Digest of the Alabama reports

              RALPH BROWN DRAUGHON
LIBRARY
he
n.
^fl'^ Pi:
Digitized by the Internet' Archive
in 2010 with funding from
Lyrasis IVIembers and Sloan Foundation
http://www.archive.org/details/digestofalabamarOOshep
Q
DIGEST
ALABAMA REPORTS,
FROM THE
17tli to tlie 29 th VoUime, IS". S.,
INCLUSIVE.
BY J. W. SHEPHERD.
MONTGOMERY:
BARRETT & WIMBISH, BOOK AND JOB PRINTERS
•^ ^^91^
^1^ 9VIMN DtiAUflOT^^yft
A
»"" *« 't!
APP 2 4 'ft
BGC
TA.BLE OF CA_SES.
Abercrombie ats. Beattie, 18 Ala. 9
V. Allen, 29 " 281
Abercrombie's Executor v.
Abercrombie's Heirs, 27 " 489
Abernathy V. Boazman, 24 " 189
Abnej V.Pickett, 21 " 739
Acre ats. Holley, 23 " 603
Acre & Jolinsbn v. Hunt &
Frowner 28 " 580
Adams ats. Adams and Wife,26 " 272
ats. 29 " 433
ats. Cook, 27 " 294
ats. Davis, 18 " 264
ats. Holland, 21 " 680
V. Garrett & Garrett,22 " 602
V. McKenzie, 18 « 698
ats. Steele, 21 " 534
Aday v. Echols, 18 " 353
Adkins ats. White, 18 " 636
Adkinson v. Keel, 25 " 551
Agee V. The State, 25 " 67
V.Williams, 27 " 644
Agee& Agee V. Medlock,..25 " 281
Ala. Coal Mining Co. ats.
Steamboat Empire, 29 " 698
Ala. Life Insurance & Trust
Co . V. Pettway, 25 " 544
Ala. k, Tenn. Rivers Rail-road
Co. V. Burke, . . 27 " 535
ats. Connoly, 29 " 373
V. Harris, 25 " 232
v.Kidd, 29 " 221
Albertson, Douglass & Co.
V. Goldsby, 28 " 711
Aldridgev. Br. Bk. Decatur,17 " 45
Alexander ats. Derrett,.. . .25 " 265
V. Fisher and Wife,18 " 374
V. Trask, 20 " 805
Allen ats. Abercrombie,. . .29 " 281.
V.Greene, 19 " 34
V. Harper, 26 " " «06«
Allen V. Smith, 22 Ala. 41
C
Allen and Wife v. Raney
and Wife 19 " 68
Allison ats. McClellan, 19 " 671
Allman v. Gann, 29 '• 240
Amason V, Nash, 19 " 104
V , 24 " 279
Anders ats. Kirby's Adm'r,26 " 466
ats. Smith, 21 " 782
Anderson ats. Couch, 26 " 676
V.Knox, 20 " 156
V.Rice 20 " 239
Andress ats. Bradley, 27 " 596
V. Broughton, 21 " 200
V.Roberts, ,..18 " 387
Andrews ats. Andrews, 28 " 432
ats. Hall's Distribu-tees
17 " 40
v.Hobson's Adm'r,.23 " 219
V. Union Bk. Tenn.,.21 " 576
Andrews' Heirs v. Brown's
Adm'r 21 " 437
Andrews and Wife, Ex
parte, 19 " 582
Anthony V. The State, 29 " 27
Antonez V. , 26 " 81
Any ats. Dickinson & Winn,25 " 424
Appleton ats. Moore, 26 " 633
V. Turrentine, 19 " 706
Armistead ats. Maulden,
Montague &; Co., 18 " 500
ats. Smith, Dabney
&Co., 17 " 282
Armour ats. Fowler &Prout,24 " 194
Armstrong ats. Chastang's
Heirs, 20 '• 609
V. Holley, 29 " 305
V, Hufishitler, 19 '• 51
V. Pugh, 19 • 209
Armstrong's Executor v.
•i^Armstrong^'s Heirs 29 " 538
IV TABLE OF CASES.
Arnold v. The State, .25 Ala.
V. , 29 "
Arrington V. Burton 19 "
V. Hair, 19 "
ats. Livingston,. .. .28 "
Arthur V. The State, 22 "
Ashby ats. Stein, 24 "
Ashley's Adni'r v. Robinson,29 "
Askew V. Hooper, 28 "
Aston V. Jemison, 17 "
Attkisson v. Attkisson,. . .17 "
Attorney-General ats. Hoole
&Paullin 22 "
Atwood's Adm'r V. Wright,29 "
Atwood's Heirs v. Beck,. . .21 "
Autrey's Executor ats. Den-son
and Wife, 21 "
Averett ats. Hill, 27 "
ats. Horn, 20 «
V. , 19 "
Avery v. Hair, 28 "
Awbrey ats. Smith & Garey,19 "
Baalam v. The State, 17 Ala,
Baber's Adni'rs ats. Fergu-son
& Scott, 24 "
Bachelder ats. Dickson, .... 21 "
Bagby v. Baker, 18 "
V.Reeves, 20 "
Bailej^ ats. Pearson, 23 "
Baker ats. Bagby,. .. . 18 "
V. Chastang's Heirs, .18 "
V. Gregory and Wife,28 "
Balfour's Adm'r ats. Carter,19 "
Ball ats. Huggins, 19 "
Bancroft ats. Gayle, 17 "
Bancroft's Adm'r ats. 22 "
ats. Gayle & Riggs, 22 "
Bank Br. Decatur ats. Ald-ridge,
17 "
V. Hodges,..17 "
.V. McCollum,20 "
V. Moseley,..19 "
ats. Murrah,.20 "
ats. Price,.. .17 "
ats. Snodgrass,25 "
Iluntsville ats. Hous-ton,
25 "
ats. Taylor,..21 "
Mobile ats. Brough-ton,
17 "
ats. Burnett,22 "
V. Coleman, . 20 "
ats. Colomb
& Iselin. 18 "
ats.CMllum..23 "
ats. Douglass
& Easton, 19 "
69
46
114
243
424
61
521
112
364
61
256
190
346
590
205
484
719
803
267
63
451
402
699
653
427
537
653
417
544
814
587
351
316
648
45
42
280
222
392
374
161
250
581
642
140
454
797
659
Br. Bk. Mobile ats. Elliott, . .20 Ala.
ats. Fry,.... 23 "
. ats. Geyer,..21 "
v.McDonald,22 "
ats. Minter &
Gayle, 23 "
^^
v.Robertson,19 "
ats. Smith's
Heirs, 21 "
Montgomery ats.
Brown,...20 "
ats. Brewer,. 24 "
ats. Hooks,. 18 "
ats. Lanier,. 18 "
ats. McDon-nell,
20 "
ats. McKen-zie,
28 "
V. Parrish, . . 20 "
ats. Sartor, . .29 "
ats . Taliafer-ro's
Adm'r,..23 "
State ats. Deloach,. 27 "
ats. Foster,. . .17 "
ats. Griffin,. . .17 "
ats. Gunnells,.18 "
ats. Hullum, . . 18 "
ats. James,. .. .17 "
v.Seawell, 18 "
of Geogia ats. Cos-ter's
Executors,. . .24 "
of Mobile ats. Stan-ley,
23 '••
of St. Mary's v. St.
Jolin, Powers & Co.,25 "
of Tennessee v .Ben-ham,
23 "
P. &M.ats. Jemison,17 "
ats. ,...23 "
ats. Saltmarsh,.17
Banks, Ex parte, , ... 28
,
, 28
ats. Conner, 18
ats. Fowler, 21
v. McDongald's Ad'r 29
ats. White, 21
Baptiste ats. Rives, 25
Barclay ats. Dixon, 22
ats. Moore, 18
23
17
27
19
18
ats.
v. -
Barefield ats. Murph3%. .
Barfield ats. Hunt & Hunt,
.
Barkley ats. Crawford,. .
.
Barlow v. Lambert, 28
Barnard ats. May, 20
Barnes v. Mayor of Mobile,19
ats. ^lobley, 26
v. , 21
345
770
414
474
762
798
125
420
439
451
625
313
606
433
353
755
437
672
258
676
805
69
616
652
566
143
754
168
761
28
89
42
679
75
705
382
370
672
739
634
634
117
270
704
200
707
718
232
TABLE OF CASES.
Barnes ats. Prince, 20 Ala. 21
9
ats. Williams, 28 " C13
Barnett ats. Kyle, 17 " 306
Barnett's Executor v. Tar-rence,
23 « 463
Barney v.Earle, 20 " 405
ats. Martin, 20 " 369
ats. Skinner, 19 " 698
Barrett ats. Lankford'sAd'r,29 " 700
V. The State, 24 " 74
Barringer V. Bnrke, 21 " 735
Barron v. Tartt 18 " 668
V. , 19 " 78
Barrow ats. Gunn, 17 " 743
Barry ats. Napier, 24 " 511
Bartol V. Calvert, ..... 21 " 42
Bates ats. Eckles & Brown,26 " 655
ats. Prince, 19 " 105
Batre V. The State, 18 " 119
Battle ats. Evans, 19 " 398
Baxter ats. Shipman 21 " 456
Beach ats. Bostwick & Kirk-land,
18 " 80
Beall &Co. V. Ridgeway,..18 " 117
Bean v. Welsh, 17 " 770
Beard ats. Wilson, 19 " 629
Beasley v. The State, 18 " 535
Beason ats. Brown, 24 " 466
Beattie v. Abercrombie,. . .18 " 9
Beavers v. Davis, 19 " 82
ats. Lampley 25 " 534
Beck ats. Atwood's Heirs,. 21 " 590
ats. Boyd, 29 " 703
V. Barnett, 22 " 822
ats.Pryor, 21 " 393
ats. Reese, 24 " 651
Becton v. Ferguson, 22 " 599
Beene's Heirs v. Randall's-
Heirs, 23 " 514
Beers ats. Shaw, 25 " 449
Beers & Smith v. Fontaine
& Dent 19 " 722
Beeson v. Wiley, Banks &
Co., 28 " 575
Bell ats. Evans, 20 " 509
ats. Harris, 27 " 520
ats. Knight, 22 " 198
Bell & May v. Miller & Co., 27 " 515
Ben (slave) v. TJie State,. . .22 " 9
Benbow ats. McLemore,. . .19 " 76
Bendall's Distributees v.
Bendall's Adm'r 24 " 295
Benford v. Daniels, 20 " 445
Benhara v. Bank of Tennes-see,.
.. 23 " 143
ats. Kirkman, Aber-natliy
& Hanna,. .. .28 " 501
ats. Savage, 17 " 119
Benje v. Creagh's Adnrr,. .21 " 151
Bennett v. Fail & Patterson, 26 Ala. 605
Benning V. Nelson, 23 " 805
Benson ats. Palmer, 19 " 594
Bentley v. Clcaveland, 22 " 814
Berghaus ats. Couthway,. .25 " 393
Beroujohn v. Mayor of Mo-bile,
27 " 58
Beroujon ats. Strong, 18 " 168
Berry ats. Lowremore,. . . .19 " 130
ats. Nave 22 " 382
Bettis v. Saint, 28 " 214
Betts v. Betts, 18 " 787
Beverly V. Stephens, 17 " 701
Bevil ats. Yarner, 17 " 286
Beville v. Reese, 25 " 451
Bice ats. Palmer, 28 " 430
Diddle ats. Larkins, 21 " 252
Bigelow V. Ward, 29 " 471
Bilberry ats. Mobley, 17 " 428
V. , 20 " 260
Bilberry's Adm'r v. Mobley,21 " 277
Bill (slave) v. The State,. . .29 " 34
Billingsley V. Bil]ingsley,..24 " 518
ats. Harris, 18 '• 438
V. 17 " 214
ats. Mitchell, 17 " 391
Binford v. Binford, 22 " 682
Bird V. Bohannon's Adm'r, 25 " 279
ats. Emanuel, 19 " 596
ats.Saltmarsh 19 " 665
V. Wooley, 23 " 717
Bishop's Heirs V.Hampton, 19 " 792
Bisquayats.Camack, 18 " 286
Black's Adm'r ats. Black's
Creditors, 20 " 401
ats. Henry, .. .24 " 417
Black's Executors ats. Mar-tin,
20 " 309
ats. 21 " 721
Blackburn V. Minter, 22 " 613
Blackwilder V. Loveless.. ..21 " 371
Blair & Co. ats. Godbold,. .27 " 592
Blann V. Crocheron 19 " 647
V. , 20 " 320
Blassingame ats. Walker,. .17 ' 810
Blevins V. Buck, 26 '• 292
Blocker's Adm'r ats. Jen-nings,
25 " 415
Blount ats. Ewing, 20 " 694
ats. Foster, 18 " 687
V.Hawkins, 19 " 100
V. McNeill 29 " 473
Blount&Skeltonats.\Vhite,22 " 697
Boaz ats. Hardy, 29 " 168
Boazman ats. Abernathy,. .24 " 189
ats. Callahan.. .
.'.
. .21 " 246
Bob (slave) V. The State,.. 29 " 20
Bobe V. Frowner and Wife, 18" 89
Bogle V. Bogle's Adm'r,. . .23 " 544
VI TABLE OF CASES.
Bohannon v. Chapman,. . . .17
Bohannon's Adm'r ats. Bii-d,25
Boling's Heirs v. Boling's
Executors, 22
Boiling ats. Walker, 22
ats. Wright, 27
Boiling & Boiling ats. Es-lava's
Heirs, 22
Boltze V. The State, 24
Bondurant ats. Nelson,. . . .26
V. Sibley's Heirs,. ..29
Boney v. Hollingswortli,. . .23
Bonham ats. Walton, 24
Bonner ats. Pace and Wife, 27
Boothe ats. Petty, 19
Boring v. Williams, 17
Bostwick & Kirkland v.
Beach, 18
Boswell V. Morton, 20
Bott V. McCoy & Johnson, 20
Boullemet.v.The State 28
Bower v. Saltmarsh, 19
Bower & Co. ats. ,. . .22
Boxley v. Gayle, 19
Boyd V. Beck, 29
ats. Parsons, 20
Boyd's Adm'rs ats. Crow,. .17
Boykin v. Edwards, 21
V. Kernochan, 24
V. Rain, 28
Boykin, McRae & Foster v.
Collins, ...20
Boyles ats. Johnson, 26
Bozeraan's Executors ats.
Stow, ..29
Brack ats. Coster, 19
Bradford v. Harper, 25
ats. Lundie, 26
ats. McLaren, Ragan
&Co., 26
ats. Rogers, 29
ats. Stewart, 26
Bradford and Wife v. Green-way,
Henry & Smith,. .17
Bradley v. Andress, 27
ats. Morton, 27
Brady v. O'Reilly's Adm'r, 28
Brainard v. McDevitt, 21
Braley V, Clark, 22
~ V. Peck & Clark,. , .18
Bransford ats. Wells, 28
Brantley ats. Crosby, 20
ats. Gunn, 21
V , 29
V. The State, 27
V. West, 27
ats. Witherington,. .18
Brantly v. Swift 24
Brattoii V. McGIothlen,. . . .20
Ala. 697
" 279
" 826
" 294
« 259
" 721
" 89
" 341
" 570
" 690
" 513
" 307
" 633
" 510
" 80
" 235
" 578
" 83
" 274
" 221
" 151
" 703
" 112
" 51
" 261
" 697
« 332
" 230
" 576
« 397
" 210
" 337
" 512
« 616
" 474
" 410
" 797
" 596
" 640
" 530
" 119
" 361
" 436
" 200
" 287
" 633
" 387
" 44
" 542
" 197
" 390
" 146
Brazier& Co. v. Burt 18 Ala. 201
Brennan's Adm'r v. Harris,20 " 185
Brewer v. Branch Bank
Montgomery 24 " 439
V. Brewer & Logan, 19 " 481
ats. Strong's Execu-tors,
17 " 706
Brewin & Boggan ats. Jor-dan,
19 " 238
Bridge & Co. v. McCullough's
Adm'r, 27 " 661
Bridges & Co. V.Phillips,.. 25 " 136
Briggs ats. Faver & Mount, 18 ," 478
Bright ats. Pike, 29 " 332
Brister (slave) V. The State, 26 « 107
Britton ats. Stone, 22 « 543
Broadnax V. Sullivan, 29 " 320
Brock V. The State, 26 " 104
Brooks V. Governor, 17 " 806
V. Hildreth k Mose-ley,
22 " 469
ats. Kelly, 25 " 523
V. Kirby, 19 " 72
V. McFarland, 20 " 483
Broome v. Carry's Adm'rs, 19 " 805
Broughton ats. Andress,... 21 " 200
ats. Br. Bk. Mobile, 17 " 828
Brown v. Beason, 24 " 466
V. Branch Bank
Montgomery 20 " 420
ats. Gray's Execu-tors,
22 « 262
ats. Haden, 18 " 641
ats. , 22.
