
d. Kendall v. Hodgson 211 (cl) 220
Massey v. Rice 25
Masters, Doe d. Harris v. 122,127
Matthews, Fenn d., v. Smart 148
May v. May 241
Maynard, Rawson v. 24
Medlicott v. Brewster 219
Mellish, Baker v. 41, 68, 233
Mence, Brooke d., v. Baldwin 301
Mercer, Tupper d., v. Doe 191
Merrell v. Smith 178, 179 (cl)
Messenger v. Armstrong 112
Metcalf v. Harvey " 342
Methold v. Noright 203
Meux, doe d. Morecraft v. 142
Mew, Doe d. Bassett v. 173
Milburn, Goodtitle d. Baker v. 265
Powell v. 258
Millener v. Robinson 166
Miller, Doe d. Maidon (Mayor) v 169
Rumford v. 180
Scott v. 114, 151
"Warry v. 46
v. Foster 258
Throgmorton d., v. Smith 310
Mills, Doe d. Bullen v. 276
Tennyd., v. Cutts 193
Minshall, Roe d. Crompton v. 116
Minshul, Doe d. Orampton v. 132
Mirehouse, Doe d. Thompson v. 303
Mitchell, Doe d. Pritchett v. 41, 89, 233
Mizem, Doe d. Lord Manvers v. 90, 276
Moggridge v. Davis 341
Molineuxv. Fnlgam 303
v. Molineaux 18
Montifiore. Wheeler v. 43
Moody, Tenny d. Gibbs v.
Moore, Doe d. Durant v.
Evans v.
v. Fursden
v. Goodright
v. Hawkins
Morewood, Outram v.
Morgan, Goodtitle d. Norris v.
v. Stapeley
Morresv. Barry
Morris v. Barry
Morse, Doe d. Tucker v.
Moss v. Gallimore
Goodright d. Stevens v.
Mostyn v. Fabrigas
Murgatroyd, Sykes d., v.
Murless, Doe d. Batten v.
Murrell, Goodtitle d., v. Badtitle
Musgrave, Doe d. Butcher v.
N.
166,
100,
29, 4
60
329
201
288
321
231
236
44
298
287
166
81
2(c)
241
165
85
256
293
267
Nash v. Ooates 64
Nepean v. Doe 29, 34
Doe d. Knight v. 243
Neving, Soulsby v. 115
Newman v. Holdmyfast 17, 289
Shirley v. 104
Newton, Waddy v. 18
Nichols, Martyn v. 24
Nicoll, Came v. 236
Noden, Doe d. Miller v. 82
Noke v. Windham 310
Nokes, Awder v. 56
Norfolk, (Duke,) Goodtitle d., v. Notitle 186
Noright, Goodright d. Russell v. 212
Stephenson v. 128
Methold v. 203
Normon, Gardiner v. 158 (a)
Norris, Lee v. 57
Goodtitle d., v. Morgan 44
Lovelock d., v. Dancaster 216(&). 217
North, Goodtitle v. 334, 340
Notitle, Goodtitle d. Norfolk (Duke) v. 186
Nowell v. Roake 346
0.
Oakapple d. Green v. Copous 271
Oates d. Wigfall v. Brydon 29, 224
Odingsall v. Jackson 25
Ode v. Cook 252 (a)
Old, Doe d. Bristow v. 155
Arlesford, (Inhabitants,) Rex v. 18
Olley, Doe d. Garrod v. 18, 263
Onslow, (Lord) Brewer d., v. Eaton 132 (c)
Orchard, Jorv v. 269
Ormerod, Doe d. Wild v. 247 (5)
Orrell v. Maddox 268
Osborn v. Rider 178 (a)
Otway, Addison v. 160
Ougly, Peate v. 248
xlii TABLE OP CASE£
Outram v. Morewood 236
Owen, Doe d. Evans v. 256
Oxenden, Doe d. Davey v. 34, 268
Driver d., v. Lawrence 41, 216, 233
Page, Symonds v.
Paine, Roe d. Goatley v.
Palmer's Case
Palmer, Doe d. Brierly v.
v. Edwards
Knipe v.
Parke, Doe d. Danson v.
346
141
24
113
135
70
50
Thrustout d., v. Troublesome 315, 317
Parker v. Manning 41, 233
• Doe d., v. Hillyard 331
Eoe d. Beebee v. 245
d. Walker v. Constable 75, 87
White v. 61
Parkin, Aislin v. 171, 336, 343, 344
Parsons, Lord Rancliffe v. 254
Zouehv. 171
Partridge v. Ball 42 (c), 170, 171
Pasquali, Doe d. Williams v. 86
Passer, Dobbs v. 211 (d)
Passinghara, Doe d. Lloyd v. 237, 254
Patterson d. Gradridge v. Eades 160
Pattison, Congleton (Mayor) v. 55
Paul, Doe d. Wheeldonv. 121 (6), (c)
Pawlett, Croft v. 253
Payne's Case, 57
Payne, Doe v. 275
Wood v. 22, 289
Peaceable d. Hornblower v. Read 69
v. Troublesome 186
d. Uncle v. Watson 236
Peacock, Roe d., v. Ruffin 102
Peafer, Aldenburgh v. 110
Pearce, Roe d. Rochester (Dean) v. 270
Pearse, Phillips v. 41, 58, 233
Pearson, Doe d. Gill v. 167
Peate v. Ougly 248
Peck, Doe d. Flower v. 140, 152
Peel, Lloyd v. 340
Pegge, Doe d. Bristow v. 29
Pemble v. Sterne 20, 24
Pembroke, (Lord) Doe d. Johnson v. 242
Pendrell v. Pendrell 242
Penphrase v. Lansdowne (Lord) 250
Pennant's Case 56, 116, 131, 155
Percival, Thrustout d. Dunham v. 311
Perrin, Doe d. Willis v. 98
Perrott, Doe d. Mears v. 94
Peters, Goodright d., v. Vivian 139
Peterson, Barnes v. 21, 22
Petifer, Ward v. 19
Peto v. Checy 160
Pett, Doe d. Blight v. 166
Petty, Eccleston v. 251
Pewtress, Fenn d., v. Granger 234
Peytoe's Case 228 (a)
Phillips v. Bury 228
Phillips, Chaworth v
Doe d. Birch v.
Thorn v.
Wilson v.
57
310
147
41, 58, 233
Right d., v. Smith, 63
Snow d. Crawley v. 257
Pick, Crofts v. 50
Pierce, Davies v. 236
Roe d. Rochester (Dean) v. 91, 170 (/)
Piers, Swadling v. 171
Pierson v. Tavenor 303
Pike v. Badmering 253
Pilkington, Doe d. Hardman v. 179, 180
Pitcher, Rodgers v. 51
Pitt, Reynolds v. 140 (c), 156
Pleasant d. Hayi i v. Benson 92
Plomer v. Hockhead 158
Plowman, Doe d. Blackwell v. 66 (g)
Bradshaw v. 22
Poole, Doe d., v. Ebrington 9
Pope, Goodtitle d. Taysum v. 320
Porch, Doe d. O'Connell V. 181
Porter, Doe d. Shore v. 52, 87, 172
Postlethwaite, Warren v. 249
Potts v. Durant 258
Poultney v. Holmes 135
Povey, Davies d., v. Doe 212, 303
Powell, Doe d. Lloyd v. 139
v. Milburn 258
Rees d., v. King 126
Power, Rowe d. Boyce v. 288
Preston, Jenny d., v. Cutts 207
Prideaux, Doe d. Brune v. 79, 85
Price, Doe d. Price v. 76
Goodtitle d., v. Badtitle 163
Hancock v. 22
Hazlewood d., v. Thatcher 186, 194(a)
Right d. Cator v. Price 248, 251
Pring, Ackland v. 64
Pritchard, Doe d. Griffiths v. 70, 151
Jenkins d. Harris v. 240
Proctor v. Johnson 303 (d
)
Prosser, Doe d. Fisher v. 69
Pugh v. Leeds (Duke) 178 (a)
Puisent, Goodtitle v., d. Lammiman 174
Pullen, Doe d. Rogers v. 76
Puller, Hutchinson v. 24
Pulteney v. Warren 336
Purdy, Davis v. 177
Pure d. Withers v. Sturdy 128
Purvis, Denn d. Purvis v. 176
Quigley, Doe d. Knight v.
Raby, Doe d. Greaves v.
Radcliff v. Chaplin
Ran'an, Doe d. Peacock v.
75, 84
225, 235
245
105
TABLE OF CASES. xliii
Ramsbottom, Doe d. Jackson v. 41, 233, 256
Rancliff (Lord) v. Parsons 254
Rand, Guy v. 176
Randal], Doe d. Futter v. 241
Ranger, Goodtitle d., v. Roe 163
Ratcliff's Case 49
Ratcliff, Loveless v. 303
v. Tate 303
Rawlings, Roe d. Brune v. 258
Rawlins, Denn d. Brune v. 76
Rawlinson, Timmins v. 75
Rawson v. Maynard 24
Read, Doe d. Reade v.