" 572
V. Harrison & Rob-inson,
17 " 774
V. Higginbottom, ... 1
9
" 207
V. Johnson, 17 " 232
V. Jones, 24 " 463
ats. Lang, 21 " 179
V. Lyon & O'Neal,.. 17 " 659
V. Mayor of Mobile,23 " 722
ats. O'Neal, 21 " 482
ats. , 20 " 510
ats. Rcrabert&Hale,17 " 667
ats. Riddle 20 " 412
V. The State, ,27 " 47
ats. Steele, 18 " 700
ats. Trulove, 21 " 544
ats. Whitehead, ... .18 '• 682
Brown's Adm'r ats. An-drews'
Heirs, 21 " 437
Brown and Wife v. Clements
& Hunt, 24 " 354
Broxson ats. Yonge, 23 " 684
Brnce V.Barnes, 20 " 219
Bryan v. Smith 22 " 534
V. The State, 26 " 65
V. AV'are, 20 " 687
TABLE OF CASES. Vll
Bryan v. Wilson, 27
Bryan and Wife ats. Weems,21
V. ,..29
V. ,..25
Bryan & McPhail v. Cowart,21
Bryant v. Young & Hall,. .21
Bryant & Walker ats. Dar-ling,
17
Buck ats. Blevine, 25
Buckley ats. Jones, 19
Bugbee ats. Howard, 25
Bull ats. Simmons, 21
Bumgardner v. Taylor,. . . .28
Bunklej^ ats. Gerald and
Wife, 17
Bunyard and Wife v. McEl-roy,
21
Burden ats. Jones & Blair,. 20
V. Mayor of Mobile,21
ats. Stein, ...19
ats. , 24
fits. , 29
V. , 25
V. , 27
Burdine v. The State, 25
Burke ats. Ala. & Tenn. Riv-ers
Railroad Co., 27
ats. Barringer, 21
ats. Daily, 28
Burks ats. Mounger, 17
Burleson ats. G-illes^Die's
Adm'r, 28
Burnett V. Beck, 22
V. Br. Bk. Mobile, . . 22
Burnhatn ats. Kern, 28
Burns v. Taylor, 23
Burt ats. Brazier & Co., .... 1
8
Burton ats. Arrington,. . . .19
V. HoUey, 29
V. Holly, 18
ats. Dickens, 23
Bush, Ex parte, 29
V. The State, 18
Bush & Co. V. Jackson, 24
Butler V. The State, 22
ats.Strother's Adm'r,17
Byrd v. McDaniel, 26
Byrne v. McDow, 23
Bythwood V. The State,... 20
Ala. 208
302
423
195
92
264
10
292
604
548
501
170
311
382
309
715
130
127
455
104
60
535
735
328
48
5.51
822
642
428
255
201
114
318
408
849
50
415
273
43
733
582
404
47
Cadenhead ats. Willis, 28 " 472
Cahuzac & Co. v. Samini,. .29 " 288
Cain V. Penix, 29 " 374
'Caldwell ats. Gingles, 21 " 444
ats. Shomo, 21 " 448
Calhoun ats. Davis, 24 " 437
ats. , 24 " 455
Calhouu ats. McCartney,. . .17
Callahan v. Boazman , 21
Calvert ats. Bartol, 21
ats. Hogan's Ex'r,. .21
V. Marlow, 18
ats. Wilson, 18
Camack v. Bisquay, 18
Cameron ats. Lockhart and
Wife, 29
Camp ats. Dill, 22
v.-^ , 27
ats. Donley, 22
ats. Ferryman, 24
V. The State, 27
Campbell ats. Doss, 19
V. , 17
Ex parte, 20
V. Governor, 17
ats. Grier, 21
ats. Hagadon, 24
V. The State, 17
V. , 23
ats. Waller, 25
Cannon ats. McConico,. . . .25
Cannte and Wife ats. Hall,. 22
Cantrell ats. Wilson, 19
Capehart & Harbin ats. Mc-
Call's Adm'r, 20
Caple V. McCollum, 27
Capps ats. Rainey, 22
Caraway ats. Gildersleeve,. 1
9
Cardwell ats. Stodder, 20
Carey ats. Evans, 29
V. Hughes, 17
V. McDougald's Ad'r,25
V. ,..27
Carlisle ats. Harvey, 23
ats. Leverett's Heirs,19
V. Perrine, 19
Caroline (slave) ats. The
State, 20
Carpenter v. Going, 20
V. The State, 23
Carpenter and Wife v. Hall,18
Carr's Executor v. Wyley,.23
Carradine v. O'Connor,. . . .21
Carriere v. Ticknor, 26
Carroll v. Malone, 28
V. The State, 23
Carter v. Corley, 23
ats. Deslonde &
James, 28
V. Doe d. Chaudron,21
ats.Eckles &Brovvn,26
Carter & Howell ats. Fry, . 25
Carter and Wife v. Balfour's
Adm'r, 19
Cartledge ats. Ware, 24
Caruthers ats. Murdock,. . .21
Ala. 01
24C
42
194
67
274
28G
355
249
553
659
438
53
590
401
89
566
327
375
369
44
544
462
650
642
521
461
288
246
223
99
388
109
616
635
80
686
19
587
84
439
821
573
571
521
28
612
541
72
563
479
814
622
785
VIU TABLE OF CASES.
Carver v. Hallett, 26 Ala. 722
Case V. The State, 26 » 17
Case & Pate v. Moore, 21 " 758
Caskey ats. Dixon, 18 " 97
Cassell V. Collins 23 " 676
Castleberry ats. The State,
ex re/. Claunch, 23 " 85
Cater ats. Jesse, 25 " 351 _ ats. ,... 28 " 475
Gaudier ats. Marshall, 21 " 490
Caughman and Wife ats.
HoUis, 22 " 478
Causey ats. Smith, 22 " 568
V. , 28 " 655
Cave V.Webb, 22 " 583
Cawlcy ats. Williams, 18 " 206
Center V. P. &M. Bank,... 22 " 743
Center & Co. ats. Jewell,. . .25 " 498
Central Plank Road Co. ats.
Powell, 24 " 441
V. Saramons
& Dotes, 27 " 380
Centreville Bridge Co. ats.
The State, 18 " 678
Chamberlain V. Gaillard,. . .26 " 504
Chamberlain & Co. v, Mas-terson,
26 " 371
v! , 29 " 299
Chambers V. Perry, 17 " 726
V. The State, 26 " 59
Chapman ats. Bohannon,. . .17 " 697
ats. Dennis & Strick-land,
19 " 29
. V. Hamilton, 19 « 121
. V. Spence 22 " 588
. ats. Walker, 22 " 116
V. Weaver, 19 « 626
Chapman's Adm'r ats. Van-
Wagner & Yeoman, ... 29 " 172
Charles v. Dubose, 29 " 376
Chastang, DoecZ. v.Dill,...19 " 421
Chastang's Heirs ats. Arm-strong,
20 " 609
ats. Baker, 18 " 417
Chaudron ats. Carter, 21 " 72
V. Fitzpatrick, 19 " 649
Cheek v.Waldrum and Wife,25 " 152
Cheesborough ats.Connoley,21 " 166
Chenault'sAd'rs V.Walker,22 " 275
Chighizola V. LeBaron, 21 " 406
Chighizola's Heirs v.Eslava,24 " 237
Childersats.Tankersley,...23 " 781
Christian ats. Thompson's
Adm'r, 28 " 399
City Council of Montgome-ry,
Ex parte,: 24 " 98
ats. Gilmer &Taylor,26 " 665
Clack's Heirs v. Clack's
Adra'rs, 20 " 461
Clark ats. Braley, 22 Ala. 361
V.Gilmer, 28- " 265
ats. Haley, 26 " 439
V. The State, 19 " 552
Clarke V. Pratt, 20 " 470
Clarke & Peck ats. Braley, 18 " 436
Clay ats. Moore, 24 " 235
Clay & Clay ats. Walker,...21 " 797
Clayton ats. "Weir, 19 " 132
Clealand v. Huey, 18 " 343
Cleaveland ats. Bentley,. . .22 " 814
V. McAdams, 21 " 321
Clements.v. Cribbs & Coving-ton,
19 " 241
ats. Dunlap, 18 " 778
Clements' Adm'r ats. Crock-er
and Wife, 23 " 296
ats. Hamilton and
Wife, 17 " 201
Clements & Hunt v. Doe d.
Brown and Wife,.. 24 " 354
Cliatt ats. Crabtree, 22 " 181
Clough ats. Wright, 17 " 490
Clowney ats. Ware, 24 " 707
Cobb ats. Foote and Wife, 18 " 585
V. The State, 19 " 18
Cochran V. Rison, 20 " 463
Cochran & Co. ats. Fire-men's
Insurance Co.,. .27 " 228
Cochran & Estill ats. Cun-ningham's
Executor,. .18 " 479
Cocke ats. Pollard, 19 " 188
Cockrell ats. Hall, 28 " 507
CockrellandWifev.Gurley,26 " 405
Colcloughats. McLure,....17 " 89
Cole, Ex parte, 28 " 50
ats. Massey, 29 " 364
ats. Turner, 24 " 364
Coleman ats. Branch Bank
Mobile, 20 " 140
V. Hair...... 22 " 596
ats. Maury, 24 " 381
V.Robertson's Exec-utors,
17 « 84
V. The State, 20 « .51
Colgin V. Redman, 20 " 650
Collier ats. Forrest, 20 " 175
v.Frierson, 24 " 100
V. Powell & Bradley, 23 " 579
V. Slaughter's Ad'r, 20 " 263
Collier's Adm'r v. Slaugh-ter's
Adm'r, 22 " 671
V. Windham, 27 " 291
Collins ats. Boykin, McRae
& Foster, 20 " 230
ats. Cassell, 23 " 616
ats. Johnson and
Wife, 17 " 318
ats. , 20 " 435
TABLE OF CASES. IX
Collins ats. King, 21 Ala. 363
V. Lavenberg & Co., 19 " 682
-v. Rudolph, 19 " 616
Collins, Brother & Co. ats.
Dickson, 17 " 63.5
Collins & Langwortliy ats.
Owens, 23 " 837
Colomb & Iselin v. Br. Bk.
Mobile, 18 " 454
Colvin V. Owens, 22 " 782
Conibey V. McMichael, 19 " 747
Comm'rs' Court of Butler
ats. Long 18 " 482
v.McCann, ..23 " 599 -.— Dallas ats. Keenan, 26 " 568
Greene ats. Creswell
&Monette, 24 " 282
Marshall ats. Lamar, 21 " 772
Mobile ats. Van
Eppes, 25 " 460
Russell V. Tarver, . . 25 " 480
Talladega v. Thomp-son,
18 " 694
Tallapoosa ats. Tarver,17 " 527
V. ,...21 " 661 — V. ,...29 " 414
Comm'rs of Pilotage v. Steam-boats
Cuba, &c., 28 " 185
Conner V.Banks, 18 " 42
Connoley V. Cheesborough, 21 " 166
Connolly ats. Ala. & Tenn.
Rivers Railroad Co.,... 29 " 373
Constan tine V. Twelves,. . .29 " 607
Cook V. Adams, 27 " 294
^ V.Cook, 28 " 660
-V.Walthall, 20 " 334
V. Wimberly, 24 " 486
Cook & Hardy v.AVebb,...18 " 810
Cook & Mitchell ats. Lewis, 18 " 334
Cook & Scott V. Parham, ... 24 " 21
Cooper ats. Jones, 22 " 551
V. Maclin's Heirs,. .25 " 298
V. Peck & Clark ....22 " 406
V. Turrentine & Free-man,
17 " 13
Copeland v. Flowers, 21 " 472
Corbin V. Sistrunk, 19 " 203
Cordle & McCargo v. Crutch-er,
27 " 171
Cordle and Wife v. Harri-son's
Executors,. .. .22 " 457
Corley V. Carter, 23 •' 612
V. The State, 28 " 22
Cosper ats. Lundie, 20 " 123
Coster V. Brack, 19 " 210
Coster's Executors v. Bank
of Georgia,. ..... .24 " 37
Coster, Robinson & Co. v.
Thomason, 19 " 717
o
Cothran v. Lee, 24 Ala. 380
Cotten V. Thompson, 21 " 574
V. , 25 " 671
Cotton ats. Dawson, 26 " 591
Cottrell ats. Norris,Stodder
& Co., 20 " 304
Couch V. Anderson, 26 " 676
Couthway v. Berghaus,. . . .25 " 393
Covey ats. Jones, 26 " 464
Cowan ats. Land and Wife, 19 " 299
Doe d. ats. Gantt,.- .27 " 582
Cowan and Wife V. Jones,. 27 '• 317
Cowart ats. Bryan & Mc-
Phail, 21 - 92
Cowles ats. Jones, 26 "612
ats. Ware, 24 ' 440
Cowsert and Wife ats.
Mitchell, 20 " 186
Cox V.Davis, 17 '• 714
V. Whitfield, 18 " 738
ats. Wray, 24 •' 337
Cox & Waring ats. Mang-ham,
29 " 81
Coxe's Adm'rs ats. Scott, . . 20 •' 294
Crabb'sAdm'rv. Thomas,. 25 •• 212
Crabtree v. Cliatt, 22 " 181
Crawford v. Barkley, 18 " 270
ats.Crimm's Adm'rs,29 " 623
Crayton V. Johnson, 27 '• 503
Creagh's Adm'r ats. Benje,21 •• 151
Creswell & Monette v.
Comm'rs' Ct. of Greene,24 • 282
Cribbs & Covington ats,
Clements, 19 " 241
Grimm's Adnrsv.Crawford,29 " 623
Crist V. The State, 21 " 137
Crocheron ats. Blann,. . . .19 " 647
ats. , 20 • 320
Crocker and Wife v. Clem-ents'
Adm'r, ; 23 " 296
Croft V. Ferrell, 21 '^ 351
Crommelin ats. Saltmarsh,.24 ' 347
Cromwell, Haight & Co.
ats. Kidd & Co., 17 •• 648
Crompton V. Vasser, 19 " 259
Crook ats. Love, 27 " 624
ats. Wesson, 24 - 378
ats. Wilson and Wife.17 " 59
Croom & May, Ex parte,. . .19 " 561
Crosby V. Brantley, 20 " 287
—V. Hawthorn, 25 " 221
Crossland ats. Hornsby,. . .22 " 625
Crothers v. Lee, ". 29 " 337 — V.Ross' Heirs, 17 " 816
Crow V. Boyd's Adm'rs,. . .17 " 51
V. Crow, 23 " 583
-ats. Hudson, 26 " 515
V. 21 " 560
V. Patton 26" 426
TABLE OF CASES.
Crow V. The State 18 Ala. 541
Crow's Adm'r ats. M.irshaH,29 " 278
Crowell ats. Erwin, Myers
& Co., 17 " 227
(Jrownover V. Srygley, . . . .19 " 2.51
Cruise V. Riddle,." 21 " 791
Cruni ats. Williams, 27 " 468
V. , 29 " 446
Crump V. Wallace, 27 " 277
Crutcher ats. McCargo,. . . .23 " 575
ats. McCargo & Cor-dle,
27 " 171
Crutchfield ats. Houston,. .22 " 76
V. Hudson, 23 " 393
Culbreath ats. Johnson, 19 " 348
Cullom& Co. ats. Mastin,..28 " 670
Cullumv. Br. Bk. Mobile,. 23 '^ 797
ats. Hutchison, 23 " 622
Cummings & Co. ats. Pool,.20 " 563
Cunningham ats. Dew,.... 28 " 466
V.Fontaine, 25 " 644
• ats. Slaughter, 24 " 260
Cunningham's Executor v.
Cochran & Estill, 18 " 479
Cunningham & Rippetoe ats.
Stewart, 22 " 626
Curry's Adm'rs ats. Broome,19 " 805
Curry & Groce v. Shrader
and Wife, 19 " 831
Cuthbert ats. Huggins,. . . .21 " 349
V. Wolfe, 19 " 373
ID.
Dabbs V. Dabbs, 27 " 646
Dale V. The State, 27 " 31
Danforth V. Laney, 28 " 274
Daniel v. Modawell, 22 " 365
Daniels ats. Benford, 20 " 445
Darby ats. Prater's Adm'r,. 24 " 496
Dargan ats. Love, 21 " 583
Darling V. Bryant &;Walker,l
7
" 10
Darrington ats. Pearson, ..18 " 348
ats. , 21 " 169
Darrington's Heirs ats. Des-londe
& James,....-. ..29 " 92
Darrington & Savage v.
Walshe& Emanuel,.. 24 " 293
v. ,.26 •' 619
Dave (slave) V. The State,.. 22 " 23
Davenport <fc Patterson ats.
Ptobertson, 27 " 574
David V. David, 27 " 222
ats. Zeigler & Hall, . 23 " 127
Davidson ats. JMoore &
Jones, 18 " 209
Davis V. Adams, 18 •' 264
ats. Beavers, 19 " 82
V.Calhoun, 24 " 437
Davis V. Calhoun, 24 Ala. 455
ats. Cox, 17 '• 714
V.Dickey, 23 " 848
ats. Felder, 17 •' 418
ats. Flinn, 18 " 132
ats. Goss 21 " 479
ats. Governor, 20 " 356
ats. Lang 18 " 801
V. Lassiter, 20 " 561
ats. Leaird, 17 •' 27
^ats. , 17 " 448
^ ats. Love & Co., 25 " 335
ats. McKissack, 18 " 315
ats.Poe, 29 " 676
ats. Sherrod, :17 " 312
ats. Snedicor, 17 " 472
V. The State, 17 " 3.54
V. ,...-. .17 " 415
V.Young, 20 " 151
Davis & Ferguson v. Tiie
State, 19 " 13
Dawson V. Cotton, 26 " 591
ats. Jones, 19 " 672
Dawson & Riley ats. Salton-staU
and Wife, 28 " 164
Day ats. Rowland, 17 " 681
Day & Co. ats. Flake &
Freeman, 22 " 132
Dearing ats. Hutchinson,. .20 " 798
V.Moore, 26 " 586
DeBeniie V. The State,.... 19 " 23
V. McCollum, 20 " 280
DeGraffenreid ats. Thomas,17 " 602
ats. ,.27 " 651
DeJarnette ats. Tyns 26 " 280
Deloach v. State Bank, .... 27 " 437
Dennis & Strickland v.
Chapman, 19 " 29
Denson ats. a\Iitchell and
Wife,. 29 " 327
V. ,...26 " 3G0
Denson and Wife v. Autrey's
Executor, 21 " 205
Dent V. Portwood, 17 " 242
V. , 21 " 588
Derrett V. Alexander, 25 " 265
Desha & Sheppard v. Smith,20 '' 747
Deslonde&; James V.Carter ,28 " 541 —— V. Darring-ton's
Heirs, 29 " 92
Desplous ats. Russell, 25 " 514
ats. —, 29 " 308
Devany's Heirs v. Devanj^'s
Adm'r, 25 " 722
Devendal v. Malone's Exec-utors,
25 " 272
De Vendell v. Doe d. Ham-ilton,
27 " 156
Dew V. Cunningham, 28 " 466
TABLE OF CASES. 21
Dial V. Hair 18 Ala,
Dickens v. Bush 23 "
Dicke}' ats. Davis, 23 "
Dickinson & Winn v. Any, 25 "
Dickson v. Bacheklev, 21 "
V. Collins, Brother
&Co.. 17 "
Dill ats. Camp, 27 "
V. , 22 "
ats. Doe d. Chastang-, 19 "
V. Shahan, \'. .25 "
V. The State 25 "
Dillahunty ats. Rice, 20
Dixon V. Barclay, 22
V. Caskey, 18
Doe d. Brown and Wife v.
Clements & Hmir,..24
Burgen & Pearsall
ats. Parker, 20
Carlisle ats. Harvey,23
Cliastang v. Dill,.."..19
Chaudron ats. Carter, 21
Cowan ats. Gantt,. .27
Eddins ats. Elliott, 24
Eslava ats. Chighi-zola's
Heirs, 24
Gordon ats. Gai!;er. 29
Hallett & Walker
ats. Magee, .22
Hamilton ats.DeVen-dell,
27
Hughes V. Wilkin-son,
21
Kennedy v. Holman
& Howard, 19
ats. Rawls, 23
V. Reynolds, 27
Malempre ats.Ethe-ridge,
18
Pryor ats. McCall,. . 17
Rochon's Heirs ats.
Kennedy's Executor,26 '
Root ats.-Hall, 19 '
Saltonstall and Wife
V. Riley & Dawson, 28 '
St. Cyre ats.-Tannis. 21 '
Stevens v. King. ... .21 '
Stewart & Easton v.
Seabury, 22 '
Tillman v. Long &
Freeman, 29 '
Donally ats. Woodward,. . . 27 '
Donley v. Camp, 22 '
Donnell v. Jones, 17 '
Dorman ats. Swinney & Pal-mer,
25 ''
Dorman's Executrix v. Rich-ardson,
28 '•
Dorrah ats. Poe, 20 '
' 849
' 848
' 424
' 699
' 635
' 553
' 249
' 421
' 694
' 15
399
370
597
354
251
635
421
72
582
508
237
341
699
156
296
734
240
364
565
533
384
378
164
449
429
207
376
198
659
689
433
679
288
Dorrance v. Jones, 27 A
Doss ats. Campbell, 17 '
V. , 19 "
Douglass & Easton v. Br.
Bk. Mobile, 19 "
Douthitt and^Wife ats. Mat-thews,
27 "
Dowdle ats. Summerlin,. . .24 "
Downs ats. Gill, 26 "
Drake v. Foster, 28 "
V. Goree, 22 "
V. Moore, 18 "
Drane v. Gunter, 19 "
V. King & Devitt,. .21 "
ats.Smelser, 19 "
Drew ats. Nesbitt, 17 "
V. Ricks, 17 "
Drinkard v. The State, 20 "
Driver ats. Lanier, 24 "
Drumraond ats Robinson, . . 24 "
Dubose ats. Charles, 29 "
ats. Iverson & Rob-inson,
27 "
ats. Kirksey, 19 "
Dubose & Co. ats. Lewis,. .29 "
Dudlej' V. Horn and Wife, 21 "
Duke's Adm'r v. Duke's
Distributees, 26 "
Dumas v. Hunter, 25 "
V. , 28 "
V. Smith, 1'
Duncan v. Hargrove, 18
22
Duncan & Hooper v. Stewart, 25
Dunham v. Roberts, 27
V, , 28
Dunklin v. Gafford, 17
Dunlap V. Clements, 18
V. Robinson, 28
Duim ats. Preston, 25
ats. Smith, 27
Dupree v. Perry, 18
Dupree's Adm'r ats. Tur-ner's
Adm'r, 19
Duramus v. Harrison & Whit-man,
.... 26
Dutton's Adm'r ats. John-ston
& Co., 27
Dyer and Wife ats. Jones, 20
Fames ats. Merriwether,. .17
Earle ats. Barney', 20
v.Reid, 25
Easley ats. Givens, 17
ats. McNeill & For-niss,
24
ats. Afoore, 18
la. 630
' 401
590
659
273
428
670
649
409
597
731
556
245
379
25
9
149
174
367
418
43
219
379
673
711
688
305
150
40S
701
286
814
778
100
507
315
34
19S
326
245
330
405
463
3S5
455
619
xu TABLE OF CASES.
Eastland ats. Hatter 22 Ala. 688
V. Sparks, 22 " 607
Eastman v. Ilobbs 26 " 741
Easton V. Lowery, 29 " 454
Echols ats. Ada)', 18 " 353
ats. Owens, 28 " 689
EGkles& Brown V. Bates,. 26 " 655
V.Carter, 26 " 563
Eddins ats. Elliott, 24 " 508
Edgar V. McArn, 22 « 796
Edmondson v. Welsh and
• Wife, 27 " 578
Edmnndson v. The State,. .17 " 179
Edwards V. Boykin, 21 " 261
ats. Hooper, 18 " 280
ats. , 20 " 528
ats. , 25 " 528
V.Lewis, 18 " 494
Edwards & Walke ats.
State Bank, 20 " 512
Edy V. McCoy, 20 " 403
Eiland ats. Hopper, 21 " 714
Elam V. The State, 25 " 53
V. , 26 " 48
Elliott V. Br. Bk. Mobile,. .20 " 345
V. Doe d. Eddins,.. 24 " 508
V. McClelland, ....17 " 206
V. The State, 26 " 78
Elliott & Stanley V. ,26 " 26
Ellis V. White, 25 " 540
Elmore v. Mustin, 28 " 309
'EUt.on, Ex parte, 25 " 72
Ellsworth ats. Harrell &
Croft, 17 " 576
V. Tartt, 26 " 733
Emannel v. Bird, 19 " 596
V. Ketchniu, 21 " 257
Emanuel & Walshe ats. Sav-age
& Darrington, 24 " 293
ats. ,26 " 619
Empire (Steamboat) v. Ala.
Coal Mining Co., 29 " 698
Enis V.Ross, ...19 " 239
Erwin ats. Erwin & Wil-liams,
25 " 236
V. Haranor. 27 " 296
Erwin, Myers & Co. v. Crow-ell,
l'^ " 227
Eskridge V. The State, 25 " 30
Eslava ats. Chighizola, 24 " 237
ats. Gannard, 20 " 732
V. Lepretre, 21 " 504
ats. Rood, 17 " 430
ats. Smoot & Ketch-nm,
23 " 659
Eslava's Heirs v. Boiling &
Boiling, 22 " 721
Etheridge v. Malempre,. . .18 " 565
Eubanksv.Tlie State,.... 17 " 181
Evans v. Battle, 19 Ala. 398
V.Bell, 20
V. Carey, 29
V. Governor, 18
V. Lamar, 21
Ewers v. Smith, 21
Ewing V. Blount, 20
v.Peck 26
V. Peck & Clark,. . .17
. V. Sanford, 19
V. , 21
. V. Standefer, 18
Ex ?;« r^e And r ews an d Wife ,1 9 '
Banks, 28 '
, 28 '
Bush, 29 '
Campbell, 20 '
— City Council of Mont-gomery,
24 '
-Cole, 28
— Croom & May, 19
-Elston, 25
— Garlington, 26
-Gist, 26
— Grantland, 29
— Greene & Graham,. 29
— Henry, 24
— Johnson, 18
— Keenan, 21
— King, 27
— Lowe, 20
-McCrary, ..22_ — Ferryman and Wife,25
— Pickett, : ...24
— Putnam, 20
— Remson, 23
— Robbins, 29
— Rowland, 26 — Russell, 29 — Small, 25
Smith, 23
-^ Stiff, 18
Swan, 23
Yincent, 26
Walker 25
Whitehead, 23
Ezzell ats. Pickle's Adni'r,.27
Fail fc Patterson ats. Ben-nett,
26
Fair ats. Knox, 17
Falk & Rosenthal v. Reese,19
Falkner v. Comra'rs' Court
Randolph Co., 19
Farley ats. Greene, 20
Farmer's Distributees v.
Farmer's Adm'r, 26
509
99
659
333
38
694
413
339
605
157
400
582
28
89
50
89
98
50
561
72
170
156
69
52
638
414
558
387
330
65
79
91
592
25
71
133
719
74
94
' 464
' 192
« 145
' 81
93
' 623
605
503
240
177
322
671
TABLE OF CASES. Xlli
Farmer (Owners of Steam-boat.)
V. McCraw, 26 Ala. 189
Faver & Mount V. Briggs,. 18 " 478
Favers V. Cxlass, 22 " 621
Fay V. Hall 25 " 704
Felder V. Davis, 17 " 418
Felix (slave) v. The State,. 18 " 720
Fanner v.Kirkman, 26 " 650
ats. Turner, 19 '• 355
ats. Walker, 20 " 192
ats. , 28 " 367
Ferguson ats. Becton, 22 '' 599
ats. Townes &
Nooe, 20 " 147
Ferguson & Scott v. Baber's
Adra'rs, 24 " 402
Ferrell ats. Croft, 21 " 351
Fettyplace, Goodman & Co.
ats. Sch'r Louisiana.. .21 " 286
Field V. Ireland 21 " 240
V. Walker, 17 " 80
Field's Heirs v. Goldsby.. .28 " 218
Fields V. Walker, 23 " 155
Fike ats. Kirksey, 27 " 383 __ ats. , 29 " 206
Finch ats. Stallings, 25 " 518
Fiquett ats. Moore, 19 " 236
Firemen's Insurance Co. v.
Cochran & Co.,27 " 228
V. McMillan ,29 " 147
ats. Perrine,22 " 575
Fisher and Wife ats. Alex-ander,
...18 " 374
Fitzpatrick ats.Ciiaudron,.19 " 649
ats. Williams,. 20 " 791
Flake V. The State, 19 " 551
Flake & Freeman v. Day &
Co., 22 " 132
Flanagan v. The State, 19 " 546
Flash, Hartwell & Co. v.
Paul, Cook & Co., ,...29 " 141
Fletcher ats. llamer, 29 " 470
Flinn v. Davis, 18 " 132
Flinn& Martin V. The State,28 " 71
V. ,59
" 30
Florey ats. Florey's Ex'rs, .24 " 241
Flournoy V. Mims, 17 " 36
Flournoy's Heirs ats. Miller
and Wife, 26 " 724
Flowers ats. Copeland, 21 " 472
Floyd V. Fountain, ..17 " 700
V.Morrow, 26 " 353
Fluker v. Henry's Adm'r,. .27 " 403
Flynn ats. McElhaney, 23 *' 819
Fogg &, Vanderslice v. John-ston,
,27 " 432
Fontaine ats. Cunningliam,25 " 644
Fontaine & Dent v. Beerg
& Smith, '. 19 « 722
Foote and Wife v. Cobb,. .18 Ala. 585
Forbes ats. Walker, 25 " 139
Foreman ats. West, 21 " 400
Forniss & McNeill v. Eas-ley,
24 " 455
Forrest v. Collier, 20 " 175
ats.Kiiigsland&; Co.18 " ^519
Forsyth ats. Partridge,. . .29 " 200
Forward v. Marsh, 18 " 645
Foster V. Blount, 18 " 687
ats. Drake, 28 " 649
• V. Glazener, 27 " 391
V. Gressett's Heirs, 29 " 393
V. Rodgers, 27 " 602
V. Skipper, 29 " 330
V. State Bank, 17 " 672
V. Sykes, 23 " 796
Fountain ats. Floyd, 17 " 700
Fonst V. Yielding, 28 " 658
Fowler V. Banks, 21 '•' 079
Fowler & Prout v. Armour,24 " 194
Fralick V.Presley and AVife,29 " 457
Francis V. Gannard, 18 " 794
Francois v. The State, 20 " 83
Fraidc (slave) v. The State, 27 " 37
—Franklin V. The State, 28 " 9 V. .—,....29 " 14
Frazier & Kelly ats. May,. .27 " 497
Frederick V. Youngblood,. 19 " 680
Freele ats. Winn, 19 " 171
Freeman v. Scnrlock, 27 " 407
V. Swan, „ 22 " 106
Freeman &. Long ats. Doe d.
Tillman, 29 " 376
Freeman k, Warren v. Jor-dan,
17 " 500
Friend V. Oliver, 27 " 532
Frierson ats. Collier, 24 " 100
r V. Frierson, 21 " 549
Frowner v. Johnson, 20 " 477
Frowner & Hunt ats. Acre
& Johnson, 28 " 580
Frowner & Wife ats. Bobe,18 " 89
Fry ats. Br. Bk. Mobile, ... 23 « 770
V. Carter & Howell,. . 25 « 479
Fuller ats. Young, 29 " 464
Fulton Insurance Co. v. Mil-ner,
Tinsley & Co., .... 23 '-' 420
Furlow's Adm'r v. Merrell,23 " 705
Furniss ats. Sheppard,. . . .19 " 760
-ats. Wray's Adni'rs,27 " 471
Gaffney v. Williamson's
Adm'r, 21 " 112
GafFord ats. Dunklin, 17 " 814
Gager v. Doe f/. Gordon,. .29 •' 341
Gaillard ats. Chamberlain,. 26 " 504
XIV TABLE OF CASES.
Gaines v, Harvin 19 Ala. 491
Gallagher v. Witheriiigton.29 " 579
Gailev. Lvncli, 21 " 420
Gaiiawayv. The State,.... 22 » 722
Ganawaj' & Kimball v. May-or
of Mobile, 21 " 577
Gann ats. Allman, 29 " 240
Gannardv. Eslava, 20 " 732
ats. Francis. 18 " 794
Gantt V. Doe (/. Cowan, 27 " 582
ats. Gardner, 19 " 66(5
Gantfs Adnvr V. Phillips,. 23 " 275
Gardner ats. Gantt, 19 " 666
ats. ]\[alinda (slave),24 " 719
V.Randolph, 18 " 685
Garlington, Ex parte, 26 " 170
Garner &Nevillv.Johnson,22 " 494
Garnett v. Yoe 17 " 74
Garrett V. Adams, 22 " 602
V. Garrett, 27 " 687
v.- 29 " 439
V. Holloway & Ma-lone,
24 " 376
V. Lvle, 27 " 586
Garrett k Hill v. Logan, ... 1
9
••' 344
Gaston ats. Patterson,. . ..17 '• 223
ats. AYatkins, 17 " 664
Gates ats. ^litchell, 23 " 438
ats. Parish, 29 '•' 254
ats. Thompson, 18 " 32
Gaunt and Wife v. Tucker's
Executors, 18 " 27
Gayle v. Bancroft's Adm'r., 17 " 351 — V. , 22 " 316
ats. Boxley, 19 " 151
ats. Lodor 29 " 412
ats. Petty 25 ." 472
Gayle & Bower ats. Watts, 20 " 817
Gayle & Riggs v. Bancroft's
Adm'r, 22 " 648
Gayle & Minter v. Br. Bk.
Mobile, 23 " 762
Gee ats. Governor, 19 " 199
George v.Goldsby, 23 " 326
Gerald v. Miller's Distribu-tees,
21 " 433
Gerald and Wife v.Bunkley, 17 " 170
V. McKenzie, 27 *' 166
Geron ats. Mills, 22 " 669
Gewin ats. McGehee, 25 " 176
Gover v. Br. Bk. Mobile,. .21 - 414
Gibson V. Hatchett & Bro., 24 " 201
V. Land 27 " 117
V. Marquis and Wife, 29 " 668
V. Wilson 18 " 63
Gilbert V. Gilbert, 22 '• 529
ats. Myers, 18 " 467
Gilbert & Bro. ais. Waring
& Co., 25 •• 295
Gilbert & Maddox ats. Haw-kins
19 Ala. 54
Gilbrcath V. Manning, 24 " 418
Gildersleeve V. Caraway,. . .19 " 246
Gill V. Downs, 26 " 670
Gillespie ats. Price & Simp-son,
28 " 279
Gillespie's Ad'r v.Burleson,28 " 551
Gillis V. Holley, 19 " 663
Gilmer ats. Clark, 28 " 265
V. AVare 19 " 242
Gilmer & Taylor v. City
Council of Montgomery, 28 " 665
Gindrat v. JdcGebee, 20 " 95
Gingles V.Caldwell, 21 " 444
Gisi, Ex parte, 26 " 156
Givens V. Easley, 17 " 385
Givens'Adm'rats.Herndon,19 " 313
Givhan ats. Montgomery,. .24 " 568
Glass ats. Favers, 22 " 621
V. Glass, 24 " 468
Glasscock V. Smith, 25 " 474
Glassell ats. Waddell, 18 " 561
Glazener ats. Foster, 27 " 391
Glenn ats Powell 21 " 458
Gliddon V. McKinstry, 25 " 245
V. , 28 " 408
Glover V. Glover, 18 " 367
-Godboldv. Blair&Co.,....27 " 592 ats. Oswald, 20 " 811
V.Roberts, 20 " 354
Godden V. LeGrand, 28 " 158
Godley ats. Sanders, 23 " 473
Godwin V. McGehee, 19 " 468
ats. McLaughlin,. . .23 " 846
• V. Yonge, 22 " 553
Going ats. Carpenter, 20 " 587
Goldingv.Golding's Adm'r, 24 " 122
Goldsby ats. Albertson,
Douglass & Co...... 28 " 711
ats. Field's Heirs,...28 " 218
ats. George, 23 " 326
Goldsmith, Forcheimer &
Co. V.Lang, 25 " 486
V. Picard,...27 " 142
Goldstickerv. Stetson & Co.,21 " 404
Goldthwaite's Heirs v. Tar-leton,
23 " 346
Goode&Ulrickats.Stewart,29 " 476
Goodman & Mitchell v. Wal-ker,
21 " 647
V. , 29 " 444
Gordon ats. Gager, 29 " 341
v.McLeod, 20 " 242
Goree ats. Drake, 22 " 409
Goss V.Davis, 21 " 479
Gould V.Hayes 19 " 438
V. , 25 " 426
v.Hill, 18 " 84
TABLE OF CASES. XV
Gould V. Hill, 18 Ala. 457
Governor ats. Brooks, 17 " 806^'
V. Campbell, .17 " 566
V.Davis, 20 " 366
ats. Evaiis, 18 " 659
V. Frierson, 24 " 100
V. Gee, 19 " 199
^ats. Hntchissoii,.. .23 " 809
V. McGrew & Beck, 19 " 89
ats. Payne, 18 " 320
V. Perrine, 23 " 807
V. Powell & Bradley. 23 " 579
ats. Raiford, ..29 " 382
ats. White, 18 " 767
Gowen & Co. v. Jones, 20 " 128
Grady V. Robinson, 28 " 289
Grady's Ad'r V. Hammond, 21 " 427
Graham ats. Joues, 21 " 654
ats, , 24 " 450
ats. Love, 25 " 187
V. NeSmith, 18 " 763
ats. Perry, 18 " 822
Graham & Rogers v. JSTew-man,
21 " 497
Grannis &; Co. ats. Rogers, 20 " 247
Grant v. Kennedy,. .