Marsack v. 91, 167, 234
Good title d., v. Badtitle 196
Peaceable d. Hornblower v. 69
Rede v. Farr 155
Redfern, Doe d. Hayne v. 58
Rees, Doed. Gatehouse v. 151, 152
d. Powell v. King 126
Reid, Doe d. Spencer v. 226
Rennet, Rex v. 46
Rennie v. Robinson 232
Revett, Goodtitle d., v. Braham 238
Rex v. Bryant 297
Caermarthen (Burgesses) 284
Eriswell (Inhabitants) 242, 257
Erith (Inhabitants) 242
Harris, 303
London (Bishop) 17
Luffe, 242
Old Ariesford (Inhabitants) 18
Rennett 46
Shelley 253
Stoke (Inhabitants) ] 9
Thruscross (Inhabitants) 262
Unitt 162
Reynolds v. Pitt 140 (c) 156
Doe v. 307
Rhodes, Scrape, v. 180
Rice, Massey v. 25
Rich, Goodright d. Balsh v. 235
v. Johnson 263
Ryalv. 115
Wilson v. 158
Richards v. Richards 240
Richardson, Burne v. 337 (a)
v. Lengridge 75
Richmond (Mayor of), Barwick d., v.
Thompson 232
Rickarby, Doe d. Hindley v. 274
Rickhouse, Rochester v. 22, 23
Rider, Osborn v. 178 (a)
Ridgeway, Doed. Sutton v. 316
Higham v. 241
Right d. Bomsall v. "Wrong 196
Cator v. Price 248, 251
v. Darby 100 (&) 101
d. Jeffrey v. "Wrong 209
Jeffreys v. Bucknell 266
d. Fisher v. Cuthell 88
Flower v. Darby 105
Fowler v. Darby 85
Freeman v. Roe 197
Right d. Lewis v. Beard 75, 83
Phillips v. Smith 63
Wells (Dean of) v. Bawden 85
v. "Wrong 190
Rigley v. Lee 292
Rising, Doe d. Hughes v. 77
Roake, Nowell v. 346
Roberts v. Cook 313
Doe d. Roberts v. 310
Fagg v. 283 (d)
Goodtitle d., v. Badtitle 193
v. Hayward 95
Robinson, Doe d. Rhodes v. 88
Millener v. 166
Rennie v. 232
Robson, Doe d. Chandless v. 126
Rochester v. Rickhouse 22, 23
(Dean) Roe d., v. Pierce 91,
95, 170(0) 270
Rock Doe d. Stanway v. 37
Roe, Baker v. 17
Barrow v. 194
d. Beebee v. Parker 245
d. Bamford v. Hayley 91
d. Blair v. Street 76, 93, 301
Brown v. Wilkinson 103
Brune v. Prideaux 85
Rawlings 258
Cash v. Loveless 46, 264
Cholmondeley v. Doe 285
Cook v. Doe 221
Crompton v. Minshall 116
Davis d. Povey v. 212
Dingley v. Sales 136
Doe v. 163, 183, 191, 193, 194, 196,
197, 199, 201, 205, 207, 208,
326, 330
Doe d. Agar v. 197
Anglesey v. 328
Ashman v. 163
Averv v. 327
Aylesbury (Lord) v. 193
Bailey v. 190
Baring v. 192
Barles v. 203
Barth v. 208
Bassv. 1S7
Bath (Marquis) v. 196
Batson v. 195
Beyer v. 304
Boulton v. 183, 206, 220
Boulcott v. 196
Beard v. 326, 327
Bloxam v. 165
Bracebridge v. 195
Bradford (Earl) v. 326
Brenner v. 196
Brickfield v. 198
Briggs v. 196
Bromley v. 190, 191
Brook v. I 63
Brown v. 192
Buckle v. 194
Burrows v. 201
xliv TABLE OF CASES.
Eos, Doe d. Cardigan (Lord) v.
Caulfield v.
Chad wick v.
Chaffey v.
Channell v.
Clarke v.
Clothier v.
Cobbey v.
Cockburn v.
Collins v.
Coopers' Company v.
Courthorpe v.
Cousins v.
Croley v.
Crooks v.
Croome v.
Darwent v.
Davies v.
Davis v.
Diamond v.
Dickens v.
Dickenson v.
Downes v.
Durant v.
d. Ebrall v. Lowe
Doe d. Edwards v.
Elderton v.
Elwood v.
Emsley v.
325
327
192
198
164
185
190
119
197
193
191
200
203
201
163
209
187
283
193, 283
185
192
164, 179
204
197
68
204
199
190
199
Evans v. 130, 162,163, 186, 19S
Faithful v. 227, 305
Feldon v.
Fell v.
Fenwick v.
Field v.
Figgins v.
Finch v.
Fisher v.
Folkes v.
Foster v.
Fraser v.
Frodsham v.
Frost v.
George v.
Gibbard v.
Gildart v.
Giles v.
Gillett v.
Ginger v.
Goodwin v.
Gowland v.
Graff v.
Grange v.
Gray v.
Green v.
Grimes v.
Grocers' Company v.
Hall v.
Halsey v.
Hambrook v.
Handle v.
Heblethwaite v.
Hele v.
Hill v.
. Hutchinson v. 190
Isherwood v. 185
Jackson v. 205
Jenks v. 203
Johnson v. 192
31
208
195
183, 190
199
199
191
183
208
205
187
183, 198
204, 205
192, 199
326 (d)
164
162
224
165
164, 327
196
196
192
164
190
211
190
197
197, 199
201
217
195
194
Jones v. 195, 199, 204, 205
Kerr v. 226
Knight v. 153
Kushner v. 192
Law v. 201
Ledger v. 211
Levi v. 206
Lewis v. 186
Llandesilio v. 170
Lloyd v. 303
Lowe v. 195
Lowndes v. 200
Ludford v. 206
Luffv. 198
Macdougallv. 197, 199
Marshall v. 1 99
Martin v. 199
Martyns v. 191
Mather v. 195
Messer v. 183
Messier v. 198
Mingay v. 196
Moody v. 198
Morgan v. 198, 210, 307
Morpeth v. 193
Mortlake v. 200
Morton v. 230
Mudd v. 313, 316
Mullarkeyv. 211
Nash v. 196
Newman v. 164
Norman v. 201
Norris v. 330
Norton v. 228
Notting v. 199
Osbaldiston v. 201
Overton v. 190
Pamphilon v. 194
Parr v. 211, 223
Pate v. 303
Peach v. 183
Pearson v. 164, 184, 217
Pemberton v. 326
Phillips v. 326
Pinckard v. 316
Portland (Duke) v. 203
Potter v. 198
Powell v. 126
Protheroe v. 199
Quintin v. 204
Roberts v. 186
Robinson v. 193, 205
Rochester (Dean) v. Pierce
91, 95, 170, (/) 270
Rogers v. 164
Ross v. 191
Rust v. 229
St. Margaret, "Westminster 194
St. Margaret's Hospital (Gov-
TABLE OF CASES. xly
ernors of) v.
Roe, Doe d. Sampson v.
Sanders v.
Seott v.
Scrivon v.
Seabrook v.
Selgood v.
" Shaw v.
Shepherd v.
Sheppard v.
Showell v.
183 ' Roe Goodtitle d. Ranger
326, 328 Roe d. Gregson v. Harrison
325
183.
Simmons v.
Smart v.
Smith v.
Smithers v.
Smythe v.
Somers (Earl) v.
Somerville v.
Stainton v.
Standish v.
Stone v.
Street v.
Summers (Lord) y.
Sykes v.
Symes v.
Tarpley v.
Tattersall v.
Thomas v.
Thomson v.
Threader v.
Timmins v.
Timothy v.
Tindal v.
Tindale v.
Tindall v.
Tomkins v.
Tonsley v.
Treat v.
Troughton v.
Tubb v.
Tucker v.
Turncroft v.
Vernon v.
Vincent v.
192, 194
204
130, 201
328
211
168,
190
201
196
183
190, 199, 201
163 I
192
192
330
183
313
204
179
200
198
185
195
164
185
211
200
198
201
163
135, 148, 154
Haldane v. Harvey 28
Hambrook v. Roe
Hardman v. Pilkington
v. Hasland
d. Henderson v. Charnock
Humphreys v. Doe
Hunter v. Galliers
197, 199
180
243
103
305
120, 137
Jeffereys v. Hicks 47, 253, 262
Johnson v. Ireland
Jordan v. Ward
Kay v. Soley
Leak v. Doe
Lee v. Ellis
v. Lees
d. Peacock v. Ruffin
Raper v. Lonsdale
Right d. Freeman v.
Rochester (Dean) v. Pierce
91, 95, 270
Stephenson v. Doe 179
Thorne v. Lord 240
"West v. Davis 121, 122,
124, 125, 127, 268, 273
74, 79, 105
320
215
181
99
102
167
197
Vorley v.
Wade v.
Walker v.
Warne v.
Warren v.
Warwick (Earl) v,
Watson v.
Welchon v.
Weeks v.
Wetherell v.
White v.
Whitfield v.
Wiggs v.
Witles v.
Williams v.
Wills v.
Wilson v.
Wingfield v.
d. Goatley v. Paine
v. Wiggs
v. Williamson
d. Wrangham v. Hersey
Rogers v. Humphrey
Pitcher
Rolfe v. Harris
Doe d. Hinton v.
325
|
Rolle, Gree v.
199; Ross, Doe d. Gore v.
197
j
Rosser, Doe d Morris v.