.'. 19 " 226
V. ^iloseley, 29 " 302
Grant & Nickels ats. Stod-der,
28 " 416
Grantland, Ex parte, 29 " 69
Graves ats. Slielley, 29 " 385
ats. Williams, 17 " 62
Gray V. Jenkins, 24 " 516
ats. Jordan, 19 " 618
ats. Wright, 20 « 363
Gray's Executors v. Brown, 22 " 262
Green ats. Hunter, 22 '^ 329
v. Maclin, 29 " 695
ats. Raney, 18 " 771
Greene ats. Allen, 19 " 34
V. Farley, 20 " 322
ats. Walker 22 " 679
Greene & Graham, jExpari'e, 29 " 52
Greeiiway, Henry & Smith
ats. Bradford and Wife,r7 " 797
Greenwood ats. Seay, 21 " 491
Gregory ats. Strong, 19 " 146
Gregory and Yv^ife ats. Ba-ker,
.- 28 " .544
Gresham ats. Reese, 29 '•' 91
V.Tucker 28 " 611
Gressett's Heirs ats. Foster,29 " 393
Gre3''s Heirs v. Grey's
Adm'rs, 22 " 233
Grier v. Campbell, 21 " 327
Griffin V. Isbell, 17 " 184
^ ats. Lindsay, 22 ' 629
V. Osbourne & Co.,. 20 " 594
V. Reynolds, 17 " 198
Griffin v. State Bank, 17 Ala. 258
V.Wilson, 19 • 27
Griggsby ats. Hair, 18 " 45 — V. , 25 "
.327
Gunn V. Barrow, 17 " 743
V.Brantley, 21 '• 633
ats. , 29 " .387
V. Howell 27 " 66.3
Gunnels V. State Bank, ... .18 " 67G
Gunter ats. Di'anc, 19 " 731
ats. Williams and
W^ife, 28 " 681
Gurley ats. Cockrell and
Wife, 26 " 405
Gwjmn and Wife ats. Ham-ilton's
Adm'r, 24 " 515
V. ,.29 " 233
Hadden'sEx'rs V.Powell... 17 " 314
ats. ,21
" 745
Haden v. Brown 18 " 641
V. —, 22 " 572
Hagadon ats. Campbell,. . .24 " 375
Hair ats. Arrington, 19 " 243
V. Aver}', 28 " 267 ——ats. Coleman, 22 " 596
ats. Dial, 18 " 798
ats. Griggsby, 18 '• 45
ats. , 25 " 327
ats. Little, ,28 " 23S
Hair & Labuzan V. Lowe, .19 " 224
Hale V. Henderson, 19 '' 155
ats. Stone, 17 " 557
V. The State, 24 " 80
Haley v. Clark, 26 " 439
Hall V. Canute and Wife,. .22 " 650
ats. Carpenter and
W^ife 18 " 439
V. Cockrell...: 28 " 507
V. Doe J. Root, 19 " 378
ats. Fay, 25 " 704
V. Holcombe, 26 " 720
V. Hudson, 20 " 284
V. Huggins, 19 " 200
V. Magee & Reid, .... 27 " 414
ats. Mdlard's Adm'rs.. 24 " 209
ats. Smith & Loveless,20 " 777
Hall's Distributees v. An-drews,
17 " 40
Hall's Heirs ats. Wallace.. 19 '• 367
Hall and Wife v. , . 25 " 438
Hall & Zeigler v. David,. . .23 " 127
ETallett ats. Carver . .26 " 722
Hallett & Walker ats. Ma-gee,
22 " 699
Halstead V. Shepard, 23 '• 558
Ham V. The State,. ...... .17 " 1S8
XVI TABLE OF CASES.
Hamilton ats. Chapman,. . .19 Ala.
ats. DeVendell,. .27 "
V. Gwynn and
Wife 24 "
V. Williams, 26 "
Hamilton and Wife v. Clem-ents'
Adm'r, IT
Hamilton's Adm'r ats.
Gwyiin and Wife,. . . .29
Hamlet v. Johnson, 26
Hammond ats. Grady's xld'r,21
ats. Henderson,. .19
Hamner ats. Erwin, 27
V. Mason, 24
ats. Niolin, 22
ats. Patton, 28 — V.Smith, 22
Hampton ats. Bishop, 19
ats.Sherrod's Ex'rs,25
Hanberry V. Hanberry,.. . .29
Hanna v. Price, 23
ats. Riddle, 25
Hannah ats. Ross, 18
Hanson v. Jacks and Wife,22
V. Patterson, 17
Harbin ats. Jeffries 20
Ilarbinson v. Harrell, 19
Hardesty ats. Martin, 27
Hardesty & Marriott v.
Lewis, 25
Hardin v. Hardin, 17
Hardy v. Boaz, 29
V. Hardy's Heirs,. .26
V. Toney, 20
Hargrove ats. Duncan,. . . .18
ats. , ....... .22
ats. Stewart & Fon-taine,
23
Harknessv. Sears & Walker, 2 6
Harlan v. Thompson, 20
Harper ats. Allen, 26
ats. Bradford, 25
Harrall V. The State, 26
Harrell ats. Harbinson,. . . .19
V.Whitman, 19
-v. ; 20
Harrell & Croft v. Ellsworth, 17
Harrington v.Merriweathcr,20
Harris ats. Ala. & Tenn.
Rivers Railroad Co., 25
V.Bell, .27
V. Billingsley,. .... .18 —• ats. , 17
ats. Brcnnan's Adm'r, 20
. ^ V. Hillman, 26
V. Intendant of Liv-ingston,
28
ats. Lightsey 20
• V. Nesbit, 24
121
156
515
527
201
233
557
427
340
296
480
578
618
433
792
652
719
826
484
125
549
738
387
753
458
332
250
168
524
237
77
150
429
493
94
686
337
52
753
135
519
576
607
232
520
438
214
185
380
577
409
398
Harris ats. Reese, 27 Ala.
? V.Rowland's Adm'rs, 23 "
Harrison v. Harrison, 19 "
V. Harrison & Saun-ders,
20 "
ats. Pool, 18 •'
V. The State, 24 "
ats Williams and
Wife, 19 "
Harrison'^s Ex'rs v. Cordle
and Wife, 22
Harrison & Robinson ats.
Brown, 17
Johnston, 27
Harrison & Saunders ats.
Harrison 20 '
Harrison & Whitman ats.
Duraraus, 26 '
Hart ats. Whitworth and.
Wife,; 22 '
ats. Williams, 17
Harvey, V. Carlisle, 23
Htirvey and Wife v. Thorpe, 28
Harvin ats. Gaines, 19
Harwell v. Steel, 17
ats.Townsend&Bro.,18
Hacuhett & Bro. ats. Gibson, 24
Hatter V. Eastland, 22
Hatton V. Landman, 28 — V. Weir, 19
Hatton's Adm'rs v. Jordan, 29
Hawkins ats. Blount, 19
• V. Gilbert & Mad-dox,
19
Hawthorn ats. Crosby, 25
Hayes ats. Gould, 19
ats. , 25
ats. Sellers & Cook,. 17
Haynie v. Waring & Co.,. .29
Hearin ats. Matheson's Heirs,29
Heira ats. Roberts, 27
Helmes' Ex'rs ats. Hudson .23
Henderson v. Hale, 19
V. Hammond, 19
ats. Moore & Jones,18
V. Plumb & Robbins,18
• V. Segars 28
V. Sublett, 21
ats. Thomas, 27
Henderson & Slocum ats.
Frankenheimer, 24
Hendree ats. Hiscox, 27
Hendrix ats. West and Wife,28
Henry v. Black's Adm'r,. . .24
Ex parte, 24
V. Jones,. 28
ats. Powell's Adm'r,27
V. Porter, 29
Henry's Adm'r ats. Fluker;27
301
644
499
629
514
67
277
457
774
445
629
326
343
102
635
250
491
372
301
201
688
127
127
26G
100
54
221
438
426
749
263
210
678
585
154
340
232
74
352
626
523
373
216
226
417
638
385
612
619
403
TABLE OF CASES. xvu
Henry unci Wife v. Hick-man,
22Ala.G85
Hernclon v. Givens' Adm'r,19 " 313
Hewlett ats. Pipkin, 17 " 291
Heydenfeldt V.Towns,.... 27 " 423
Heyer ats. Lamkin, 19 " 228
Hickman ats. Henry and
Wife, 22 " G85
Higgins ats. Martin, 23 " 775
^^— ats. Morrow, 29 " 448
Higginbottom ats. Brown,. 19 " 207
Hildreth & Moseley ats.
Brooks, 22 " 469
Hill V. Averett, 27 " 484
ats. Gould, 18 " 84
ats. , 18 " 457
^ ats. King & Co., 20 " 133
• ats. Lanier, 25 " 554
Hill and Wife v. McRae,. .27 " 175
Hillman ats. Harris, 26 " 380
Hines and Wife v.Trantham,27 " 359
Hinkle ats. McCreliss' Dis-tributees,
17 " 459
Hinson V. Preslor, 27 " 643
V. Wall, 20 " 298
Hirschfelder V. The State,19' " 534
V. ,18
«
J.12
Hiscos V. Hendree, 27 " 216
Hitt & Wade V. Rush, 22 " 563
Hobbs ats. Eastman, 26 " 741
Hobson's Adm'r ats. An-drews,
23 " 219
Hodges V. Br. Bk. Decatm-,r7 " 42
Hodnett & Hays ats. Pool, . 18 " 752
Hoffman V. Hoffman, 26 " 535
Hogan V. Reynolds, 21 " 56
Hogan's Ex'r v. Calvert,. . .21 " 194
Hoke &, Abernathy ats.
Lindsay, ..21 " 542
Holcombe ats. Hall, 26 " 720
ats. Ramey, 21 " 567
Holland v. Adams, 21 " 680
Holleyv. Acre, 23 " 603
ats. Armstrong, 29 " 305
ats. Burton, 29 " 318
-ats. Gillis, 19 " 663
ats. Tucker, 20 " 426
• V. Younge, 27 " 203
Hollingsworth ats. Bouey,.23 " 690
; V. Martin,.. .23 " 591
Hollis V. Caughman and
Wife, 22 " 478
Holloway & Mai one ats.
Garrett, .
.
'. 24 " 376
Holly ats. Burton, 18 " 408
Holman V. Whiting, 19 " 703
Holman & Howard ats.
Kennedy, 19 " 734
Holmes V. The State, 23 " 17
3
Holmes' Heirs ats. Yaughan
& Hatcher, 22 Ala. 593
Holston V. Holston, 23 " 777
Holt V. Robinson, 21 " lOG
V. School Commission-ers
of Mobile, 29 " 4.51
Homer v. Purser, 20 " 573
Hooks V. Branch Bank
Montgomery, 18 " 451
V.Smith, 18 " 338
ats. , 19 " 101
Hoole & PauUinv. Attorney-
General 22 " 190
Hooper V. Askew, 28 " 634
^ V.Edwards, 18 " 280
V. -, 20 " 528
V. , 25 " 528
Hooper's Ex'r ats. Smith &
Wife, 20 " 245
^v. ,...23 " 639
Hooper & Duncan V. Stewart.25 " 408
Hopkins v. Scott, 20 " 179
Hopper V. Eiland, 21 " 714
V. McWhorter, 18 " .229
V.Steele, 18 " 828
Horn ats. Averett, 19 " 8^3
Horn and Wife ats. Dudley,21 " 379
Hornsby v. Crossland,. . . .22 " 625
Horton V. Averett, 20 " 719
v.Moseley, 17 " 794
v. Sledge, 29 " 478
Hoskins ats. Jones' Ex'rs,. 18 " 489
Houseman V. Stewart, ... .28 " 684
Houston V. Branch IBank
Huntsville,.: 25 " 250
V. Crutchfield's
Adm'r, 22 " 76
ats. Lee, 20 " 301
Howard V. Bugbee, 25 " 548
V.Howard, 26 " 682
V. Ingersoll, 17 " 780
V. , 23 " 673
ats. Sanford., 29 " 684
Howell ats. Gunn, 27 " 663
ats. Williamson,. . .17 " 830
Howell & Carter ats. Fry,. 25 " 479
Howze ats. Lockett, 18 " 613
Hoyt, Ford & Robinson v.
Murphy, 18 " 316
V. ,.23 " 456
Hubbard and W^ife ats.
Jordan's Adm'r, 26 " 433
Huberv. Zimmerman, 21 " 488
V. , 29 " 379
Huckabee V. Swoope, 2^0 " 491
Hudson V. CroW', 21 " 560
V. , 26 " 515
ats. Crutchfield,...23 " 393
ats. Hall, 20 " 284
XVlll TABLE OF CASES.
Hudson V. Helmes' Ex'rs,. .23 Ala. 585
V. Hudson, 20 " 364
'-— ats. Yarborough,. . .19 " 653
V. Young, 25 " 376
Hudson & Stokes v. Weir
j5^; -Pa^tg 29 " 294
Huev ats. clealan d.
'.'.'.'.'.'.'.18 " 343
Huffman V. The State,.... 28 " 48
-V. , 29 " 40
HufFstutler ats. Armstrong,19
" 51
Huggius V. Ball, 19 " 587
ats. Cutlibert,...21 " 349
ats.Hall, 19 " 200
V. Powell, 19 " 129
Hughes ats. Carey, 17 " 338
. V.Hughes, 19 " 307
V. Mitchell 19 " 268
V.Young, 25 " 483
Huguenin ats. Letondal,. .26 " 552
Hullum V. State Bank,. . . .18 " 805
Humphrey v.Whitten,. .. .17 " 30
Hunt ats. Thompson and
Wife, 22 " 517
Hunt & Frowner v. Acre &
Johnson 28 " 580
Hunt & Hunt v.Barfield,.. 19 " 117
Hunter ats. Dumas, 25 " 711
V. , 28 " 688
V. Green, 22 " 329
Hurt V. The State, 19 " 19
Hurter V. Robbins, 21 " 585
Hussey v. Roquemore,. . . .27 " 281
Hutchinson v. Bearing, .... 20 " 798
Hutchison V. Cullum, 23 " 622
Hutchisson v. Governor,.. 23 " 809
ats. Rowan,.... 27 " 328
Hutto ats. Watson, 27 " 513
I.
Ijams ats. McVay's Adm'r,.27 " 238
Ijams ifc Carr v. Rice,. .. ...17 " 404
Ikelheimer ats. Ozley, 26 " 332
IngersoU ats. Howard,. . . .17 *• 780
ats. , 23 " 673
Ingram V. The State, 27 " 17
Insurance Co. v. Cochran
&Co., 27 " 228
V. McMillan 29 " 147
V. McMillan & Son, 27 « 77
ats. ]\rooring, 27 " 254
ats. Perry, 25 " 355
Intendantof Livingston ats.
Harris, 28 " 577
Ireland ats. Field, 21 " 240
Irons V. Reynolds, 28 " 305
Isbell ats. Griffin 17 " 184
V. Maclin, 24 " 315
Iverson' ats. Nelson, 17 " 216
Iverson ats. Nelson, 19 Ala. 95
ats. , 24 " 9
Iverson & Robinson v. Du-bose,
27 " 418
Ivey V. McQueen, 17 " 408
lyey's Adm'r v. Owens and
Wife, 28 " G41
cr.
Jacko V. The State 22 " 73
Jacks and Wife ats. Han-son,
22 " 549
Jackson ats. Bush & Co.,-:. 24 " 273
ats. Lankford, 21 " 650
ats. Newton, 23 " 335
V. Shipman, 28 " 4SS
Jaco ats. Rodeu, 17 " 344
James V. State Bank, 17 " 69
Jeffries v. Harbin, 20 " 3S7
ats. Townsend, 24 " 329
ats. ,....17 " 276
Jelks V. McEae, 25 " 440
Jemison ats. Aston, 17 " 61
V. P. & M. Bank, ..17 " 754
V. ,..23 " 168
Jenkins ats. Gray, 24 " 516
V. McConico, 26 " 213
Jennings V. Blocker's Adm'r,25 " 415
ats. Whiteside,. . .19 " 784
Jesse V. Cater, 25 '• 351
-V. , 28 " 475
Jewell V. Center & Co ...... 25 " 493
Jewett&Co. ats. Ortez,...23 " 662
Johnson v.Bojdes, 26 " 576
ats. Brown, 17 " 232
—
ats. Crayton, 27 " 503
. V. Culbreath, 19 " 348
Ex parte, 18 " 414
ats. Frowner, 20 " 477
ats. , 28 " 580
-ats. Garner &NevilI,22 " 494
ats. Hamlet, 26 " 557
ats. Manning, 26 " 446
ats.Sammis) 22 « 690
ats. Stovall, 17 " 14
-v. The State 17 " 618
V. , 29 " 62
V. , 19 " 527
ats. Tarleton & Pol-lard,
25 " 300
ats. Thompson, 19 " 59
V. Thweatt, 18 " 741
v.Toulmin, 18 " 50
Johnson and Wife v. Collins,17 " 318 —^v. ,.20 " 435
V.King,...20 " 270
Johnston ats. Fogg & Van-derslice
27 " 432
TABLE OF CASES. XIX
Johnston ats. Harrison & Rol)-
inson, 27 Ala. 445
Johnston & Co. v. Button's
Adm'r, ; 27 " 245
Joliey V J Walker's Adm'rs, 26 " 090
Jones ats. Brown, 24 " 463
—v.Bnckley, 19 " 604 V.Cooper, 22 " 551
V. Covey, 26 " 404
ats. Cowan and Wife,27 " 317
V. CoAvies, 26 " 612
V.Dawson, 19 " 672
^ ats. Donncll, 17 " 689
ats. Dorrancc, 27 " 630
V. Over and Wife,. . .20 " 373
ats. Gowen & Co., 20 " 128
• V. Grahara, . 21 " 654
V. , 24 " 450
ats. Henry, 28 " 385
V.Jones, 18 " 248
ats. Lindsaj^, 23 " 835
V. Nirdlinger, 20 " 488
^v. Parks, ,..22 ". 446
V. Sterns, 28 •" 677
V.Stewart, 19 " 701
ats. Stokes, 18 " 734
ats. , 21 " 731
V. The State, ; . . 26 " 155
ats. Walker, 23 " 448
ats. Weaver, 24 " 420
ats. Zackowski, 20 " 189
Jones' Adm'r ats. Miller,. .26 " 247
ats. ,..29 " 174
Jones' Ex'rs v. Hoskins, ... 18 " 489
Jones & Blair V. Burden,. .20 " 382
Jordan v. Brewin & Bog-gan,
19 " 238
ats. Freeman & War-ren,
17 " 500
V. Gray, 19 " 618
ats. Hatton's Ad'rs,29 " 266
V. Jordan, 17 " 466
ats. Owen, ..,.27 " 608
V. , 27 " 152
V. Ronev, 23 " 758
ats. Ware, 21 " 837
Jordan's Adm'r v. Hubbard
and Wife, 26 " 433
Judd, Sons & Co. ats. Mc-
CuUoch, 20 " 703
Judge ats. Falkner, 19 " 177
V.Kerr, 17 " 328
V. Wilkins, 19 " 765
ats. Wilson,. ..... .18 " 757
Karsncr ats. Wightman,. . .20
Kavanaugli v. State Bank, 21
446
564
Keel ats. Adkinson, 25 Ala. 551
Keenan v. Comm'rs' Court
of Dallas, 26 " 568
Ex parte, 21 " 548
ats. Molett, 22 " 4PA
Keep V. Kelly & Levin,. . . .29 " 322
Keils & Sylvester ats. Pratt
& McKenzie, 28 " 390
Keith & Weir ats. Lankford, 21 " 342
Kelly v.- Brooks, 25 " 523
V. McCaw, 29 " 227
V. Payne, 18 " 371
ats. Perminter, 18 " 716
ats. Phillips,. .: 29 " 628
ats. Plunkett, 22 " 655
Kelly's Executors ats. West
&West,.. 19 " 353
Kelly fcFrazier ats. May,.. 27 " 497
Kelly & Levin ats. Keep,.. 29 " 322
Ke.mp V.Thompson, 17 " 9
Kennedy ats. Grant, 19 " 226
v.Holman&Howard,19 " 734
V. Millsap, 25 " 560
ats. RavvTls, 23 " 240
V. Stallworth 18 " 263
Kennedy's Ex'rs v. Rochon's
Heirs, 26 " 384
Kennedy's Heirs v. Rey-nolds,
27 '• 364
Kennedy & Merritt v. Young,25 " 563
Kent's Heirs ats. King, 29 " 542
Kern v. Burnham, . : 28 " 428
Kernochan ats.Boykin,. . . .24 " 697
Kerr ats. Judge Co. Court, 17 " 328
Ketchum ats. Emanuel, 21 " 257
Ketch-am & Smootv. Eslava,23 " 659
Kidd ats. Ala. & Tenn. Rivers
Railroad Co., 29 " 221
V. Montague, 19 " 619
Kidd & Co. ^^. Crowell,
Haightfc Co., 17 " 648
Kidd&Staintonv.MoMillan,21 " 325
Kimball v. Moody, 27 " 130
Kimbro V. Waller, -.21 " 376
King V. Collins, 21 " 363
Ex parte, 27 " 387
-. ats. Johnson and Wife, 20 « 270
V. Kent's Heirs, . . 29 " 542
V.King, 28 " 315
ats. Mays, 28 " 690
ats. McCartney, 25 " 681
V.Pope, 28 " 601
ats. Shackelford, 24 " 158
ats. Smith's Distribu-tees,
22 " 558
V.Stevens, 18 " 475
ats. , 21 " 429
King & Co. V. Hill, 20 " 133
King & Devitt ats. Drane,. . 21 " 556
XX TABLE OF CASES.