Rotberham, Doe d. Morgan v.
Rowe d. Boyce v. Power
Bowell, Clarke v.
Goodright d., v. Vice
Rowkeley, Lee v.
Rowlinson, Timmins v.
Rowlinson, Timmins v.
211, 293 Rovston v. Eccleston
163 ! Ruffin, Roe d. Peacock v.
200
j
Rummey v. Eves
227 ' Rushworth, Doe d. Holder v.
190, 1
202
193
211(d)
319
196
200
211
204. 205
196, 208
183
197
209
327
Russell, Webb v.
Goodright d..
Ryal v. Rich
Rys, Doe d. Horton
Noright
92, 190
173
172
43
51
140, (c)
46
291
163
72
327
288
173
294
292
75, 115, 334
94
21, 24, 25
102
244
326
57, 147
212
115
217
202
j g
191
201 St. John v. Comyn 21, 22
191 St. Leger v. Adams 247
125,(a) 204 ! Sales, Doe d. Dingley v. 136
209 Salisbury's Case 261
163
J
Salter, Doe d. Prior v. 297
190,196 Tollettv. 175
224|Saltonstall, Capelv. 183
208, 209 Samuel, Doe d. Castleton v. 105, 271
196 Sandwich's Case 284
141 j Sandy's, Goodright d., v. Badtitle 207
xlvi TABLE OF CASES.
Savage v. Dent 157, 189
Savel's Case 24, 25
Savel, Hammond v. 24
Saville, G-oodtitle d. Luxmore v. 145
Say and Sele (Lord), Jones v. 60, 61
Sayer, Doe d. Leeson v. 75, 84
Seagrave, Sullivan v. 24
Seaton, Doe d. Strode v. 238, 292
Semayne's Case 301
Scott, Doe d. Campbell v. 102
Graham v. 66
Stevens v. 61
Legg, d., v. Beuion 92, 94
Scrape v. Rhodes ISO
Scratton v. Driver 180
Searle, Claxmore v. 283
Seawell, Bond v. 250
Seed, Tyley v. 103
Seers v. Hind 148
Selwyn, Doe d. Wadmore v. 107
Shackleton, Fairelaim d. Fowler v. 69
Shadvvell, Doe d. Thomas v. 313
Shamtitle, Fairelaim d. Fowler v.
12, 215 216, 218
Shank, Douglass v. 176(c)
Shapland v. Smith 60
Sharpe, Chapman v. 48
Hodson v. 41, 233
Shawcross, Doe d. Lawrence v. 171, 172
Shears, Jones v. 116
Shelly, Rex v. 253
Shenton, Thrustout d. Jones v. 293
Sherwin, Bath (Earl) v. 309
Doe d. Pitt v. 140
Shipley, Doe d. Stanfield v. 159 (g)
Shires v. Glasscock 250
Shirley v. Newman 104
Short v. Heath 346
v. King 312, 315
Silley, Collins v. 56
Silvester d. Law v. Wilson 60
Sinclair, Doe d. Daffey v. 296
Sindercome, Bindover v. 21, 24
Skinner, Ablett v. 176
V. Stacey 320
Skirrow, Doe d. Leeming v. 277
Slade's Case 52
Slade, Doe d. Syburn v. 66
England d. Syburn v. 41, 233
Sleabourne v. Bengo 288
Smales v. Day 69
Small d. Baker v. Cole 284, 289
Smallwood, Goodright d, v.Strother 26, 174
Smart, Doe d. Smith v. 239
Fenn d. Matthews v 148
Wharod v. 307
Smartle v. Williams 44
Smartley v. Heuden 159
Smith v. Barrett 17
v. Clarke 94
v. Crabb 219
Davy v. 250
Doe d. Bland v. 256
Bromfield v. 87
Chere v. 149
Hanson v. 253
Jersey (Lord) v. 122 (b)
Williams v. 222, 230, 293
Wilson v. 196
Wright v. 293
Ellis v. 248
v. Evans 248
d. Ginger v. Barnardiston 293,
294, 314
Merrellv. 178, 179(d)
Right d. Phillips v. 63
Shapland v. 60
v. Spooner 126(a)
Throgmorton d. Miller v. 310
Vernon v. 54, 55
Smythe (Lady), Doe d. Knight v. 217, 276
Snapp, Archer d. Hankey v. 320
Snee, Doe d. Teverell v. 199
Bird v. 161
Snow d. Crawley v. Phillips 257
Snowdon, Doe d. Doggett v. 109
Soley, Roe d. Kay v. 320
Somerset, Doe d. Aislin v. 89
Somerville, Doe d. Cates v. 82
Soulsby v. Neving 115
Sparke, Weeks v. 242
Sparks's Case 46
Sparrow, Wykes v. 25
Spence, Doe d. Strickland v. 108, 109
Spencer's Case 54
Spencer, Doe d. Clarke v. 50
Spiller, Doe v. 95
Spooner, Smith v. 126 (a)
Spray, Doe d. Goodwin v. 245
Sprightley d. Collins v. Durch 194
Spry, Doe d. Gaskell v. 139
Spurrier, Denn v. 99
Stacey, Skinner v. 320
Stafford, Macdunoch v. 20, 22
Standish, Doe d. Blackburn v. 314
Stanley, Ashworth v. 22
Lemayne v. 248
Stanton, Doe d. James v. 235
Stapeley, Morgan v. 298
Staple, Doe d. Hodson v. 28, 29, 66
Steel, Doed. Digby v. 113, 255
Stennett, Doed. Hollingsworth v. 75, 83
Stephens, Copeland v. 50
v. Croker 178 (a)
v. Eliot 46
Doe d., v. Lord 299
Doe d. Walker v. 253, 312
Stephenson, Goodright d., v. Noright 128
Roed., v. Doe 179
Sterne, Pemble v. 20, 24
Stevens, Doe d. Abdy v. 142
Goodright d., v. Moss 241
Stoke (Inhabitants), Rex v. 19
Stone, Jurdan v. 48
Stonehouse v. Evelyn 248
Story v. Windsor 69
Stradling, Doe v. 235
Sullivan v. 41, 233
TABLE OF CASES. xlvii
Stratton, Doe d. Tilt v. 81
Street, Roe d. Blair v. 16, 93, 301
Strode v. Seaton 173
Strother, Goodright d. Smallwood v. 26, 174
Stroud, Hems v. 26, 258
Sturdy, Pure d. Withers v. 1 28
Suffield, Doe d. Westminster (Marquis)
v. 128
Sulley y. Doe d. Taylerson 70
Sullivan v. Seagrave 24
v. Stradling 41, 233
Sutton, Doe d. Pitman v. 142
Swadling v. Piers 171
Swan, Fox v. 134, 151
Syburn, England d.,v. Slade 41, 233
Sykesd. Murgatroyd v. 85
Symonds v. Page 346
Whiteacre d. Boult v. 114
Syms, Dumpor v. 148
Knight v. 24, 25
Tate, Ratcliff v. 303
Tatham, Jones v. 230
Wright v. Doe d. 252, 292 (b)
Tavernor, Pierson v. 303
Taylerson, Doe d., Sulley v. 70
Taylor d. Atkins v. Horde 286, 299
v. Cole 51
v. Jefts 189
v. Wilbore 290
Taysum, G-oodtitle d., v. Pope 320
Temple, Machel v. 251
Tenny d. Gibbs v. Moody 60
Mills v. Cutts 193
Terry Doe d. Higgs v. 59, 79
Thatcher, Hazlewood d. Price v. 186, 194 (a)
Thomas, Challenor v. 19
v. Chamberlayne 76
Doe d. Courtall v. 68
Reesv. 313, 316
Fenn d., v. Griffith 268
v. Goodtitle 307
Jones d., v. Hengest 284
d. Jones v. Thomas 271
Kesworth v. 180
Thompson, Barwick d. Richmond (Mayor
of) v. 232
Doe d. Thompson v. 37
v. Maberley 99
Thomson, Doe d. Burgess v. 76, 262
Thorn, Doe d. Emmett v. 256 (g)
Thorn by d. Hamilton v. Fleetwood 298
Thorne, Jones v. 140
Roe d., v. Lord 240
Thorp v. Fry 344 (e)
Thorpe, Hatfield v. 251
Thredway v. Harbert 312
Threr v. Barton 57, 147
Throgmorton d. Fairfax v. Bentley 283
Miller v. Smith 310
Trustout v. Bedwell 280, 296
d. Dunham v. Percival 311
Thrustout, Goodright d. Jones v. 311
Goodright d. Waddington v. 196
v. Gray 180
Hyde d. Culliford v. 210
d. Jones v. Shenton 293
Parke v. Troublesome 315, 317
Turner v. Grey 208, 311
Williams v. Holdfast 312,313
Wilson v. Foot 294
Thunder d. Weaver v. Belcher 42, 76,
77, 78, 84, 265
Thurcross (Inhabitants), Rex v. 262
Thyn v. Thyn 16
Timmins v. Rawlinson 75, 115, 234
v. Rowlinson 94
Tindal, Doe d. Hogg v. 169, 281
Todd v. Winchelsea (Earl), 250, 251
Tombs, Goodtitle v. 336, 345
Tomkins, Lowthal v. 51
Toulson, Wheeler v. 19, 20
Townsend v. Ives 252 (a)
Trappaud, Doe d. Clark v. 265
Tredder v. Davis 185
Treport's Case 166
Troublesome, Peaceable v. 186
Thrustout d. Parke v. 315, 317
Trussell, Doe d. Lippingwell v. 298
Trymer v. Jackson 248
Tubley, Duckworth d., v. Tunstall 129
Tuckett, Doe d. Reynell v. 182
Tunstall v. Brend 165
Duckworth d. Tubley v. 129
Tupper d. Mercer v. Doe 191
Turford, Doe d. Patteshall v. 270
Turner v. Barnaby 283, 294
Doe d. Bennett v. 37, 76
Thrustout d., v. Grey 280, 311
Tyleyv. Seed 103
Tyrrell, Fenn d., v. Denn 193
IT.
Uncle, Peaceable d., v. Watson 236
Underbill, Devereux v. 303
Unitt, Rex v. 162
Upton v. Wells 302
Utterson v. Vernon 338 (b)
V.
Vaughan, ex parte 156
Vernon v. Smith 54, 55
Utterson v. 338 (6)
Vicars v. Heydon 182
Vice, Goodright d. Rowell v. 294
Vickers, Doe d. Ogle v. « 267
Vickerv. Alford v. 89, 94
Vince, Doe d. Hinde v. 98, 108
Vivian, Goodright d. Peters v. 139
. Vivyan v. Arthur 56
Vooght v. Winch 343
Vowels v. Young 241, 242, 244
xlviii TABLE OP CASES.
W.
"Waddington, Goodright d., v. Thrustout 196
Waddy v. Newton 18
Wade v. Cole 48
Wadman v. Caleraft 128
Wagstaff, Gulliver v. 203
Waiuright, Doe d. Rowlandson v. 169
Wakefield, Goodgain v. 178 (a)
Wakely, Warren v. 22, 25, 176
Walbrook, Doe d. Keen v. 64
Walker, Parker d., v. Constable 75, 87
Wallis, Law v. 284
Walter, Goodright d., v. Davids 151
Goodtitle d. Brembridge v. 175
Walters, Doe d. Mann v. 89
Walton, Goodtitle v. 22
Wandlass, Doe d. Porster v. 126, 301
Wanklen, Goodtitle d., v. Badtitle 203
Ward, Doe d. Jordon v. 79
Goodright d., v. Badtitle, 230, 293
v. Petifer 19
Roe d. Jordan v. 74, 79, 105
Zouch d., v. Willingale 116
Warden's Case 26
Warne, Keech d., v. JJall 29, 43, 77, 337
Warueford v. Warneford 248
Warren, Pulteney v. 336
v. Postlethwaite 249
v. Wakeley 22, 25, 176
Warwick, Doe d. Giles v. 235
Watkins, Doe d. Lord Bradford v. 93, 94, 110
Watson, Doe d. Lowdon, v. 41, 333
v. King 243
Peaceable d. Uncle v. 236
Watt, Doe d. Henniker v. 146
Watts, Doe d. Martin v. 79
Way, Goodtitle d. Estwick v. SO (b)
Weakley d. Yea v. Bucknell 29, 80 (b)
Weaver, Thunder d., v. Belcher 42, 76, 77,
78, 84, 265
Webb v. Russell 57, 147
Webber, Doe d. North v. 45
Smith v. 292, 295
Webster, Doe d. Norton v. 59
Weeks, Eastcourt v. 46
v. Sparke 242
Welch, Goodright d., v. Flood 22 (h)
Weller, Doe d. Collins v. 105
Wellington, Danvers v. 23
Wells, Bally v. 54
Wells, Doe d. Graves v. 86
Right d., v. Bawden 85
Upton v. 302
Welsh, Doe d. Gunson v. 234 (e)
West, Connor V. 21, 25
Roe d., v. Davis 121, 122, 124, 125,
127, 268, 273
Weston, Heatherly d. Worthington v. 166
Wharod v. Smart 307
Wharton, Doe d. Da Costa v. 28, 42, 47 (&),
51, 78, 256
Wheatley, Comyn v. 17 I
Wheatley, Wright v.
Wheeler, Doe d. Bedford v.
v. Montiriore
v. Toulson
Whitcomb, Doe v.
21
150
43
19, 20
343
White v. British Museum (Trustees) 248, 249
Denn v. 343
Madden d. Baker v. 87
v. Parker 61
Whiteacre d. Boult v. Symonda 114
Whitehead, Doe d. Bridger v. 275
Whitley, Johns v. 156
Whitlocke v. Baker 243
Whittingham v. Andrews 27
Wigfall, Oates d., v. Brydon 29, 224
Wiggs, Roe v. 92, 190
Wilbore, Taylor v. 290
Wilkinson v. Colley 91
Doe d. Armstrong v. 98
Doe d. Brown v. 101, 103
Willan, Doe d. Tomkyns v. 64
Williams, Doe d. David v. 87, 117
Doe d. Morse v. 292
Rees v. 64, 66
d. Johnson v. Keen 228
Llewelyn v. 178 (a)
Roe v. 173
Smartle v. 44
Thrustout d., v. Holdfast 312, 313
Willingale, Zouch d. Ward v. 116
Wilson v. Abbott 102
Doe d. Drapers' Company v. 235, 290,
300
Foley v. 45, 76, 262
Pill 238
v. Hodges 241
Jourdan v. 55
v. Rich 15 S
Silvester d. Law v. 60
Thrustout d., v. Foot 294
Winch, Doe d. Williams v. 316
Vooght v. 343
Winchelsea, (Earl) Todd v. 250
Windham, Noke v.' 310
Windsor, Story v. 69
Wine, Baldwin v. 26 (6)
Winkworth v. Mann 176 (b)
Wippel, Doe d. Bryant v. 167
Wisdom, George d. Bradley v. 305
Wither v. Gibson 119
Withers v. Harris 303, 308
Pure d., v. Sturdy 128
Witherwick, Doe d. Upton v. 304
Wolley, Doe d. Oldham v. 242, 254
Wollington, Mantle v. 166
Wombwell, Doe d. Baker v. 272
Wood, Fenn d. Blanshard v. 235
Furley d. Canterbury (Mayor) v. 9S,
107
Goodright v. 284, 285
Hammond v. 51, 256
Doe d. Hanley v.
v. Payne
Woodcock v. Gibson
IS
22, 289
58
TABLE OF CASES. xlis
Woodhouse, Gravenor v. 41, 233
"Woodman, Doe d. Lord Carlisle v. 93
Woodroffe, Doe d. Daniel v, 189
"Woodward, Arnsby v. 155
G-oodtitle d. Kin? v. 89 (5)
"Woollams, Holdfast d., v. Clapham 47, 244
Worrall v. Bent 288
v. Harper 26, 178
"Worsely, Doe d. Holland v. 136
"Worthington, Heatherley d., v. "Weston 166
Wrangliam, Roe d., v. Hersey IT
2
"Wright, Birch v. 77, 99, 116, 265, 334
Buck v. 42 (c)
Doe v. 341
Doe d. Burdett v. 66
v. Doe d. Tatham 252, 292 (6)
Fenn d., v. Johnston 238
G-oodtitle d., v. Otway 23 (h)
"Wright v. Wheatley 21
v. Wright 248, 249
"Wrightman Doe d. Matthewaon v. 95, 96
Wrong, Right v.
Right d. Bomsall v.
Right d. Jeffery v.
Wroot, Denn d., v. Fenn
Wykesv. Sparrow
Wylde, Doe d. Cotterell v.
190
196
209
229
25
230
Tea, "Weakley d., v. Bucknell 29, 80(&)
Yeomans, Burbury v. 23
Young v. Holmes 52
Vowels v. 241, 242, 244
Zouch d. Forse v. Forse
v. Parsons
d. Ward v. Willingale
52
171
116
TABLE
CASES CITED IN THE NOTES.