King & Owen v. McCaun,. .25 Ala. 471
Kingsland & Co. v. Forrest, 18 " 519
Kirby ats. Brooks, 19 " 72
Kirby's Adm'r v. Anders,. .26 " 466
Kirk ats. Reese, 29 " 406
Kirkland v. Gates, 25 " 465
ats. Self, 24 " 275
ats. Stewart, . 19 " 162
Kirkleyats. Segar, 23 " G80
V. , 20" 226
Kirkman ats. Fenner, 26 " 650
—V.Mason, 17 " 134
Kirkman, Abernathy & Hanna
V. Benham,. 28 " 501
Kirkman & Rosser v.'Pattou,! 9 " 32
Kirksey v. Dubose, 19 " 43
V. Fike, 27 " 383
V. , 29 " 206
ats. Montgomery's
Executors, .'..26 " 172
Kitclien V. Moye, 17 " 143
V. , 17 " 394
Knevals, Hall & Townsend
ats.Wiswall, 18 " 65
Knight V.Bell, 22 " 198
ats.Maxcy, 18 " 300
ats. Wiley, Banks &
Co., 27 " 336
Knight's Adm'rs v. Yarde-man,
25 '' 262
Knox ats. Anderson, 20 " 156
V. Fair, 17 " 503
ats. Sims & Jones,...18 " 236
Knox's Dist's V. Steele, 18 " 815
Krebs v. O'Grady, 23 " 726
Kyle V. Barnett, 17 " 306
^ V. Mavs, 22 " 673
V. -, 22 " 692
L. '
Labiizan ats. Roby, ...... 21 " 60
Ladiga's Heirs v. Rowland
'& Heifn-er, 21 " 9
Lamar v. Comm'r's Court
Marshall Co., 21 « 772
ats. Evans & Evans, 21 " 333
Lambert ats. Barlow, 28 " 704
Lamkin V. Ileyer, 19 " 228
Lampley V. Beavers, 25 " 534
V. Weed & Co.,. . .27 " 621
Land ats. Gibson, 27 " 117
Land and Wife v. Cowan,. 19 " 299
Landman ats. Hatton, 28 " 127
V. Snodgrass, 26 " 593
Lane ats. Moseley, 27 " 62
ats. Taliaferro, 23 " 369
Laney ats. Danfortb, 28 " 274
Lang V. Brown, 21 " 179
Lang ats. Goldsmith, Forch-eimer
& Co., 25 Ala.
V.Phillips,. 27 "
ats. Randall, .
.' 23 "
Lang's Heirs v. Waring,.-.l*^ "
V. ,...25 «
Langdon v. Raiford, 20 "
ats. Rolston,. . . .26 "
V. Williams, 22 "
Langwor-thy & Collins ats.
Owens, ...23
Lanier v. Driver, 24
V.Hill, 25
V. Branch Bank
Montgomery,.' 18
Lankford v. Jackson, 21
V. Keith & Weir,21
Lankford's Adm'r v. Barrett,29
Larkins v. Biddle, 21
Lassiter ats. Davis, 20
Lauderdale ats. Walker,.. 17
Lavenberg & Co. ats. Collins,19
Lawler V. Norris, 28
Lawson's Adm'r ats. Lay's
Executor, 23
V. — —, . 24
Lawson & Swincey v. The
State, 20
Lay's Executor ats. Lawson's
Adm'r, 24
V. -, 23
Lea ats. Thompson, ....... 28
Leachraan ats. Lee, 22
ats. Patterson,. . .19
ats.Pharis, 20
Leaird v. Davis, 17
V. 17
V. Moore, ; . . .27
LeaA'itt ats. Newcombe,. . .22
LeBaron ats. Chighizola,. .21
Lee ats. Cothran, 24
ats. Crothers, 29
V. Houston, 20
V. Leachman, 22
Lee & Ive}^ ats. Paulding,. 20
LeGrand ats. Godden,. . . .28
Lepretre ats.'Eslava, 21
Leseur and Wife ats. Moore,18
Lester ats. Mahan, 20 — V. , 25
Letondal v. Iluguenin,. . . .26
Leverett's Heirs v. Carlisle,19
Levin & Kelly ats. Keep,. .29
Lewis V. Cook & Mitchell,. 18
. V. Dubose & Co.,. . .29
ats. Ed wards, 18
V. Lewis, 25 —- ats. Marriott & Har-destv
25
486
311
751
145
625
532
660
681
837
149
554
625
650
342
700
252
561
359
682
675
377
184
65
184
377
453
452
745
662
27
448
326
631
406
380
337
301
452
753
158
504
606
162
445
552
80
322
334
219
494
315
332
TABLE OF CASES. XXI
Lewis ats. May, 22 Ala. 646
ats. Moore, 21 " 580
-ats. Sykes 17 " 261
ats. Wright........ 18 "• 194
Lightfootv.Lightfoot'sEx'r,27 " 351
ats. Stiles & Co.,. 26 " 443
Lightsey v. Harris 20 " 409
Lindsay v.GritHn, 22 " 629
V. Hoke & Abei'-
nathy, 21 " 542
V. The State, 19 " 560
V. Williams, 17 " 229
ats. Wright, 20 " 428
Lindsey v. Jones, 23 " 835
Linn V. Robinson &Pollard,21 " 547
Linton ats. Norton and
Wife, 18 " 690
Little ats Hair, 28 " 236
ats. Paissell, 28 " 160
Livingston V. Arrington,. .28 " 424
^ ats. Harris,.... 28 " 577
Locke's Ex'rv. Palmer,.... 26 " 312
Lockett V. Howze, 13 "' 613
LockLartand Wife v. Cam-eron,
29 " 355
Lodano v. The State, 25 " 64
Lodor V. Gayle, 29 " 412
ats. Rankin, Duryee
&Co., 21 " 380
Loftin V. Lyon & Baker,. . .22 " 540
V. Shackelford,.... 17 " 455
ats. Shearer, 26 " 703
Logan ats. Garrett & Hill,. 19 " 344
ats. Rowland, 18" 307
V. The State, 24 " 182
Long V. Comm'rs' Court But-ler
Co.; 18 '' 482
V.Davis, 18 « 801
v.McDougald's Adm'r,23 " 413
V. Rodgers, 17 " 540
V. , 19 « 321
v.The State, ..27 " 32
Long & Freeman ats. Doe d.
Tillman, 29 " 376
Loughridge V.Thompson,. 20 " 828
Love V. Crook, 27 " 624
V. Dargan, 21 " 583
^ V. Graham, 25 " 187
ats. Weeks, 19 " 25
Love & Co. V. Davis, 25 " 335
Loveless ats. Blackwilder,. 21 " 371
Lowe, Ex parte, .20 " 330
ats.Hair & Labuzan,."l9 " 224
Lowery ats. Easton, 29 " 454
Lowremore V. Berry, 19 " 130
• Lo wry ats. The State, 29 " 44
Lundie V. Bradford, 26 " 512
V. Cosper, 20 " 123
Lyde V. Taylor, 17 " 270
Lyle ats. Garrett, 27 Ala.
Lynch ats. Gfille, 21 "
Lyon ats. Worthy, 18 "
Lyon's Heirs v. Mottuse,. .19 "
Lyon & Baker ats. Loftin,. 22 «
ats. Swilley
& Riley, 18 "
Ljon & O'Neal ats. Brown,17 "
Mabry ats. McGinty, 23 "
Mabson ats.McLemore. . . .20 "
Machem v. Machera 28 "
Maclin V.Green, 29 "
. -ats.Isbell,: 24 "
Wilson, :.21
Maclin 's Heirs ats. Cooper, 25
Macon's Adm'r ats. McNeil, 20
Maddos ats. Pollard, 28
Magee v. Hallett & Walker, 22
ats. Tucker and Wife, 18
Magee & Reid ats. Hall, .... 27
Mahan v. Lester, 20
ats. , 25
Malempre ats.Etheridg^e,. .18
Malinda (slave) v, Gardner, 24
j\Iallory ats. Matlock, 19
Mallory's Ex'r ats. Smith &
Co., 24
Malone ats. Carroll,. .. 28
Malone's Executors ats. De-
Vendal, :..25
Mangham v. Cox & Waring, 29
Manning ats. Gilbreath,. . .24
'— V. Johnson, 26
Manning, 24
Mardis' Heirsats.Reynolds,17
j\laria ats. Wilson, 21
Marks ats. Seay, 23
Marlow ats. Calvert, 18
Marquis and Wife ats. Gib-son
29
Marriott & Hardesty v.
Lewis, 25
Marsh ats. Forward, 18
. ats. Perry,. 25
Marshall v. Betner, 17
v. Caudler, 21
v. Crow's Adm'r, 29
Martha v. The State, 26
Martin v. Barnev, 20
-^ V. Black's Ex'rs,. . ..20
V. : ,....21
V. Hardesty, 27
V. Higgins, 23
ats. Hollingsworth, 23
V. Martin's Ex'rs,. . .25
V. jMartin's Heirs, . . 22
586
579
784
463
540
552
659
672
137
374
695
315
670
298
772
321
699
99
414
162
445
5G5
719
694
628
521
272
81
418
446
386
32
379
532
67
668
332
645
659
832
490
278
72
369
309
721
458
775
591
201
86
XXI
I
TABLE OF CASES.
Martin V. Nail, 22
X. Williams, IS
Martin's Ex'rs ats. Martin,. 25
V. Smith,. . ..18
Martin's Heirs ats. Martin, 22
V. Tenison, . .26
Martin & FIjnn V. The State, 28
V. , 29
Mason ats. Ilamner, 24
ats. Kirkman,. 17
V. McNeill's Ex'rs, . 23
ats. Williamson and
Wife, , 23
ats. ,. . .18
Massej' v. Cole, 29
Masterson ats. Chamberlain
& Co., 29
V. — 26
Mastin v. Cnllom & Co.,. . ..28
Matheson's Heirs v. Hea-rin,
29
Matlock V. Mallory, 19
V. Thompson, IS
Matthews v. Douthitt and
Wife, 27
V. Robinson, 20
Matthews, Finley & Co. ats.
Sands & Co.,. . . .27
V. , 29
Maulden, Montague & Co.
V. Armistead, 18
Maull ats. Williams, 20
ijlaury v. Coleman, 24
Mawhinney & Smith ats.
Thompson, 17
Maxcy v. Knight, 18
Maxwell v. The State, 27
May V. Barnard, .20
May V. Kelly & Frazier,. . .27
ats. Kyle, 22
ats. , 22
V. Lewis, 22
May'vs Meirs v. Clay's Ad^-, 28
^lav & Bell V.Miller & Co., 27
MaV, Tindall & Co. v. Wil-liams,
17
Maynard v. Williams, 17
Mayor of Huntsville v.Phelps,2
Mobile ats. Barnes, 19
ats. Beronjohn. 27
ats. Brown,. . .23
ats. Burden,. . .21
•ats. Ganaway &
Kimball, 21
V. Rowland &
Co., 26
ats. St. John.
Powers & Co., 21
• ats. Stein, 17
Ala. 610
" 190
" 201
" 819
" 86
" 738
« 71
" 30
" 480
" 134
" 201
" 488
" 87
" 364
" 299
" 371
" 670
" 210
" 694
" 600
" 273
'• 130
" 399
" 136
" 500
" 721
" 381
'• 362
" 300
" 660
" 200
"• 497
" 673
" 692
" 646
" 141
" 515
" 23
" 676
7" 55
" 707
"• 58
" 722
« 309
" 577
" 498
" 224
" 234
Mayor of Mobile ats. Stein, 24 Ala
ats. The State, 24 "
--AVetumpkaats.Smoot.24 "
V. Winter, 29 '•
Mays V. King, 28 "
V.Williams, 27 "
Mazange ats. Mer. Ins. Co., 22 "
• V. glocum & Hen-derson,
23 "
McAdams ats. Cleave!and,.21 "
McAllister v. The State,. . .17 "
V. McDow, 26 '^
McArdle &Waters ats.Stein,24 "
ats. ,25 "
McArn ats. Edgar, 22 "
McBroom V. McBroom,. . . .19 "
V. ,....19 "
McBryde's Heirs v. Wilkin-son,
..29 "
McCall V. Doe d. Pryor, .... 17 "
McCall's Adm'r v. Capehart
& Harbin, 20 "
McCann ats. Comm'rs' Court
Butler Co., 23 "
ats. King &Owen,. .25 "
McCargo v. Crntcher, 23 '
McCargo & Cordle v.
Crutcher, 27 "
McCartney v. Calhoun,. . . .17 "
V. King, 25 '•
-^ ats. Pearsall, ... 25 "
^ ats. ,...28 "
McCauley v. The State, 26 "
McCaw ats. Kelly, 29 "
McClanahan ats. Scale,. . . .21 "
McClellan v. Allison,. .... .19 "
ats. Oliver, 21 "
V. Yoimg 17 '•
McClelland ats. Elliott, 17 "
McClung's Ex'rs v. Sp)ots-wood,
19 "
McCollum ats. Branch Bank
Decatur 20 "
ats. Caple, 27 "
ats. DeGraffenreid, 20 "
McConico v. Cannon, 25 '•
ats. Jenkins, 26 '
ats. Williams,. . . .25 "
ats. , 27 "
McCord ats. Sackett & Shel-ton,
23 "
McCoy ats. Edy, 20 "
-V. Odom, 20 "
McCoj' & Johnson ats. Bott, 20 "
McCrary, Ex parte, 22 "
^ ats. Tate & Tate, 21 "
ilcCravej' v. Rernson, 19 "
McCraw ats. Steamboat Far-mer,
26 ••
591
701
112
651
690
267
168
668
321
434
453
344
561
796
173
100
662
533
.799
471
575
171
301
681
461
110
135
227
345
671
675
498
206
165
280
461
280
462
213
538
572
851
403
502
578
65
499
430
189
TABLE OP CASES. XXlll
:McCreary v. Turk, 29 Ala. 244
ircCrellss v. Hinkle, 17 " 459
]vrcCroaii V. Pope, 17 " 612
McCulloch V. Judd, Sons &
Co., .20 " 703
McCuIlock and Wife v.
Walker andWifc,.... 20 " 389
^IcCiillough's Adm'r tits.
Bridge & Co., 27 " 661
3IcCurdy & Aldrick ats.
Williams, 22 " 696
McDade v. Uend, 18 " 214
V. The State, 20 " 81
McDaniel ats. Byrd, 26 " 582
McDevitt ats. Brainard,. . ..2b " 119
McDonald ats. Br. Bk.
!t[obiIe, 22 " 474
McDonnellv.Br.Bk.Mont.,20 " 313
McDougald's Ad'r ats.Banks,29 " 75
ats. Carey, 25 " 109
ats. ,..27 " 616
ats. Lang, 23 " 413
McDow ats. Byrne, 23 " 404
V. McAllister, 26 " 453
McElhaney V. Flynn, 23 " 819
V. The- State, . . .24 " 71
McElroy ats. Bunyard and
Wife, 21 " 311
ats. Rainer, 20 " 347
McEwen's Adm'r ats. Sims, 27 " 184
McFarland ats. Brooks,. . ..20 " 483
-McGar V.Williams, 26 " 469
McGehee V. Gewin, 25 " 176
V. Gindrat, 20 " 95
^ V.Godwin, 19 " 468
arts. Nesbitt, 26 " 748
ats. Spivey, 21 " 417
ats. , 24 " -476
V. The State, 26 " 154
McGinty V. Mabry, 23 " 672
McGlothlen ats. Bratton,. ..20 " 146
McGonegal V. Walker, 23 " 361
McGown V. Sprague, 23 " 524
McGrew & Beck v. Gover-nor,
19 " 89
McGrew & Harris v. Wal-ker,
17 " 824
McGuire ats. Moore, 26 " 461
V. Shelby 20 " 456
McHenry v. Wells, 28 " 451
Mcintosh V. Walker, 17 " 20
Mclvor ats. Rutherford,.. .21 " 750
McKenzie ats. Adams 18 " 698
V. Br. Bk. Mont, . 28 " 606
ats. Gerald and
Wife 27 " 166
ats. Royall's Ad'r, 25 " 363
V.Stevens, 19 ",691
McKinley v. Winston, 19 " 301
jMcKinney ats. Sloan, 19 Ala.