Baker v Chase 114
A. v. Dobyns et al. 336
v. Evans 39
Abbott v. Pratt 119 v. Seekright Lessee, &c. 250
Abney et al. v. Barnet 300 Banks, Admr., v. Marksbury 61
Adam Moore v. Lessee of Burnet 127 Barber r. Harris 377
Adams v. Burford 140 Barclay v. Howell 241
Adams v. Rockwell t, 35 Barnitz Lessee v. Casay 88, 135
v. Turner 229 Baron v. Abeel 225, 258, 448, 455
Adamson, Adm'r., &c. v. Smith 99 Barr v. Gratz's Heirs 41, 55, 60
Ainslie v. Mayor, &c, of New Tork 458 Barrett et ux. v. French 87
Alberton v. Heirs of Redding 295 Barstow v. Adams 115
Alden v, Murdock 24 Bates v. Austin 141, 156
Alexander v. Kerr 460 Bates v. Holman, Exr. 351
Allard et al. v. Lobon 79 ex dem. Shattuck v. Tucker 229
Allen v. Jaquish 141 Battin v. Bigslow 443
Allen v. Tremble 230 Baylor v. Neff 43
ex dem. Harrison v. Rivington 311 Beach v. Beach 46, 127
Anderson ads. Darboy 55 105 Beach V. Catlin 60
Anglesey v. Roe 184 et al, v. Walker 354
Ansley v. Nolan 120 Beall v. Harwood 106
Armstrong v. Jackson 230 Beal v. Siverts 254
v. Timman 295 Bear V. Snyder 229, 388
Arnold et al., v. Gorr, et al. 347, 353 354 Beardsley v. Forrey 285
Astorv. Miller 121 Beauchamp, Admr., v. Mudd 100
Atherton v. Johnson 92 Bedford v. M'Elberron 140, 149
Atkenson v. Rittenhouse 334 Bellas v, Hontz 228
Atkyns v. Horde 391 Benjamin v. Armstrong 417
Austin ads. Jackson ex dem. Kimber el Benson et al., v. Matsdorf- 443, 455
al. 381 382 Benson's Lessee v. Musseter 231, 330
Aveut v. Read 42 Betts, &c, v. Shield's Heirs 92, 391
Bevans v. Taylor et al. Lessee 232
Binney v. Chapman 105
B. Birch v. Alexander 323
Birney v. Birney 136
Bailey v. Carleton 51 Black v. Hepburne 20, 23
Bailey et al , v. Fairplay Lessee, &c 37 Blackwell v. Patton & Erwin's Lessee 249
Babcock v. Lamb et al. 23 Bledden v. Baugh 4D
lii TABLE OP OASES CITED IN THE NOTES
Blight v. Atwell 376
Blythe v. M'Clintic 362
et al. v. Richards 363
Boardman v. Bartlett 309
Boiling v. The Mayor, &c, of Peters-burgh
24
Boner v. Smith 305
Bonta, &c, v. Clay 289, 303, 408
Boreing v. Singery 310
Boston Mill Corporation v. Bullfinch 50
Boston Bauk v. Read 445
Boteler v. Allington 84
Botts et al., v. Heild's Heirs 40, 92, 314
Bowdoin Decker v. M'Caskey et al. 149
Bowie v. O'Neil et al. Lessee 58
Bowne v. Potter 113
Bowker v. "Walker 40
Boyd v. Cowan 443
Brackett v. Norcross 88
Bradford v. Bradford 303, 415, 420
Bradish v. Schenck 204
Bradley v. Covel 145, 366
Bradney et al., v. Haselden ex dem.
Harper et al. 249
Bradstreet v. Pratt 34
v. Huntingdon 49, 90
Brandon ads. Grimke 55
Brandt ex dem. Cuyler et al., v. Liver-more
379, 313
Brandt v. Ogden 59
Brandter ex dem. Pitch v. Marshall 90
Bratton v. Mitchell 25, 386
Braxdale v. Hand 89
Breeding v. Taylor 225. 260, 281
Brent v. Dole 332
Lessee v. Trasher 96
Brewster v. Buckholts 445
Brimmer v. Proprietors of Long Wharf 54
Brlnckerhooff v. Remsen 339
Brooks v. Tyler 25
Brothers v. Hurdle 444
Broughton v. Wellington 460
Broussard v. Duhamel 58, 87
Brown v. Demont 400, 405, 408
v. Dysinger et al. 313, 324
v. King 51
v. Lutterloh 230, 245
v. Mace 14, 107, 120
v. Porter 51
v. Syracuse & UticaR. R. Co. 124, 225
Bryan v. Atwater 87, 88
Bryant v. Allen et al. 55
Buckley v. Cunningham 393
Buford v. Gaines 286, 288
Bull's Lessee v. Sheredine 425
Bullock v. Wilson 445
Bum pass v. Webb 445
Bunce et al. v. Wolcott 103
Buntin v. Doe 136
Burke v. Lessee of Young 352
Burns v. Swift et al. 57
Burton v. Austin 443, 445, 447
Burwell et al. v. Corbyn et al. 332, 336
Butler v. Phelps 60
Butts v. Blunt et al. 309
Buxton v. Carter 43
Byrum v. Carter
C.
Camden et al. v. Haskill
56
261 394
Camp v. Camp 41, 105, 316
Camp v. Homesley 449
Campbell et al. Admr's, &c. v. Grantz's
Lessee 251
Campbell v. Galbreath 45
v. Harper 261
Canal Co. v. Rail Road Co. 32
Canoy v. Troutman 127
Carmolt v. Piatt 23
Carothers et al. v. The Lessee of Dun-ning
et al. 5 3, 88
Carpenter v. Thayer 135
Carpenter v. Weeks 113, 114
Carroll et al. Lessee v. Norwooc 's Heirs,
230 393
v. Norwood 299 386
Carson Lessee v. Buodinot 45
Carter v. Branch 303
Carter's Lessee v. Parrott 292 380
Carter y. Washington et al. 313, 404
Catlin v. Washburn 106 141
Catteries v. Cowper 311
Chaffee and Chapman v. Baptist Miss.
Convention 338, 340
Chalker v. Chalker 219
Chamberlain v. Crawford 241
Chambers v. Pureys 24
v. Pleak 90
v. Handley's Heirs 230 231
Chapman v. Armistead 390
Chatfield ex ux. v. Sonters 426
Cheney v. Ringgold et al. 56
Cherraud v. Cunningham 136
Chiles v. Cowley 136
v. Calk 55,7! 303
v. Bridges' Heirs 92, 93, 316
Chilton v. Niblete 141
Cholmondeley v. Clinton et al. 84
City of Cincinnati v. White 47
Clapp v. Paine 141
Clark v. Belmear 42, 353, 354
v. Clark 27
v. Diggs 43
v. Vaughan 88, 136
Clay v. Ransome 14
v. White et al. 14, 392
Cleaveland v. Demming 42
Cluggage et al. v. Duncan's Lessee 352, 323
Cocke's Lessee v. Dotson 56
Codman et al. v. Winslow 55, 56, 57
Coffin v. Lunt 145
Cort v. Weils 308
Coleman v. Maberley 310
v. Parish 443
Collins v. Conty 176
v. Torrey 39
Colston v. M'Kay 38, 43
TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES. liii
Commonwealth v. M'Gowan 55
v. Peters 24
v. Dudley 55, 56, 57
Conner v. Bradley et al. 197
Constantine v. Van Winkle 135
Coock v. Gerry 45
S
Cook v. Nicholas 444
Coolbaugh et al. v. Pierce 388
Cooley v. Penfield 319
Coon v. Rickett 198
Cooper's Lessee v. G-albraith 353
Cooper v. Smith 23, 105
Cooper and Wife v. Whitney 113
Corother's et al. v. Lessee of Dunning et al. 87
Cortelyou v. Van Brundt 23
Coster et al. v. Murray 59
Cotterell v. Dutton 99
Courtney v. Shropshire 230, 231, 234
Covert et al. v. Irwin et al. 354
Cox v. Cromwell 312
Coxe v. Jorrier 229, 237
Cox v. Lacey 245, 246, 394
Craddock's Lessee v. Stalcup 99
Craig v. Clarke 253
v. Taylor 136
Crandale v. Gallup 303
Craven v. Blakney 25
Cravins v. Armour 225, 259
Crittenden v. Crittenden 114
Croft v. Pawlet 349
Crocker v. Fathergill 284
Crockett v. Lashbrook 287
Cropper v. Carlton et ux. 393
Crozier v. Gano et ux. 99
Crunkleton v. Evert 127
Culler et al. v. Motzer 88
Cummings v. Wyman 88
v. M'Gehee 443, 445
Currier v. Earl 156
Cushman v. Blanchard et al. 58
Cuyler et al. v. Bradt 88, 89
D.
Dan et al. v. Brown et al. 342, 344, 350, 351
Daniel v. Ellis et al. 55, 59
Dames v. Welsh 397
Davidson's Lessee v. Beatty 55, 57
Davis et ux. v. Martin 49, 50
Lessee v. Whitesides 231, 295
Dawson v. M'Gill 444
Day v. Alvenson 308, 310, 311
v. Perkins 363
Deakins v. Hollis 336
Dean v. Cornell 331
Dearborn v. Dearborn 363
Deems v. Garrier 388
Delancey v. Ganun 178
Demarest ux. v. Wynkoop et al. 101
Den v. Adams 140
v. Applegate 281
v. Ayres 332
v. Blair 143
v. Chubb 443
Den v. Craig 20
v. Drake 141
v. Evans 230
v. Fen 259, 265, 2S5, 288
v. Fen & Alexander 101
v. Green 287
v. Banning 258, 288
v. Marshall 143
v. Moore 378
v. M'Shane 144
v. M'Shaw 226, 229
v. Shape 287
v. Snowhill 226, 286
v. Stephens 57
v. Stocton 363
v. Taylor 249
v. Vanness 230, 364
v. Webster 42, 45
v. Westbrook 258
v. Winans 258
v. Woodson 241
Den ex dem. Aertun v. Fen 264, 273, 281
Bray et al. v. Fen 302
Burhans v. Vanness 38, 231
Clark v. Lane 48
Cleaveland v. Grime 245
Cunningham v. Michael 388
Denny v. Smith 245
Hoover v. Franklin 249
Johnson v. Morris 14
Lorillard v. Van Houton 124
Midford et ux. v. Harrison 59
Osborne v. Woodson 28
Park v. Cochrane et al. 94
Pierce et al. v. House 99
Smith v. Fen et al. 106
Trustees of the University
v. Campbell 102
Voung v. Erwin 245
Dent v. Simmons 415
Dewey v. Dewev 338
v. Osborn 444, 455, 460
Dibble v. Roger 34
Diskey v. Armstrong's heirs 101
Dickenson v. Jackson ex dem. Caldwell 237
Dietrich v. Mateer 319
Dighton v. Greenvil 84
Doe v. Bradbury 142
v. Fleming 231
v. Johnson 287
v. M'Kinney 287
Lessee of Murra v. Northern 394
v. Owen 399
v. Bayne 204
v. Perkins 460
v. Roe 265, 278
v. Role 106
v. Thompson 50
Dorrell v. Johnson 141
Dow v. Plummer 51
Doe ex dem. Arden et al. v. Thompson
48, 50, 51
Beauland et al. v. Hirst, 309
Bedford et al. v. White 105
liv TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES.
Doe ex dem. Biddle v. Abrahams 115
Bland v. Smith 352
Burroughs v. Reade 311
Caldwell v. Thorpe 64
Calvert v. Frowd 156
Cates v. Somerville 145
Chapin v. Scott 230
Clark et al. v. Spencer 115
Clay et al. v. Woods et al. 260
Clinton et al. v. Campbell 35
Cliuton et al. v. Herring 79
Colclough etux. v. Hulse 62, 98
Colmere et al. v. Whitmore 312
Cook and Hardy v. Webb 105
Church Wardens and Overseers
of the Parish of Orlton v.
Harpur 394
Cuff v. Stradling 319
Davis v. Davis 51
Davies v. Reed 285
Davies et ux. v. Roe 385
Draper's Co. v. Wilson 388
Eden v. Rathbone 411,412
Foster et al. v. Scott 99, 111
Gigner v. Roe 88
Grocer's Co. v. Roe 411
Hallet et al. v. Forest et al. 64
Hanley v. Wood 149, 183
Harris v. Masters 191
Harding v. Cooke 310
Herman v. Pettett 89, 92
Harleton et al v. Butler ' 229
Holmes v. Dairy 177
Hughs v. Dyball 311
Ibletson et al. v. Laud 115
Jackson v. Wilkinson 314
James et al. v. Stanton 259
Laurie et al. v. Dyeball 28
Langdon v. Roulston 102
Lidgebird v. Lawson 303
Lewis et ux v. M'Farland et al.,
119, 231
Lewis v. Bingham 317, 363
Lord Darlington v. Cook, 265,
360
Lowden v. Watson 316
Lucy v. Bennett 300
Marston et al. v. Butler 229
Mayor, &c, of Maiden v. Miller,
305
Milner v. Brightwen 98
Minister, &c, of the Parish of
St. Julian v. Cowley 24
Morecraft et al. v. Meux 216
Morgan v. Roe 385
Newby v. Jackson 144
Nixen's Heirs v. Potts 231
Oldham et ux. v. Wolley 348
Paine v. Grundy 404
Palmer v. Andrews 315
Pearson v. Roe 256
Pitt v. Hogg 202
Pritchard et al. v. Lawyer 100
Rees v. Thomas 426
Doe ex dem. Robey v. Maisey 105
Saunders v. Cooper 309
Seabrook v. Roe 273
Smyth v. Smyth 119
Spencer et al. v. Reed 292
Sutton v. Ridgeway 426
Teveral v. Snee ' 260
Tindale v. Hemming 375, 378
The Governor of Hospital, &c,
v. Roe 266
Thompson et al. v. Clark 93
Truscott v. Elliott 48
Upton v. Witherwick 412
Watson, Clerk, v. Fletcher,
Clerk 126
Watson v. Jefferson 127
Webb v. Goundry 418,419
Williams v. Richardson 399
Williams v. Winch et al. 430
Doolittle et ux. v. Blakesly 87, 90
Dorrell v. Johnson 141
Dow v. Plummer 51
Dow v. Warren 99
Drane v. Hodges 14
Dube v. Smith 136
Duchane v. Goodtitle 119
Duffield 7. Stille 446, 455
Dunlap v. Duulap 336
Dunn v. Arney 336
Duvall et al. v. Bibb 229, 237
E.
Eades v. Rucker
Earl of Pomfret v. Lord Windsor
Easton v. Rucker
Edelen v. Hardy's Lessee
Edgerton v. Clarke
Eisenhart et al. v. Slaymaker
Eldon v. Doe
Ellice v. Britton
Elliot v. Bohannon
v. Britton
Ellice v. Paige
Ely v. Ballantine
Emerson v. Thompson et al.
Emlin v. Hoops
Estep & Hall's Lessee v. Weems
Evans v. Moram
Ex'r. of Hunter v. Spottswood,
135
84
319
330
459
355
33
229
229
229
145
229
407
285
354
266
84
Fairclaim ex dem. Empson v. Shackleton, 88
Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee 390
Farley v. Craig 20
Farmer's Loan and Trust Co. v. Kursch 404
Farrow v. Edmunson 156
Farrow v. Farrow 396
Faulkner v. Brockenborough 363
Fawkes v. Darnall 93
Faysoux v. Prather 99
TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES. lv
Fenn v. Stille 446
Fenner v. Dieplock et al. 42
Fenny ex dem. Masters v. Durant 353
Fenwick v. Floyd 241
Fenwick v. Floyd's Lessee 31
Fewell et ux. v. Collins 99
Fifty Associates v. Howland 148
Finlay et al. v. Humble et al. 99
Pitzhugh v. Anderson et al. 99
Fisher "et al. v. Larick 240, 241
Fishwick's Adm'r. v. Sewell 85
Fletcher v. Peck 56
Foote v. Colvin 311
Ford v. Wadsworth 400
Fort y. Palmerston 400
Foster v. Foster 382
Fouke et al. v. Kemp's Lessee 25, 241
Fowke v. Darnall 92
Fraser et al. Lessee v. Hall 248
M'Pherson et al. 60, 61
Freeman v. Oldham's Lessee 273
Frier et al. v. Jackson ex dem. Yan Al-len
381
Fuller v. Wadsworth 106, 147, 364
Gaines v. Buford
Galbraith et al. v. Fenton
Gallagher v. M'Nutt
Gardiner v. Schulkill Bridge Co.
Gause v. Wiley
Gay v. Moffit
Gayoso De Lemos v. Garcia
Gibson v. Seymour
Gill v. Cole
Gillet v. Stanley
Gilliland's Lessee v. Hana
Gilliland v. Morell
Giraud's Lessee v. Hughes
Gist et al. Representatives, &c, v. Heirs
of Cattell
Gist's heirs v. Robinet
Gitting's Lessee v. Hall
Glascock v. Smith & Hunt
Gloynoro v. Jones
Godard v. Railroad Co.
Goodright ex dem. Fowler et al. v. For-ester
Lessee, &c, v. Provost
Goodtitle ex dem. Duke of Norfolk v.
Notitle
Goodtitle ex dem. Mortimer v. Notitle
Gordon v. Overton
Gordon v. Pearson
Gore et al. v. Marshall et al.
Gould v. Newman
Gorham v. Brenon
Gover et al. Lessee v. Cooley
Graham et al. v. Moore et al.
Gratz et al. v. Benner
Gravier et al. v. Livingston et
Grebbin v. Davis
232
44, 120
305
414
120
55, 59
94
106
452
135
311
401, 406
26
94
54
319
281
41, 89, 90
272, 382
87
312
Green v. Chelsea
v. Liter et al.
Greeno v. Munson
Gregory v. Jackson
Greenleaf 's Lessee v. Birch
Greer v. Smith
Griffith v. Dicken
v. Dobson
Griffith's Exr. v. Griffith
Griffith v. Houston
Griffith's Heirs v. Wilson
Griswold v. Butler et ux.
Gubbs v. Ellis
Guthrie v. Lewis's Devisees
113
55
156
392
37
234
37
241
337
230
416
102
306
313
Haley v. Hickman 153
Hall v. Dewey , 156
Hall v. Mathias 51
et al. v. Powell 51,57,278
v. Doe ex dem. Surtees et al
39, 89
v. Gitting's Lessee
Hallet v. Eslava
Hambleton v. Wells
Hamilton v. Taylor
Hamit v. Lawrence
Hammond v. Ridgley's Lessee
Hanchet v. Whitney
Hand v. James
Hare v. Furey
Hargrove v. Powell
Harlock et al. v. Jackson
Harman v. James
Harrison v. Botts
v. Stevens
Hart's Heirs v. Benton's Heirs
Hawkins v. Hays
Hawkins' Lessee v. Middleton
Hawn v. Norris et al.
Heath et ux v. White
Heidehopper v. Burrows
Hemenway v. Gates, Admr., &c.
Henderson v. Hays
v. Overton
Hendrickson v. Hendrickson
Henege v, Elliott
Henley v. Bank
Herbert v. Alexander
Hicks et al. v. Rogers
Hickman's Lessee v. Dale
Higbee et al. v. Rice
Higginbotham et al. v. Fishback
Higginson v. Mein
Higginson, Survivor, &c, v. Air
Hill v. Barge
Hill v. Dyer
Hilton's Lessee v. Brown
Hinton v. M'Neel
Hockenbury v. Snyder
Hodgson et al. Assignee of Seton v. Gas-coigne
412
Hoey v. Furman 38
5
r
, 79
44
386, 378
92, 315
141
55, 420
143
349
448 449
36
55, 7
136
136 231
25
102
390
316
1, 240 241
98
245
84
44
354
298
25
105
288, 403
136, 231
410
54, 8£ , 89
40, 5 , 92
39, 61 , 89
al. 96
337
56
37
396
156
lvi TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES.