JMcKinstry ats. Gliddon,. . .25 "
ats. ,...28 "
McKissack v. Davis, 18 "
McLaue's Adm'r ats. Simon-ton,
25 "
McLane & Plowman v. Rid-dle
& Burt, 19 "
McLaren, Ragan & Co. v.
Bradford, 26 "
McLaughlin v. Godwin.. ..23 "
McLemore v. Bcnbow 19 "
ats. Mabson,. . . .20 "
McLeod ats. Gordon, 20 "
ats. Reid & Co.,.. .20 "
McLure v. Colclough, 17 "
McMaken v. McMaken,. . .18 "
Mcilichael v. Combey, . . . .19 "
McMillan ats. Firemen's In-surance
Co.,. ... .29 "
ats. Kidd & Stainton,2l "
McMillan & Son ats. Mutual
Insurance Co., 27 "
McNeil'v. Macon's Adm'r, 20 "
McNeill ats. Blount, 29 "
McNeill's Ex'rs ats. Mason, 23 "
McNeill & Forniss v. Easley,24 "
McQueen ats. Ivey, 17 "
McRaeats. Hill aiid Wife,. 27 "
ats. Jelks, 25 "
McTyer v. Steele, 26 "
iMcVay's Adm'r V. Ijams,..27 "
McVrhorter ats. Hopper,.. 18 "
McWilliams v. Ramsey,. . .23 "
Mead ats. McDadc,. ..... .18 "
Meade ats. Paulling, 23 "
Mealing ats. Steele, 24 "
Medlock ats. Agee, 25 '•
Melton V. Watkins, 24 "
Memphis & Charleston R. R.
Co. ats. Wooslej^ 28 "
Merchant's Ins. Co. v. Ma-zange,..
22 "
ats. Perry, . . .25 "
Meriweather ats.Harrington,20 "
]\Ierrill ats. Furlow's Adm'r,23 "
Merriwether v. Fames,. . . .17 "
Mervine v. Parker, 18 "
Metcalf V. Metcalf, ...19 "
]\richan and Wife v. Wyatt,21 "
Mickle V. The State, 27 "
Milam v. Ragland, . . -. 19 "
V.
—
, 25 "
stiller ats. Prater, 25 "
V. Jones' Adm'r,. . .26 "
V. ,....29 "
ats. Shackelford,.. 18 "
Miller's Distributees ats.
Gerald, 21 "
115
246
408
315
353
ISO
616
846
76
137
242
576
89
575
747
147
473
201
455
408
175
44.0
487
238
229
813
214
505
285
281
433
536
168
355
607
705
330
241
319
813
20
85
243
320
247
174
675
XXIV TABLE OP CASES.
Miller & Co . ats . May & Bell,27 Ala. 515
Miller and Wife ats. Flour-uoy's
Heirs, 26 " 724
Millard's Adm'rs V.Hall,.. 24 " 209
Mills V. Gerou, 22 " 669
ats. Nunn, 28 " 600
^v. The State, 20 " 86
Millsap ats. Kennedy, 25 " 560
Milner, Tinsley & Co. ats.
Fulton Ins. Co., 23 " 420
Mims ats. Flournoy, 17 " 36
ats. Shorter's Adm'rs,18 " 655
v.SturdevantandWife,23 " 664
Miras'Es'rs V. Sturdevant,.18 " 359
Minell & Co. v. Reed, 26 " 730
Minter ats. Blackburn,.... 22 " 613
Minter & Gayle v. Branch
Bank Mobile, 23 " 762
Mise ats. Parker, 27 " 480
Mitchell V. Billingsley,. . . .17 " 391
V. Cowsert and
Wife, 20 " 186
V.Gates, 23 " 438
ats. Hughes,.... 19 " 268
IMitchell and Wife v. Denson,26 " 360
V. ,.29 " 327
Mobile Bay Koad Co. v.
Teind,.... 29 " 325
Mobile School Comm'rs v.
Holt, 29 " 451
Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co.
V. The State, 29 " 57^
Mobley ats. Barnes, 21 " 232
V. , 26 " 718
V. Bilberry, 17 " 428
ats. , 20 " 260
ats. , 21 " 277
Modawell ats. Daniel,. .. .22 " 365
Molett V. Keenan, 22 " 484
Montague ats. Kidd, 19 " 619
Montgomery, £x parte,... 24: " 98
V. Givhan,..:.24 " 568
V. Montgomery,20 " 350
Montgomery's Executors v.
Kirksey, 26 " 172
Montgomery Man. Co. v.
Thomas, 20 " 473
Mo]>tgomery & West Point
R. R. Co. V. Varner,. . .19 " 185
Montg'y & Wetumpka P. R.
Co. V. Persse, Taylor & Co, . 25 " 536
V.Webb,..27 " 618
Moody ats. Kimball, 27 " 130
Mooney & Black v. Parker ,18 " 708
Moore V. Appleton, 26 " 633
ats. Barclay, 17 " 634
V. , 18 " 672
V. ^ 23 " 739
ats. Case & Pate, ... 21 " 758
Moore v. Clay, 24 Ala.
ats. Bearing, 26 "
ats. Drake, 18 "
v. Easley, 18 "
v. Fiqiiett, 19 "
ats. Leaird, 27 "
V. Leseur and Wife,18 "
V. Levert, 24 "
V. Lewis, 21 "
V. McGuire, 26 "
V. Moore, 17 "
V. , 18 "
ats. Otey, 17 "
V.Smith, 19 "
V. The State, 18
V. , 26
V. Wallis, 18
Moore & Border ats. Trapp
&Hill, 21
Moore & Jones v. Davidson,18 —: v.Henderson,18
Moore & Ligon ats. The
State, 19
Moore Sc Lyons v. Stainton,22
Jdooring v. Mutual Ins. Co.,2T
Morgan v. Smith, Wycoff
& Nicholl, 29
V. The State, 19
Morris v. Morris, 20
V. Russell, 20
•
—
• ats. Spivey, 18 —-—V. The State, 25 —'-— ats. Tatum & Smith,19
ats. Vanzant, 25
Morrison ats. Taylor, 26
V. , 21
Morrison and Wife ats.
Travis, 28
Morton ats. Boswell, 20
V. Bradley, 27
Morrow ats. Floyd, 26
V. Higgins, 29
ats. Turney's Adm'r,26
Moseleyats. Br.Bk.Decatur,19
ats. Grant,.. 29
ats. Horton, 17
V. Lane, 27
ats. Waring, 22
• ats. Wilkinson,. . . .18
V. ,. . .24
Mosser v. Mosser, 29
Mottuse ats. Lyon's Heirs,19
Monnger v. Burks, 17
Moye ats. Kitchen, 17
ats. 17
Mundy ats. Smith, 18
Munroe ats. Pritchett,. . . .22
Murdock v. Caruthers, 21
Murphy v. Barefield, 27
235
586
597
619
236
326
606
310
580
461
631
242
280
774
532
88
458
693-
209
232
514
831
245
283
556
168
357
2.54
57
302
285
728
779
494
235
640
353
448
339
222
302
794
62
667
288
411
313
463
48
143
394
182
501
785
634
TABLE OF CASES. XXV
Mnrphy ats. Hoyt, Ford &
Ptobinsou, 18 Ala.
ats. ,...23 "
ats. Wilkinson, 20 "
Murrah v. Br. Bk. Decatur,20 "
Murray V. The State, 18 '
j\Iurry & Durand ats. Tardy,! 7 "
V. ,.19 "
Miistin ats. Elmore, 28' "
Myatt ats. Sidgreaves,. . . .22 "
Myatt & Moore ats. Scott. . 24 "
Myers v. Gilbert, 18 "
3sr.
Nail ats. Martin, 22 "
Nance ats. Strickland,. .. .19 "
Napier v. Barry, 24 "
Nash ats. Amason, 19 "
ats. , 24 "
ats. Reid, 23 "
Nash & Robinson v.Shrader,27 "
Nashville & Chattanooga R.
R; Co. V. Peacock, 25 «
Nation v. Roberts, 20 "
Nave V. Berry, .22 "
Nelms V. Williams, 18 "
Nelms' Adm'r v. Shumake,.25 "
Nelson ats. Benning, 23 "
V. Bondm-ant, 26 "
V. Iverson, 17 "
V. , 19 "
V. 24 "
ats. Stanley, 28 "
ats. Wallace, 28 "
Nesbitt V. Drew, M7 "
ats. Harris, 24 "
V. McGehee, 26 "
NeSraith ats. Graham,. . . ,18 "
Newberry's Adm'r v. New-berry's
Distributees, . . 28 "
Newcombe V. Leavitt, 22 "
Newman ats. Graham & Rog-ers,
21 "
'V. Pryor, 18 "
ats. Stallings, 26 "
Newton V. Jackson, 23 "
Nichols V. Stewart, 20 "
Nicholson v. The State,. . .18 "
Nicolas V. Trickey, 19 "
Nimrao V. Stewart, 21 "
Niolin V. Hammer, 22 "
Nirdlinger ats. Jones, 20 "
Nixon V. Robbing, 24 "
Nolen V. Palmer, 24 "
Noles V. TJie State, 24 "
V. , 26 "
Nolin V. Parmer, 21 "
Norris ats. Lawler, 28 "
4
31G
456
104
392
727
585
710
309
617
489
467
610
233
511
104
279
733
377
229
544
382
650
126
801
341
216
95
9
514
282
379
398
748
763
691
631
497
186
300
335
358
529
92
682
578
488
663
391
672
31
66
675
Norris v. Xorris, 27 Ala.
Norris, Stodder & Co. ats.
Cottrell, 20 "
Norton and Wife v. Linton,.!
8
"
Nugent V. The State, 18 "
V. , 19 "
Nunn V.Mills, 28 "
O.
Gates ats. Kirkland, 25
Ochtalomiats. Sauford,. . . .23
O'Connor ats. Carradine,. .21
Odom ats. McCoy, 20
Odum ats. Thomason, 23
Ogletree v. The State, 28
O'Grady ats. Krebs, 23
O'Hara ats. Stevenson,. .. .27
Oliver ats. Friend, 27
V. McClellan, 21
ats. Pickens and
Wife, 29
-V. The State........ 17
O'Neal V. Brown, 20 — -V. , 21
-v. Wilson, 21
O'Reilly's Adm'r v. Brady, .28
O'Ptiley ats. Sc'li'r Southron,2.1
Ortez V. Jewett & Co., 23
Osbourne & Co. ats. Griffan.20
Oswald V. Godbold, 20
Otey V. Moore, 17
Otis V. Thorn, 18
Otis & Jayne V. Thorn,.... 23
Owen ats. Jordan, 27
V. , 27
V. Slatter, .26
Owen & King v. McCann,. .25
Owen & Russell ats. Pulliam,25
Owens V. Collins & Lang-worthy,
23
-—.—-ats. Colvin, 22
V. Echols, 28
V. White, 28
Owens and Wife ats. Ivey's
Adm'r, 28
Owners of Steamboat Far-mer
v. McCraw, 26
Ozley V. Ikelheimer, 26
Pace and Wife V. Bonner,. 27 •' 307
Pait V. Pait, 19 '• 713
Palmer v. Benson, 19 " 594
V. Bice, 28 " 430
ats. Locke's Ex'r,.. 26 - 312
ats. Nolen, 24 " 391
ats. Walker, 24 •' 358
5! 9
304
690
521
540
600
465
669
573
502
480
693
726
362
532
675
528
587
510
482
288
530
228
662
594
811
280
395
469
152
608
547
471
492
837
782
689
413
641
189
XXVI TABLE OF CASES.
Parhara ats. Cook & Scott, . 24 Ala. 21
ats. Wolfe, 18 " 441
Parish V. Gates, 29 " 254
Parker v.Bnrgen&Pearsall,20 " 251
ats.Mervine, 18 " 241
V. Mise, 27 " 480
ats.Mooney&Black,18 " 708
Parks ats. Jones, 22 " 446
Parmer ats. Nolin, 21 " 66
Parmley ats. Rives, 18 " 256
Parrish v. Branch Bank
Montgomery, 20 " 433
Parsons V. Boyd, 20 " 112
— -v. The State, 21 " 300
V. , 22 " 50
Partridge v. Forsyth, 29 " 200
Patterson v. Gaston, 17 " 223
ats. Hanson, 17 " 738
V. Leachman,. . . .19 " 745
ats. Robertson,.. 17 " 407
V. The State,.... 21 " 571
ats. Worthy,
Brown & Co.,... 20 " 172
Patton V. Crow, 26 " 426
v.Hamner, 28 " 618
ats. Kirkman & Ros-ser,
19 " 32
Patton & Burgen v. Rambo,20 " 485
Paul, Cook & Co. ats. Flash,
Hartwell&Co., 29 " 141
Paulding v. Lee & Ivey, ... 20 " 753
V. Watson & Eid-son,
21 " 279
Paullingv. Meade, 23 " 505
V. Watson, 26 " 205
Payne V. Governor, 18 " 320
V.Kelly, 18 " 371
Peacey v. Peacey, 27 " 683
Peacock v. Nashville & Chat-tanooga
R. R. Co 25 " 229
Peake v. Yeldell, 17 " 636
Pearsall V. McCartney,. .. .25 " 461
V. ^ ,....28 " 110
Pearson v. Bailey, 23 " 537
V. Darrington, 18 " 348
V. , 21 •' 169
V.Ross, 21 " 473
• -ats. Smith, 24 " 355
ats. , 26 " 603
Peck ats. Ewing, 26 " 413
Peck & Clark ats. Cooper,. 22 " 406
ats. Ewing,.. 17 " 339
V. Wallace &
Lewis. 19 " 219
Pennington v. Woodall,. . .17 " 685
Perkins V. Perkins, 27 " 479
Pcrminter V. Kelly 18 " 716
Perrine V. Carlisle, 19 " 686
V. Firemen's Ins. Co.,22 " 575
Perrine ats. Governor, 23 Ala.
Perry ats. Chambers, 17 "
ats. Dupree, 18 "
V. Graham, 18 "
V. Marsh, 25 "
v.Merch'tsIns. Co.,...25 "
Ferryman v. Camp, 24 "
Ex parte, 25 "
Persse, Taylor & Co. v. M. k
W. Plank Road Co.,... 25 "
Pettibone v. The State, .... 19 "
Pettway v. Ala. Life Ins. &
Trust Co., 24 "
Petty V. Boothe, 19 "
V. Gayle, 25 "
Pfister ats. Riggs, 21 "
Pharis V. Leachman, 20 "
Phelan ats. Winter, 27 "
Phelps V. Mayor of Hunts-ville,...'
27 "
Phenix ats.- Cain, 29 "
Phillips ats. Bridges & Co.,25 "
ats. Gantt's Adrn'r, .23 "
V.Kelly, 29 "
ats. lyang, 27 "
V. Poindexter, 18 "
ats. Spoor, 27 "
Picard ats. Goldsmith, For-cheimer
& Co., 27 "
Pickens v. Tarborough's
Adm'r, 26 "
Pickens and Wife v. 01iver,29 "
Pickett ats. Abney, 21 ''
, Exparte, 24 "
ats. Price, 21 "
Pickle's Adm'r V. Ezzell,..27 "
Pike V. Bright 29 "
Pinckard v. Pinckard, 23 "
V. , 24 "
ats. Thrasher &
Mitchell, 23
Pipkin V. Hewlett, 17
Pitts V. Wooten's Es'rs,. . .24
Plank-Road Co. ats. Powell,24
V. Sammons
& Dotes... 27
V. Webb , . 27
Pleasant v. The State, 17
Plumb & Robbins ats. Hen-derson,
18
Plunkett V.Kelly,..' 22
Poacher v. Weisinger 20
Poe V.Davis, 29
V. Dorrah 20
Pollard V.Cocke, 19
v.Maddox, 28
V. Scears' Adm'r,..28
Pond V. Yanderveer, 17
V. Wadsworth 24
807
726
34
822
659
355
438
79
536
386
514
633
472
469
662
649
55
374
136
275
628
311
579
193
142
417
528
739
91
741
623
332
649
250
61
G
291
474
441
380
618
190
74
655
102
676
288
188
321
484
426
531
TABLE OF CASES. XXV11
Pool V. Cummiiigs & Co.,. ..20 Ala. 563
V. Harrison, 18 " 514
V. Hodnett & Hays, . . .18 • " 752
Pool's Ex'r V. Relfe, 23 " 701
Pope ats. King, ..28 " 601
ats. McCroan, 17 " 612
V. Welsh's Adnvr,. . . .18 " 631
Porter ats. Ilciuy, 29 " 619
V.Williams, 22 " 525
Portwood ats. Dent, 17 " 242
ats. , 21 « 588
Pounds V. Richards, 21 " 424
ats. Wheeler, 24 " 472
Powell V. Central Plank-
Road Co., 24 " 441
V.Glenn, 21 « 458 — ats. Hadden's Ex'rs, 17 " 314
V. . , 21 " 745
ats. Huggins, 19 " 129 —-—-v. The State, 19 " 577
V. , 25 " 21
V. , 27 " 51
V.Stewart, 17 " 719
V. Summers, 17 " 647
Powell's Adm'r v. Henry, . . 27 " 612
Powell & Bradley ats. Collier ,23 " 579
Prater v. Miller, 25 " 320
v.StinsonandWife,26 " 456
Prater's Adm'r v. Darby,. .24 " 496
Pratt ats. Clarke, 20 " 470
Pratt & McKenzie v. Keils
& Sylvester, 28 " 390
PrattvilleMan.Co.ats.Smith,29 " 503
Presley and Wife ats. Fra-lick,
29 « 457
Preslor ats. Hinson, 27 " 643
Preston v. Dunn, 25
' " 507
Price V. Br. Bk. Decatur,. .17 " 374
ats. Hanna, 23 " 826
V.Pickett 21 « 741
-V.Price, 23 " 609
ats. Simmons, 18 " 405
V. , 21 " 337
V. Talley's Adm'rs,..,18 " 21
Price & Simpson v, Gillespie,28 " 279
Prince v. Bates, 19 " 105
Pritchett v. Munroe, 22 " 501
V. The State, 22 « 39
Pryorv. Beck, 21 " 393
ats.Doe J.McCall...l7 " 533
ats. Newman, 18 " 186
Pugh ats. Armstrong, 19 " 209
Palliam v. Owen &; Russell, 25 " 492
Purdom & McBroom v. Mc-
Broom, 19 " 110
Purdy ats. Woodward, 20 " 379
Purser ats. Homer, 20 " 573
Putnam, Ex jmrte, 20 " 592
Qnavles v. Quarles, 19 Ala. 363
v. Waldron and
Wife, 20 " 211
JR.