Hogeboom v. Hall 105
Holdfast v. Shephard 449
Hollis v. Pool 141
Holmes v. Seely 114, 305, 388
Holton v. Burton et al. 363
Holt's Lessee v. Smith 295
Hopkins v. M'Laren 420
&c, v. Stevens et al. 45
& "Watson v. "Ward et al. 47
et al. v. "Ward et al. 310, 394
Hord v. Bodley 55
Howard v. Gardiner 382
v. Moale et al. Lessee 382
Huddleston v. Garrett 33
Hudson v. Hudson's Adni'rs. 99
Huggins v. Ketchum 242
Hughes Lessee v. Howard 389
Humbert v. Trinity Church 135
Hunt v. Crawford 46, 127
Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee 250
Hurst's Lessee v. Jones 426
Hurten v. Wickersham 444
Hutchenson v. Horn 388
Hutching v. Talbot et al. Lessee 250
Hutchinson v. Hutchinson 86
Hylton's Lessee v. Brown 48, 459
I.
Ingraham v. Baldwin
Inmanv. Barnes
Innis v. Crawford
et al. v. Campbell
In the Matter of Robert's
Irish et al. v. Scovell
Irrell v. Harrington
Irvine v. Bull
Ives et al. v. Lott et al.
Jackson v. Andrews
v. Babcock
v. Caywood
v. Colden
v. Combe
v. Davis
v. Dennison
v. Esty
v. French
v. Goodtitle
v. Grant
v. Haines
v. Harper
v. Hawley
v. Hill
v. Hopkins
v. Leek
v. Leggett
v. Leslie
v. Long
v. Longhead
"Will
105
76
136
44
331
251
113
23
420
56
379
364
448, 457
105
308
3S8,
22'X
141
226
197
401
376
405, 414
56
364
377, 295
312, 376
105
56
364
Jackson v. Marsh 106
v. Matsdorf 311
v. McConnell 34, 105
v. M'Leod 141
v. Moncrief 153, 315
v. Newton 312
v, Parr 448
v. Paul 311
v. Potter 295
v. Randall 455, 456
v. Rathbone 405
v. Rowland 376
v. Salmon 143
v. Salisbury 267
v. Schauber 298
v. Schoonmaker 98
v. Selliek 98
v. Sidney 230
v. Silvernail 197
v. Sisson 311
v. Spear 105, 376
v. Stackhouse 364
v. Stafford 364
V. Stanbury 377
v. Stiles 226, 286, 288, 401
v. Stone 451
v. Thompson 401
v. Travis 386
v. Tuttle 408
v. "Warford 56, 379
v. Whitlock 44
v. "Wood 443
v. "Wyckooff 191
ex dem. Abby v. Smith 246
Aikins et al , v. Bank-raft
246, 382
Allen v. Bell 306
Antell et ux., v. Brown 35
Austin et al., v. Howe
et al. 14
Barclay et al., v. Hop-kins
147
Beach v Durland 342
Beach v Stafford 147
Beaver v. Stiles 258, 273
Beekman v. Selliek 98
Beekman et al, v.
Haviland 408
Bennett v. Lamson 147
Benton t, Langhead 147
Blanchard v. Allen 194,
198
Bleeker v. Whitford
41, 42, 313
Bond v. Root 344
Bonnel v. Wheeler 35
Bonnel e t al., v. Foster
229, 306
Bowen v. Burton 60, 144
Bowen v. Christman 349
Bowne v . Hinman 40, 313
Bradt et al., v. Whit-lock
88
Brinkerhoff v. Stiles 299
TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES. lvii
Jackson ex d.em. Brott et al., v. Hunt 40
Brown et al., v. Ayres
41, 90, 315
Browns v. Betts 350
Bugbee et al. 299
Burhans v. Blanshau 347
Burr et al., v. Sherman 308
Butler t. Ditz 246
Cantine v. Stiles 300
Carr v. Green 147
Carson et al., v. Carnes
et al. 103
Church v. Hills 375, 459
Church v. Miller 144, 153
Church et al. v. Brown-son
203, 186. 198
Clark v. Babcock 289
Clark v. Clark 426
Clark v. Randall 112
Clowes v. Hakes 195
Coe v. Kniffen 331
Colden v. Agan 203
Colden v. Brownell 203
Colden v. Rich 203
Colden et al. v. Moore
94, 102
Colden et al. v. Paul 36
Cooden v. "Woods 342
Corson et al. v. Cairns
et al. 58, 62, 63
Cramer v. Stiles 400, 402
Curtis v. Bronson 36
Davy v. De Watts 40,
315
De Forest et al. v. Ram-say
305
Denniston et al. v. Den-niston
297, 342
Deridder v. Rogers 174
Dill et al. v. Tyler 141
Doually et al. v. Walsh 196
Dox v. Jackson 39, 61, 89
Dunbar et al. v. Todd 37
Duncan et al. v. Har-der
38, 311
Eden et al. v. Varick et
al. 330
Ewing et al. v. Busk-nell
400
Farmer's Turnpike Co.
v. Stiles 296
Ferris v. Fuller 141, 147
Finch v. Kough 246
Fisher v. Creal et al. 58,88
Fitzroy et al. v. Sample
141, 232
G-arland v. Browner 340
Gouverneur et al. v. Stiles
425
Goodrich et al. v. Ogden
379, 399
Goose etal. v. Demarest 195
Griswold et al. v. Bard 40,
89, 90
Jackson ex dem. Haines et al. v. Woods et al.
392
Hallenbeck et al. v. Mc-
Clasky 224
Harris et al. v. Murray et al.
245
Haverley et ux. v. French
62
Henderson v. Davenport 47,
381, 393, 443
Henry v. Thompson 343,
347
Herrick v. Babcock 329, 352
Hill v. Sheeter 40, 58
Hills v. Tuttle 107, 249, 409
420
Howard v. Halloway 350,
352
Howland v. Stiles 249
Humphrey et al. v. Giv-en
et al. 376
Hunt et al. v. Luquere,
343, 347, 348
Jackaway v. Stiles 286
Jauncey v. Cooper 293
Johnson et al. v. Deck-er
307
Jones v. Lyons 297
June v. Raymond 51,87
Kanes v. Sternbergh 42, 91
Kelly et al. v. Belknap 246
Kemball et al. v. Van
Slyck 44
Ketchum v. Townsend 312
King v. Burtiss et al. 36
King v. Catlins 20
Klein v. Graham 41, 42, 91,
314
Klock et al. v. Hudson 37,
38, 39, 56
Lathrop et al. v. De-mont
35, 44
Legrange v. Lagrange 342,
343
Lewis et al. v. Laroway 347
Lewis et ux. v. Shutz 193
Livingston v. Baker 161
v. Bryan 143
v. Burton 343
v. Clarke 400
V. Groat 193,
202
V. Edwards 400,
425, 426
v. Kip 194, 197
v. Kissel-brack
308
v. Niven 146
v. Sclover 311
v. Walker 315
v. Wilsey 146
v. Wilson 141
Livingston et al. v. De-lancey
39, 329
TABLE OF CASES CITED IN THE NOTES.
Jackson ex dem. Livingston et al. v. Hal-lenbeck
94
v. Ro-bins
102
v. Sclo-ver
246
Locksell et al. v. "Whee-ler
141, 156
Loomis v. Stiles 296
Loop et al. v. Harring-ton
39, 44
Loux et al. v. Buel 20, 23
Low et al v. Reynolds 40,
41, 89, 246, 312, 382
Lowell v. Parkhurst 312.
380
Malin v. G-arnsey 377
Malin v. Malin 331
Martin v. Pratt 39
Marvin et al. v. Hotch-kiss
92
Masters v. Bush 314
McCrea v. Mancius 62, 99
Mentz v. Stiles 281
Miller v. Hixon 112
Minor v. Boneham 380
Minkler v. Minkler et al. 39
Montressor et al. v. Rice 342
Moore v. Van Bergen 409
Murray et al. v. Denn 311
v. Hazen
311, 392
Myers v. Ellsworth 196
Nellis v. Dysling 379
Norris et al. v. Smith 315
Norton v. Sheldon 198, 199
Norton v. Stiles 281
Ostranderv. Hasbrouck
409
v. Rown 144
Palmer et al. v. Travis 246
Pearson v. II ousel 329
People v. Pierce 40
Phillips v. Aldrich 141
Pioneer et al. v. Schau-ber
298
Potter v. Sisson 44
Preston et al. v. Smith 316
Prinder v. Lytle 405
Prindle v. Lytle 296
v. Styles 296
Quackenboss v. Dennis 246
v. "Wood-ward
278, 302
Randall v. Davis 36,378
Ronsslaer v. "Whitlock 54
Rogers v. Potter 352
Roberts v. Ives 295
Roman et al. v. Sidney
232, 233
Rosekransv. Stiles 281,409
Roosevelt et al. v. Stack-house
148, 317, 362
Ross v. Cooley 379
Jackson ex dem. Russell et al. v. Croy
41, 89, 90
Sager et al. v. Stiles 285
Salisbury v. Salsbury 261
Saxton v. May 20, 23
Schoonmaker 98
Schuyler v. Corlis 197, 205
Scofieldv. Collins 42,
91, 388
Seeley v. Morse 38,377
Simmons et al. v. Chase 147
Sinclair et al. v. Bailey 247
Sinsabaugh et al. v. Sears
58, 62
Sitzer v. "Waltermire 112
Sleight v. Hasbrouck 36
Smith v. M'Connell 307
Smith et al. v. Pierce 44
v. Stewart
40, 196, 315
v. Stiles 295
v. Wilson 195
Southampton et al. v.