Ragland ats. Milam, 19 " 85
ats. , 25 " 243
Raiford v. Governor, 29 " 382
ats. LangdoD, 20 " 532
ats. Upson, 29 " 188
Railroad Co. v. Burke, 27 " 535
ats.Connoly29 " 373
V.Harris,.... 25 " 232
V. Kidd, 29 " 221
V. Peacock,...25 " 229
V. The State,..29 " 573 — ats. Woosley, 28 " 536
Rain ats. Boykin,. ...» 28 " 332
Rainer v. McElroy, 20 " 347
Rainey v. Capps, 22 " 288
Rambo ats. Patton & Bur-gen,
20 " 485
ats. Wyatt's Adm'r, 29 " 510
Raimer ats. Fletcher, 29 " 470
Ptamey V. Green, ,..18 " 771
V. Holcombe, 21 " 567
Ramsay ats. McWilliaras,. .23 " 813
Randall ats. Beene's Heirs, 23 " 514
V.Lang, 23 " 751
V. Shrader, 20 " 338
V. , 17 " 333
Randolph ats. Gardner, 18 " 685
Raney and Wife ats. Allen
and Wife, 19 " 68
Rankin, Durvee »fe Co. v.
Lodor,." 21 " 380
Rawdon V. Rawdon, 28 " 565
Rawlsv. Doe d. Kennedy,..23 « 240
ats. Sparks, 17 " 211
Read v. Walker, 18 " 323
Reaves ats. Stevenson,. . . .24 '•' 425
Redman ats. Colgin, 20 " 650
Reed ats. Minell & Co.,... 26 " 730
Reese V. Beck, 24 " 651
ats. Beville, 25 " 451
ats. Falk & Rosen-thal,
19 " 240
V. Gresham, 29 " 91
V.Harris, 27 " 301
V. Kirk, 29 " 406
. V. Reese, 23 " 785
Reeves ats. Bagby, 20 " 427
V. The State, 20 " 33
Reid ats. Earle, 25 " 463
V.Nash, ..23 " 733
Reid & Magee ats. Hall, ... 27 " 414
XXVIU TABLE OF CASES.
Relfe ats. Pool's Ex'r, 23 Al
Rembert & Hale v. Brown,lT
Remson, Ex parte, 23
ats. McCravey,. . .19
Reynolds ats. Griffin, IT
ats. Hogan, 21
ats. Irons, 28
ats. Kennedy's
Heirs, 27
V. Mardis' Heirs,. 17
ats. Tomkies,. . . .17
Rhodes v. Turner and "Wife,21
Rice ats. Anderson 20
V. Dillahunty, 20
ats. Ijauis & Carr,. . . .17
Richards ats. Pounds, ... .21
Richardson v. Richardson,2-l
ats. The State, 18
V. Dormau's Ex"rs,.28
Ricks ats. Drew, 17
Riddle v. BrowE, 20
ats. Cruise, ....... 21
V. Hanna, 25
Riddle & Burt ats. McLane
^ Plowman 19
Riddle & Co. ats. Stockdale.22
Ridgeway ats. Beall & C0..I8
Riggs ats. Pfister, 21
Rilev Sc Dawson ats. Doe d.
Saltonstall and Wife, . . 28
Risen ats. Cochran, 20
Rives V. Baptiste,. . . . . . . .2.5
V. Parudsy 18
. V. Toulmin, 19
V. , 25
Roach ats. Screws, 22
Robbins, Ex parte, 29 — ats. Hurter, 21
ats. Xixon, 2-1
-.^ V. The State 20
Roberson v. Roberson,. . . .21
:-r= ats. Ware, 18
Roberts ats. Andress, 18
ats. Dunham, 27
ats. , 28
. . ats. Godbold, 20
V. Heim. 27 — ats. Nation, 20
V. The State, 19
V. Trawick, ....... 17
V. 22
Robertson ats. Brancli Bank
Mobile, 19
ats. C<;leman, 17
V. Davenport & Pat-terson,
27 — V. Patterson, 17
' V. Smith 18
ats. , 23
701
G67
25
430
198
56
305
364
32
109
210
239
399
404
424
395
109
679
25
412
791
484
180
678
117
469
164
463
382
256
288
452
675
71
585
663
36
273
105
387
701
286
3.54
678
544
526
55
490
798
84
574
407
220
312
Robinson ats. Ashley's Ad'r,29 Ala.
V. Drumraond, .... 24 "
V. Dunlap, 28 "
ats. Grady, 28 "
ats. Holt 21 "
ats. Matthews,.. .20 "
' ats. Rugely & Har-rison.
19 "
ats. Yaughan,. . .20 " .
ats. ,. .22 "
Robinson & Pollard ats.Linn,21
Roby V. Labuzan, 21
Rochon's Heirs ats. Kenne-dy's
Executor, 26
Roden v. Jaco, 17
Rodgers ats. Foster, 27
ats. Long, 17
ats. .• 19
V. The State, 26
Rogers v. Bradford, 29
V. Grannis & Co.,. .20
Roland v. Logan, 18
.Rolston V. Langdon, 26
Roney ats. Jordan, 23
Rood V. Eslava, i.7
Root ats. Hall 19
Roper V. Roper, 29
Roquemore ats. Hussey,. . . 27
V. The State, ... 1
9
Rose V. Thompson, 17
Ross ats. Crothers, 17
ats. Enis, 19
V. Hannah IS
V. Pearson, 21 —— V.Ross, 21
^v. , ,20
Rossett v. The State, 17
Roundtree ats. Salmons,. . .24
Rowan v. Hutchisson, 27
Rov,land v. Day, 17
, Ex parte, 26
ats. Smith 18
V.Walker, 18
Rowland oc Co. ats. Maj-or
of Mobile, 26
Rowland's Adui'rs ats. Har-ris,
23
V. Shelton, 25
Rowland & Heifner v. Ladi-ga's
Heirs, 21
Roy v. Segrist, 19
Royall's Adm'r v. ]McKenzie,25
Rudolph ats. Collins, 19
Rugely & Hannson v. Rob-inson,
19
Rumblv v. Stainton and
Wife 24
Rusli ats. Hitt & Wade,. . .22
Russell V. Desplous, 25
112
174
100
289
106
130
404
229
519
547
60
384
344
602
540
321
76
474
247
307
660
758
430
378
247
281
528
628
816
239
125
473
322
105
496
454
328
681
133
665
749
498
644
217
9
810
363
616
404
712
563
514
TABLE OF CASES. XXIX
Russell V. Desplous, 29 Ala. 308
, Ex parte, 29 " 717
V. Little, 28 " 160
ats. Morris, 20 " 357
V. Wood, 22 " 645
Rnssel!& Owen ats. Pulliaiii,25 " 492
lUitherford V. McIvor,-.,...21 " 750
Rutherford's Adm'r v. Smith,27 " 417
S-Satkctt
& Shelton v. Mc-
Cord, ..23 " 851
Saint ats. Bettis, 28 " 214
Sallee V. Waters, 17 " 482
Salmons V. Roundtree,. . ..24 " 458
Salomon V. The State, 27 " 26
V. , 28 " 83
Saltmarsh ats. Bird, 19 " 665
ats. Bower & Co.,19 " 274
V. , ... 22 " 221
^ V. Crommelin,. . .24 " 347
V. P. & M. Bank,. 17 " 761
Saltonstall and Wife ats. Ri-ley
& Dawson, 28 " 164
Samini ats. Gahnzac & Co. ,.29 " 288
Sammis V. Johnson,.: 22 " 690
Sammons & Dotes ats. Cen-tral
Plank-RoadCo.,. . .27 " 380
Sanders V. Godley, 23 " 473
V. The State, (note,) 25 " 63
ats. Wainright &
Twelves, 20 " 602
Sands & Co. v. Matthews,
Finley & Co., -.27 « 399
. ats. , 29 " 136
Sanford ats. Ewing, 19 " 605
ats. -, 21 " 157
V. Howard, 29 " 684
V. Ochtalomi, 23 " 669
Sankey v. Sankey, 18 " 713
Sarah (slave) V. Gardner,. .24 " 719
Sartor v. Branch Bank Mont-gomery,.
. .29 " 353
Sasnett V.' Weathers, 21 " 673
Satterwhite v. The State,. .28 '" 65
Saunders V. Saunders, ... .20 " 710
ats. Stewart Ge.orge,l 9 " 744
Savage V. Benham, 17 " 119
Savage & Darrington v.
Walshe & Emanuel, ..24 " 293
V. ,.26 " 619
Savery ats. Spence, 25 " 723'
Scears' Adm'r ats. Pollard,28 " 484
School ComniTs ats. Holt,. 29 " 451
Schooner Louisiana v. Fet-typlace,
Goodman &C0.2I " 286
Southron v.O'Riley ,21 '• 223
Scitz v. The State, 23 " 42
Scoggin V. Slater, 22 Ak
Scott V. Coxe's Adm'rs,; . . .20 "
ats. Hopkins, 20 "
V. Myatt & Moore,.. 24 "
Screws v. Roach, « . .22 "
Scurlock ats. Freeman,. . . .27 "
Seaborn (slave) v. The
State 20 •'
Seabury v. Doe d. Stewart
& Easton, 22 "
Scale V. McClanahan, 21 "
Sears & Walker ats. Hark-ness,
26 "
Seawell ats. State Bank,. . .18 "
V.Greenwood, 21 "
Seay v. Marks 23 "
Segar ats. Kirkley, '. .20 "
: V. , 23 "
Segars ats. Henderson,. . . .28 "
Segrist ats. Ro}^ 19 "
Self V. Kirkland, 24 "
Sellers & Cook ats. Haynes,17 "
Shackelford v. Kin,g, 24 "
ats. Loftin, 17 "
-:—— V. Miller, 18 "
V. P. & M. Bank, ... 22 "
V.Tate, 24 "
Shadden v. Sterling's Ad'rs,23 "
Shahan ats. Dill, 25 "
Shaw V. Beers, 25 "
V. The State, 18 "
V. White, 28 "
Shearer V. Loftin 26 "
ats. Tiller,. 20 "
ats. , 20 "
Shelby ats. McGuire, 20 "
Shelley v. Graves, 29 "
Shelton ats. Rowland's
Adm'rs^ 25 "
Shepard ats. Halstead,. . . .23 "
Shepherd & Gordon v.
Spriggs, 29 "
Sheppard v. Furniss, 19 "
ats. Wilson 28 "
Sherrod v. Davis, 17 "
V. Hampton, 25 "
V. The State, 25 "
Shields & Paulding ats.
Springle's Heirs, 17 "
Shipman v. Baxter, 21 "
^— ats. Jackson, 28 ''
Shomo V. Caldwell, 21 "
Shorter v. Urquhart, 28 '•
Shorter's Adm'r v. Minis, ..18 "
Shrader ats. Curry & Groce,19 "
ats. Nash & Robin-son,
27 '•'
ats. Randall, 17 •'
ats. , 20 "
687
294
179
4r,ft
67.0
407
15
207
345
493
616
491
532
226
680
352
810
275
749
158
455
675
238
510
518
694
449
547
637
703
527
596
455
385
217
558
673
760
623
312
652
78
295
456
488
^148
360
655
831
000
33S
XXX TABLE OF CASES.
Shumake v. Nelms' Arlm'r, 25 Ala. 126
Sibley's Heirs ats. Bondu-rant......
.29 " 570
Sidgreaves v. Myatt, 22 " 617
Simmons V. Bull, 21 " 501
V.Price 18 " 405
ats. , ..21 " 337
ats. Spence, 21 " 563
ats. Stainton'sAd'rs,24 '' 410
-ats. Staunton, 20 " 243
ats. Trammell, 17 " 411
ats. Waldron, Isley
& Co., 28 " 629
V.Walker, 18 " 664
ats. Williams, 22 " 425
V. , 27 " 507
Simonton v.McLane's Ad'r,25 " 353
Simpson v. Talbot, 25 " 469
Sims V. McEweu's Adm'r,..27 " 184
ats. Williams, 22 " 512
Sims &. Jones V. Knox,. .. .18 " 236
Sistrunk ats. Corbin, 19 " 203
Skains & Lewis v. The State,21 " 218
Skeates & Co. ats. Stewart
George, 19 " 738
Skinner ats. Barney 19 " 698
Skipper v. Foster, 29 " 330
Slater ats. Scoggin, 22 " 687
ats. Whitsett, Garner
& Co., 23 " 626
Slatter ats. Owen, 26 " 547
Slaughter V. Cunningham,. .24 " 260
Slaughter's Adm'r ats. Col-lier,
20 " 263
ats. ,..22 " 671
Sledge ats. Horton, 29 " 478
Sloan V. McKinney, 19 " 115
Slocum & Henderson ats.
Frankenheimer, ,.24 " 373
.- V. Muzange,. . . 23 " 668
Small, Ex parte, 25 " 74
Smelser v. Drane, 19 " 245
Smith ats. Allen, 22 " 416
^v. Anders' 21 " 782 ^— ats. Bryant 22 " 534
^v. Causey, 22 " 568
V. , 28 " 655
ats. Desha & Sheppard,20 " 747
ats. Dumas, 17 " 305
ats. Dunn, 27 " 315
V. Ewers, 21 " 38
, Ex parte,
.^ 23 " 94
ats. Glasscock,. .' 25 " 474
ats. Hamner, 22 " 433
ats. Hooks, 18 " 338 —-V. , 19 " 101
ats. Hooper's Ex'r,.. .23 " 639
V. , ... 20 " 245
V. Kimr, 22 " 558
Smith V. Martin's Ex'rs, .... 18 Ala. 819
ats. Moore, 19 " 774
V. Mundy, 18 " 182
V.Pearson, 24 " 355
V. , 26 " 603
V. Prattville Man. Co.,29 " 503
ats. Ptobertson, 18 '' 220
V. , 23 " 312
V.Rowland,. 18 " 665
ats.Ptutherford's Ad'r,27 " 417
V.Smith's Adm'rs,...21 '• 761
V. The State, 23 " "^9
ats. Van Eppes, 21 " 317
ats. Walden, 29 " 417
ats. Walker and Wife,28 " 569
V.Wiley, 19 " 217
V. , 22 " 396
V. Wooding, '.
. . .20 " 324
Smith's Heirs v. Branch
Bank Mobile, 21 " 125
Smith & Co. v.Mallory'sEx'r.,24 " 628
Smith, Dabney & Co. v.
Armistead, 17 " 282
Smith & Gareyv. Awbrey,19 " 63
Smith & Loveless ats. Hall,20 " 777
Smith, Wykoff & Nicholl
ats. Morgan, 29 " 283
Smitherman v. The State,. .27 " 23
Smyth V. Tankersley, 20 " 212
Smoot V. Mayor of Wetump-ka,
24 " 112
Smoot & Ketchum v. Eslava,23 " 659
Snedicor V. Davis, 17 " 472
Snodgrassv.Br. Bk.Decatur,25 " 161
ats. Landman, 26 " 593
ats. Swink's Adm'r,17 " 653
ats. West, Oliver &
Co.,.' 17 " 549
Spaight V. The State, 29 " 32
Sparks ats. Eastland, 22 " 607
V. Rawls, 17 " 211
Spears ats. Weathers, 27 " 455
Spence ats. Chapman, 22 " 588
v.Savery, 25 " 723
V.Simmons, 21 " 563
v.The State, 17 " 192
Spencer v. , 20 "^ 24
-
—
V. Thompson and
Wife, 24 " 512
ats. Waters, 22 " 460
Spivey V. McGehee, 21 " 417
V. , 24 " 476
V.Morris, 18 " 254
V. The State, 26 " 90
Spoor V.Phillips, 27 " 193
Spotswood ats. McClung's
Executors, 19 " 165
Spradling & Thomas v. The
State, 17 '< 440
TABLE OF CASES. XXXI
Sprague ats. McGown,. . . .23 Ala.
Spvagiie & Winston v. Znnts,18
Spriggs ats. Shepherd &
Gordon, 29
Springle's Heirs v. Shields
& Paulding, 17
Srygley ats. Crownover, ... 19
St. John, Powers & Co. ats.
Bank of St. Mary's,. . .25
V. Mayor of Mobile,21
Stainton ats. Moore & Lyons, 22
ats. Piumbly, 24
V. Simmons, 24
Stallings v. Finch, 25
V. Newman, 26
Stalls V. The State, 28
Stallworth ats. Kennedy,. .18
V. Stallworth,. .29
Standefer ats. Ewing, 18
Stanley v. Bank of Mobile,23 "
V. Nelson, 28
Stanley & Elliott v. The
State, 26
Stapleton v. Stapleton,. . . .21
Starr v. The State, 25
V. , 25
State ats. Agee, 25
ats
ats,
ats
ats,
ats
Anthonj^ 29
Antpnez, 26
Arnold, ....25
29
Arthur, 22
ats. Baalani, 17
ats. Barrett, 24
ats. Batre, 18
ats. Beasley, 1-8
ats. Ben, 22
— ats. Bill, 29 -ats. Bob 29
ats. Boltze, 24
ats. Boullemet, 28
V. Brantley, 27
ats. Brister, 26
ats. Brock, 26
ats. Brown, . / 27
ats. Bryan, 26
ats. Burdine, 25
ats. Bush, , 18
ats. Butler, 22
ats. Bythwood, 20
ats. Camp, 27
ats. Campbell,. ...... 17
ats. , 23
ats. Caroline, 20
ats. Carpenter, 23
ats. Carroll, 23
ats. Case., ...26
V. Castleberry, 23
V. Centreville Br, Cq.,18
524
382
673
295
251
566
224
831
712
410
518
300
25
263
76
400
652
514
26
587
38
49
67
27
81
69
46
61
451
74
119
535
9
34
20
- 89
83
44
107
104
47
65
60
415
43
47
53
369
44
19
84
28
17
85
678
State ats. Chambers, 26 Ala. 59
ats. Clark, 19 " 552
ats. Cobb, 19 " 18
ats. Coleman, 20 " 51
ats. Corley, 28 " 22
ats. Crist, .21 " 137
ats. Crow, 18 " 541
ats. Dale &; Under wood,27 " 31
ats. Dave,. .