Cooley 313
Sutherland et al. v. Stiles
247, 281, 411
Sparkman v. Porter
34, 55, 56, 311
Starr et ux. v. Rich-mond
246, 311
Stevens v. Silvernail 202
Stevens v. Stevens 58,
62, 376
Stewart v. Kingsley 142
Stewart v. Town 34, 117
Swartwout et ux. v.
Cole 89,316,323,324
Swartwout et ux. v.
Johnson 14, 40, 92,
98, 99, 298, 317
Swartwout et ux. v.
Stiles 298
Ten Eyck et al. v.
Frost 289
Thomas v. Tibbitts 206
Van Alen v. Rogers
48, 51,55,87, 141
Van Allen v. Visscher
278, 302
v. Vosburgh
41, 308, 313,316
Van Beuren et al. v.
Vosburgh 324
Van Cortlandt v. Park-hurst
et al. 141
Vandenberg et al. v.
Bradt 141, 231
Van Dusen v. Van Du-sen
330, 343, 347
Van Dusen et al. v.
Scissam 312
Vanderwerker v. Stiles
286, 299
TABLE OP CASES CITED IN THE NOTES- lix
Jackson ex dem. Van Rensslaer v. An- Jinkins v. Noel 35
drew 194 Job v. Tebbats 241
v. Col- Johnson v. Irwin 79
lins 195 v. M'Intosh 56
v. Ho- Jones, adm.'r, &e., v. Brodie, adm'r. &c. 100
gaboom 195, 316 Jones v. Maffet et ux. 119
Van Shaick et al. v. v. Perkins 37 135
Davis 40, 41, 49, 87, v. Porter 26
89, 90, 93, 308, 312,
313, 315
Van Vechten v. Sill 352 K.
Vrely & Clark v. Guer-den
41, 90, 313, 141 Kane v. Bloodgood 84
Vrooman et al. v. Keary v. Goodwin 145
Haines 402 Kelsey v. Hamner 234
Vrooman v. Smith 278 Kemp v. Commonwealth 79
Waggoner et al. v. Mur- Keneda Appell v. Gardner Gibb 278
pley 316 Kenedy v. Bogert et al. 313
Walker v. Flint 288 et al. v. Bruice 102
Walsh v. Col den 147 v. Heirs of M'Cartnej 456
Watson v. Smith 36 Kennedy's heirs v. Duncan 101
v. Cris 39 376 King v. Bullock 158
Webber et al. v. Har- Kinney v. Beverley 382
sen et al. 93,312, 313 Kinsley v. Ames 141
Weidman v. Hubble Kipp v. Norton 34
311, 317 Kirk et al. v. Smith ex dem. Penn 61, I
Welden v. Harrison Kline v. Beebee 317
193, 196, 202 Knaub v. Eseek 362
Whitbeck et al. v. Deyo 156 Knox et al. v. Hook 92
White v. Carey 308, 376 Koonis v. Hartman 42
Wickham v. Belnap 36
Williams et al. v. Miller
90, 308 L.
Wills et al. v. Stiles 314
Winter v. M'Evoy 286 287 La Frombois v. Jackson 56
Winthrop v. Waters 36 Lamb v. Coe 35
Witherell et al. y. Jones Lamer v. Jones 94
117, 353 Lander v. Reynolds 417
Wood v. Harrow 289 Lane et al. v. Reynard 43
v. Salmon 182 Lane's Lessee v. Osment 141
v. Stiles 423 Langdon v. Potter et al. 42, 57, 91
v. Wood et al. 302 Langendyck et ux. v. Burhans 295, 297,
Woodhull v. Rurnsey 331 448, 449 455
Wright et al. v. Dieffen- Langford's adm'r. v. Gentry 100
dorf 311, 391 Laneford v. Turner 416
Teates et al. v. Hath- Larue's Heirs v. Slack et al, 230 231
away 23 Lee v. Flannagan 295
Young et al. v. Camp 92 v. Tapscott 392
Young & Devereux v. Lefevre v. Murdock 25
Camp 92 Leland v. Tousey 443
Young et al. v. Ellis et Lenoir v. South 388
al. 87 Leonard et al. v. Leonard 88
Young et al. v.Vreden- Lessee of Allen v. Lyons 43
burgh 310, 311, 386 Bavard v. Colfax et al. 15.
Zimmerman v. Zimmer- 45 380 385
man 379 Bell v. Levers 86
Jack v. Dougherty 37 Binney v. The Chesapeake and
Jamas v. Bennett 382 Ohio Canal Co. 229
et al. Lessee v. Boyd 380 Brown v. Galloway 252, 448, 451
Jane v. Price 311 Burkharst et al. v. Row et al. 298
Jauncey v. Thorne 337, 339 Carmac v. Allaire 412
Jewell v. Harrington 113 Campbell v. Harper et al. 268,
v. Sample 136 272, 278
Jenkins v. Robinson 140 v. Sproat 230
lx TABLE OP CASES CITED IN THE NOTES.
Lessee of Cherry v. Robinson 421
Dawson v. Porter 38
Delancey v. M'Kean 42, 43
Poster v. Joice 43
Perguson v. Smallman 237
Galloway v. Ogle 41, 89
Hall v. Vandegrift 98, 99
Holt's Heirs v. Hemphill's
Heirs 38, 48
Huydekoper v. Barrows 391
Learning v. Case 378
Lloyd v. Giddings 45
Lynn et al. v. Downes 243
Mather v. Akewright 44
Milligau v. Dickson 37
Mobley et al. v, Ocker 102
Mursies' Heirs v. Long 229
Neilly v. M'Cormick 99
Packer v. Gonsalus 309
Patton et al. v. Cooper 230, 242
Penn v. Kline et al. 460
Phelps v. Butler 42
Ruggan et al. v. Phillips et al. 252
Rugge v. Ellis 48
Smith et v. Buchanan 120
Spencer v. Mackle 44
Swayze v. Burke 44
Thomas v. Newton 423
Tan Horn v. Chesnut 37
Walker v. Coulter 43
Willink v. Miles 37, 45
Woods v. Galbreath 251
Lethieullier v. Tracy 58, 59
Leverus Lessee v. Murdock 113
Lewis v. Goguette 35
Lion ex derm Eden et al. v. Burtis 87, 250
Little v. Bishop 391
v. Gardner 105
v. Libby 53
v. Megquier 50, 54
Livingston v. Peru Iron Co. 56, 311
Lloyd v. Cozens 143
v. Gordon et ux. 89
Lloyd's Lessee v. Hemsley 14
Logan v. Herron 143
Long v. Moreton 410
Love v. Simm's Lessee 43
Love v. Powel 445
Lowe v. Joliffe 349
Luckhatt v. Dunn et al. 96
Lyman v. Mower 147, 450
Lynch ads. Withers 6
Lyons v. Miller 240, 393
Lytle v. Fen 259
M.
Machir et al. v. May et al. 100
Maekay et al. v. Moore, Exr. 336
Magruder v. Peter 230, 233
Maidstone v. Stevens 196
Markes et ux. v. Bryant et ux.
Maris v. Simple •156
Marquis Cholmondeley et al. v. Lord
Clinton et al. 54
Marshall v. Wood 261, 363
Marshall v. Dupey 310, 455
Marsteller et al. v. M'Clean 102
Martin v. Willink 183
v. Woods 98
Marvin v. Dennison 260
Mather v. The Ministers of Trinty Church
et al. 51, 57
Mathews v. Ward 46, 127
v. Ward's Lessee 127
Matter of Watkin's Widow 1 1
2
Gardiner v. Spikeman 112
Nan Mickel 329, 350
Mattox et al. v. Helm 303
Man's Lessee v. Montgomery 250
Maynard's Lessee v. Cable 37, 153
Mayor, &c, of Havana v. Steamboat Co.
of Geo. 124
May's Heirs v. Bennett 100, 101
v. Hill 100
v. Slaughter 101, 350
Maxwell v. King 391
Medley v. Medley 382, 404
v. Williams 26
Meldrum v. Jarvis 228
Mercer v. Watson 390
Melvin v. Proprietors of Locks, &c. 51
Merritt et al. v. Thompson 287
Michael v. Nutting 43
Mickle v. M'Farland 382
Middletown Savings Bank v. Bates 106, 120
Miller v. M'Brier 41, 43
v. Shackford 243
Milne v. Cummings 232
Mitchell v. Preedley 459
v. Glover 242
v. Smith 416
v. Stevens 127
Moak v. Johnson 114
Montgomery v. Craig 156
Moore v. Beasley 143
v. Burnet 47
v. Gilliam 330
v. Pearce 105
Morgan v. Yari