.' 22 " 23
ats. Davis, 17 " 354
ats. , -...17 " 415
— at5. Davis & Ferguson, 19 " 13 - ats. DeBernie, 19 " 23
ats. Dill, 25 " 15
ats. Drinkard, 20 " 9
ats. Edmundson, 17 " 179
ats. Elam, 25 " 53
ats. , 26 " 48
ats. Elliott, 26 " 78
ats. Eskridge, 25 " '30
ats. Eubanks, 17 " 181
ats. Felix, 18 " 720
ats. Flake, 19 " 551
ats. Flanagan, 19 " 546 ——• ats. Francois, 20 " 83
ats. Frank, 27 " 37
ats. Franklin, 28 "
9
. -ats. , 29 " 14
ats. Ganaway, 22 " 772
ats. Hale, 24.
" 80
ats. Ham, 17 " 188 —— ats. Harrall, 26 " 52
ats. Harrison, 24 " 67
ats. Hirschfelder, 18 " 112
ats. , 19 " 534
ats. Holmes, 23 " 17
ats. Huffman, 28 " 48
ats. , 29 " 40
ats.Hurt, 19 " 19
ats. Ingram, 27 " 17
ats. Jacko, 22 " 73
ats. Johnson, 17 " 618
ats. , 19 « 527
ats. , 29 " 62
ats. Jones, 26 " 155
ats.Lawson &Swinney,20 " 65
ats. Lindsay, 19 " 560
ats. Lodano, 25 " 64
ats. Logan, 24 " 182
ats. Long, 27 " 32
V. Lowry, 29 " 44
ats. Martha, 26 " 72
ats. Martin & Flynn,. . 28 " 71
ats. ,. . .29 " 30
ats. Maxwell, . .
.'. 27 " 660
V. ]\rayor .of Mobile, . . 24 " 701
ats. McAllister, 17 " 434
ats. McCauley, ..26 " 135
ats. McDade 20 " 81
XXXll TABLE OF CASES.
State ats. McElhanev 24 Ala. 71
ats.McGehee,."' 26 " 154
ats. Mickle, 27 " 20
ats. Mills, 20 " 86
-ats. Moore 18 " 532
ats. , 26 " 88
ats. Moore & Ligon, . . 19 " 514
ats. Morgan, 19 " 556
ats. Morris, 25 " 517
ats. Murraj^ 18 " 727
ats.Noles, 24 " 672
ats. —, 26 " 31
ats. Nugent, 19 " 540
ats. , 18 « 521
ats. Nicholson 18. " 529
ats. Ogletree, 28 " 693
ats. Oliver,.'. 17 " 587
ats. Parsons, 21 " 300
— ats. , 22 " 50 =- ats. Patterson, 21 " 571
ats. Pettibone, 19 " 586
ats. Pleasant, 17 " 190
ats. Powell,. ... ; 19 " 577
ats. , 25 " 21
ats. , 27 " 51
ats. Pritchett, 22 " 39
ats. Railroad Co. (Mo-bile
& Ohio.) 29 " 573
ats. Reeves, 20 " 33
V.Richardson, ...18 " 109
ats.Robbins, 20 " 36
ats. Roberts, 19 " 526
ats. Rodgers, 26 " 76
ats.Roquemore 19 " 528
ats. Rossett, 17 " 496
ats. Salomon, 27 " 26
ats. , 28 " 83
ats. Saunders, (note,). 25 " 63
ats. Satterwhite, 28 " 65
ats. Scitz, 23 " 42
ats. Seaborn & Jim,. ..20 " 15
ats. Shaw, 18 " 547
^ ats. Sherrod, 25 " 78
ats. Skains & Lewis, . . 21 " 218
ats. Smith, 22 " 54
ats. , 23 " 39
ats. Smitherman, 27 " 23
ats. Spaight, 29 " 32
ats. Spence, 17 " 192
ats. Spencer, 20 " ' 24
ats. Spivey, : .26 " 90
ats. Spradling k Tho-mas,
17 " 440
ats. Stalls, 28 " 25
ats. Stanley & Elliott, 26 " 26
ats. Starr, 25 " 38
ats. , .'....25 " 49
ats. Sterne, 20 " 43
ats. Stewart < .26 " 44
State ats. Swallow, 20 Ala. 30
ats. , 1>2 " 20
ats. Sweeney, 28 " 47
ats. Taylor, .22 " 15
ats. Thompson, 21 " 48
ats. , 25 " 41
ats.- ; , 28 " 12
ats. Thurman, 18 « 276
ats. Tims, 26 " 165
ats. Tomlin, 19 " 9
ats. Trexler, 19 " 21
ats. Tucker, ....24 " '77
ats. Underwood, 19 " 532
ats. —, 25 " 70
ats. VanDyke 22 " 57
ats. , 24 " 81
ats.- Ward, 22 " 16
ats. , 28 " 53
ats. Weaver, 18 " 293
V. -Williams, 19 " 15
ats. ^, 20 " 63
. ats. , 26 " 85
ats. —, 29 " 9
ats. Windham, 26 " 69
ats. Winter &Scisson,20 " 39
ats. Wyatt, 25 " 9
Staunton v. Simmons, 20 " 243
Steamboat Cuba v. Comm'rs
of Pilotage,.... 28 " 185
Empire v. Ala. (Toal
]\[iningCo., 29 " 690
Farmer v.McCraw, 26 " 189
Steel ats. Harwell, 17 " 372
Steele V. Adams, 21 " 534
V.Brown, 18 " 700
ats. Hopper, 18 " 828
ats. Knox's Distribu-tees,
18 " 815
ats. McTyer, 26 " 487
V. Mealing, 24 " 285
ats. Watts, 19 " 656
V. Weaver's Ex'rs,. .20 " .540
V. Wyatt's Adm'r, ... 23 " 764
ats. ,...26 " 639
Stein V. Ashby, 24 " 521
V. Burden, 19 " 715
V. ^-
, 24 " 130
ats. , 25 " 455
ats. , 27 " 104
V. , 29 " 127
V. Maj^or of Mobile, . . 17 " 234
V. ,..24 " 591
V. McArdle & Waters, 24 " 344
ats. ,25 " 561
Stephens ats. Beverly, 17 " 701
• V. Westwood, ... .20 " 275
V. ,...25 " 716
Sterling's Adm'rs ats. Shad-den,
23 " 518
TABLE OF CASES. XXXlll
Sterne v. The State, 20 Ala. 43
Sterns ats. Jones, 28 " 677
Stetson & Co. ats. Gold-sticker,
21 " 404
Stetts, Allen & Gill ats.
Turner, .28 " 420
Stevens ats. King, 18 " 475
ats. McKenzie, 19." 691
Stevenson V. O'llara, 27 " 362
V. Reaves, 24 " 425
Stewart V. Bradford, 26 " 410
V. Cunningham &
Rippetoe, 22 " 626
ats. Duncan & Hoop-er,
25 " 408
V. Goode&Ulrick,.29 « 476
ats. Hpuseman, 28 " 684
ats. Jones, 19 " 701
ats. Kirkland, 19 " 162
. ats. Nichols, 20 " 358
^ats. Nimmo, 21 " 682
^ ats. Powell, 17 " 719
-. V. The State, 26 " 44-
Stewart & Easton v. Doe d.
Seabury, 22 " 207
Stewart & Fontaine v. Har-grove,
23 •' 429
StewartGeorge V. Saunders,19 " 744
v.Skfeates&Co.l9 " 738
Stiff, Ex parte, 18 " 464
Stiles & Co. v.Lightfoot,.. 26 " 443
Stiuson and Wife ats. Prater ,26 " 456
Stockdale v. Riddle & -Co., . 22 " 678
ats. JVheeler, 22 •' 658
Stodder v. Cardwell, 20 " 223
V. Grant & Nickels,27 " 416
Stokes V. Jones, 18 " 734
-v. , 21 " 731
Stone V. Britton, 22 " 543
V.Hale, 17 " 557
Stoudenmeier v. Williamson,29 " 558
Stovall V. Johnson, 17 .
" 14
Stow V. Bozeman's Ex'rs,..29 " 397
Strickland v. Nance, 19 " 233
Strong V. Beroujon, 18 " 168
V. Brewer, 17 " 706
V.Gregory, -....19 " 147
Strother's Adm'r v. Butler,.17 " 733
Sturdevant ats. Williams,..27 " 598
Sturtevant ats. Minis, 18 " 359
ats. , 23 « 664
Sublett ats. Henderson,.. .21 " 626
Sullivan ats. Broadnax, 29 " 320
ats.Woolfork'sAd'r,23 " 548
Sumraerlin v. Dowdle,. . . .24 " 428
Summers ats. Powell, 17 " 647
Swallow V. The State, 20 " 30
Swan, Ex parte, 23 " 192
ats. Freeman, 22 " 106
5
Sweeney v. The State, 28 Ala. 47
Swift ats. Brantly, 24 " 390
Swilley & Riley v. Lyon &
Baker, 18 " 552
Swink's Adm'r v.Snodgrass,17 " 653
Swinney & Palmer v. Dor-man,..
25 " 4.33
Swoope ats. Huckabee, 20 " 491
Sykes ats. Foster, 23 " 796
V.Lewis, 17 " 261
Talbot ats. Simpson, 25
Taliaferro v. Lane, 23
• V. Branch Bank
Montgomery, 23
Talley's Adra'rsats. Price.. 18
Tankersley v. Childers,. . ..23
• ats. Smyth 20
V. Wedgworth,. . . .22
Tannis v. Doe d. St. Gyre,..21
Tardy v. Murry & Durand,17
ats. ,...19
Tarleton v. Goldthwaite's
Heirs, 23
Tarleton & Pollard v. John-son,
25
Tarrence ats. Barnett's Ex'r,23
Tartt ats. Barron, 18
ats. , .19
ats. Ellsworth, 26
Tarver v. Comm'rs' Court,..17
ats. —,21
ats. ,25
ats. ,29
Tate V. McCrary 21
V. Shackelford's Ad'r,.24
Tatura & Smith v. Morris,. 19
Taylor v. Br. Bk. Huntsville,21
ats. Bumgardner,. .28
ats. Burns, 23
ats. Lyde, 17
als. Morrison, 21 — -v. , 26
V. The State, 22
Teakle V. Teakle, 29
Tenison ats. Martin's Heirs,26
Thom ats. Otis & Jayne,. . .23
Thomas ats. Crabb's Adm'r,25
V. DeGraffenreid,.. .17
V. ,. . .27
V. Henderson, 27
ats. Montgomery
Man. Co., 20
Thomason ats. Coster, Rob-inson
& Co 19
v.Odum 23
Thompson ats. Comm'rs' Ct.,18
4G9
369
755
21
781
212
677
449
585
710
346
300
463
66'8
78
733
527
661
480
414
499
510
302
581
687
255
270
779
728
15
403
738
469
212
602
651
523
473
717
480
694
XXXI
V
TABLE OF CASES.
Thompson ats. Gotten, 21 xVla.
ats. ., 25 "
• V. Gates, .18 "
V. Gwynn, 24 "
^ats. Harlan, 20 "
V. Jolmsou, 19 "
ats. Kemii, 17 "
V.Lea, 28 "
ats. Loughridge,. . . 20 "
ats. Matlock, 18 "
ats. Mawhinuey &
Smith, 17 "
ats. Rose. 17 "
V. The State, 20 "
V. -, 21 "
V. , 28 "
V. , 25 "
V. Thornton, 21 "
Thompson's Adm'r v. Chris-tian,
28 "
Thorn ats. Otis, 18 "
Thornton ats. Thompson,. .21 "
Thrasher & Mitchell v. Pinck-ard's
Heirs, 23 "
Thurman v. The State,. . . .18 "
Thweatt ats. Johnson,. .. .18 "
Ticknor ats. Carriere, 26 "
Thorpe ats. Harvey and
Wife, 28 "
Tiller V. Shearer, 20 "
V. , 20 "
Tillman v. Long & Freeman,29 "
Tims v. The State, 26 "
Tomkies v. Reynolds, 17 "
Tomlin v. The State, 19 "
Toney ats. Hardy, 20 "
Toulmin ats. Johnson, 18 "
ats. Rives, 19 "
ats. , 25 "
Townes & Nooe v. Fergu-son,
20 "
Towns ats. Heydenfeldt,. ..27 "
Townsend v. Jeifries, 17 "
V. , 24 "
Townsend & Bro. v. Har-well,
18 "
Tramraell V. Simmons,. ,. .17 "
Trantham ats. Hines and
Wife, 27 "
Trapp & Hill v. Moore &
Border, 21 "
Trask ats. Alexander, 20 "
Traun ats. Wittick, 25 "
ats. , 27 "
V. , 27 "
Travis v. Morrison and
Wife 28 "
Trawick ats. Roberts, 17 "
ats. , 22 "
574
671
32
512
94
59
9
453
828
600
362
628
54
48
12
41
808
399
395
616
276
741
571
250
527
596
376
165
109
9
237
50
288
452
147
423
276
329
301
411
359
693
805
317
562
570
494
55
490
Trexler v. The State, 19 Ala.
Trickej^ ats. Nicolas, 19 "
Trippe v. Trippe, 29 "
Trulove v. Brown, 21 "
Tucker ats. Gauntt and Wife,18 "
ats. Gresham, 28 "
V. Holley, 20 " — V. Magee, 18 "
V. The State, ,24 "
Turner v. Cole, 24 "
V. Fenner, 19 "
ats. Rhodes, 21 "
V. Stetts, Allen &
Gill, 28 "
Turk ats. McCreary, ...... .29 "
Turner's Adm'r v. Dupree's
Adm'r, ,..19 "
Tnrney's Adm'r v. Morrow,26 "
Tnrrentine ats. Appleton,..19 "
Turrentine &; Freeman ats.
Cooper, 17 "
Twelves ats. Constautiue,..29 "
Tyus V. DeJarnette, 26 "
XJ.
Underwood v. The State,. .19 "
V. ,.25 "
,.27
Union Bank ats. Andrews,.21
V. Benham,. . . .23
Upson V. Raiford, 29 "
Urquhart ats. Shorter,. .. .28 "
Vanderveer ats. Pond, ....17 "
VauDyke v. The State,. . . .22 '•
V. ,....24 "
VanEppes v. Comm'rs' Ct,. . 25 "
V.Smith 21 "
Van Wagner & Yeoman v.
Chapman's Adm'r,. .. .29 "
Yanzant v. Morris, 25 "
Yardeman ats. Knight's
Adm'rs, 25 "
Yarner v. Bevil, 17 "
ats. Railroad Co. (M.
&W.) 19 "
Yasser ats. Crompton, 19 "
Yaughan v. Robinson,. .. .20 "
, 22 "
Yaughan & Hatcher v.
Holmes & West 22 "
Yincent, Ex parte, 26 "
Yinson ats. Wilkerson, 20 "
21
92
637
544
27
611
426
99
77
364
355
210
420
244
198
339
706
13
607
280
532
70
31
576
143
188
360
426
57
81
460
317
172
285
262
286
185
259
229
519
593
145
131
TABLE OF CASES. XXXT
Waddell v. Glassell, 18 Ala.
Wadsworth ats. Pond, 24 "
Wainwright & Twelves v.
Sanders, 20 "
Waldea V. Smith, 29 "
Waldrou and Wife ats.
Quarles, 20 "
Waldron, Isley & Co. v.
Simmons, 28 "
Waldrum and Wife ats.
Cheek, -. 2.5 "
Walker v. Blassingame,. . .17 "
V. Boiling, 22' "
V. Chapman, 22 "
ats. Chenault's Ad'rs,22 "
ats. Clay & Clay, ... 21 "
, Ex parte, 25 "
v.Fenner, 20 "
V. , 28 "
ats. Fields, 17
ats. , 23
V. Forbes, .25
V. Goodman & Mitch-ell,
21
ats. ,. . . .29
V. Greene, 22
V. Jones, 23
V. Lauderdale, 17
ats. McGonegal, .... 23
ats. McGrew & Har-ris,
17
ats. Mcintosh, 17
V. Palmer, 24
ats. Read, 18
ats. Piowland, 18
ats. Simmons and
Wife, 18
V. Walker, 17
V. , 26
Walker 's Adm'rs ats. Jolley,26
Walker and Wife ats. Mc-
Culloughand Wife,.. .20
V. Smith, 28
Wall ats. Hinson, 20
Wallace ats. Crump, 27
V. Hall's Heirs, 19
ats. Hall and Wife,25
V. Nelson, 28
Wallace & Lewis ats.
. Peck& Clark 19
Waller v. Campbell, 25
ats. Kimbro, 21
Wallis ats. Moore, 18
Walshe & Emanuel ats. Sav-age
& Darrington,. . . .24
ats. ;^-,26
Walthall ats. Cook,. . ., 20
561
531
602
417
217
629
152
810
294
116
275
797
81
192
367
80
155
139
647
444
679
448
359
361
fe24
20
358
323
749
664
396
262
690
389
569
298
277
367
438
282
219
544
376
458
293
619
334
Walton V. Bonham, 24
Ward ats. Bigelow, 29
v.The State, 22
V. , 28
V.Winston & Co.,...20
Ware ats. Bryan, 20
V. Cartledge, 24
V. Clowncy, 24
V. Coles, 24
ats. Gilmer, 19
V. Jordan, 21
V. Roberson, 18
Waring ats. Lang's Heirs, .17
ats. . .25
V. Moseley, 22
Waring & Co. v. Gilbert &
Bro., 25
ats. Ilaynie,. . .29
Waters ats. Sallee, 17
V. Spencer, 22
Watkins v. Gaston, 17
ats. Melton, 24
Watson V. Hutto, 27
ats. PauUing, 26
Watson & Eidson ats. Paul-ding
21
Watts V. Gayle & Bower,. .20
V. Steele, 19
Weatherford v. Weather-ford,
20
Weathers ats. Sasnett, . . . .21
V. Spears, 27
Weaver ats. Chapman,. . . .19
V. Jones, 24
ats. The State, 18
Weaver's Ex'rs ats. Steele,20
ats. Weaver's
Creditors, 20
,23
Webb ats. Cave, 22
ats. Cook & Hardy, ... 18
ats. Plank-Road Co.,. .27
V. Webb's Heirs,. . . .29
Wedgworth ats. Tankersly,22
Weed & Co. ats. Lampley,27
Weemsats. Bryan and Wife,25
ats. ,.29
,21
Weeks v. Love, 19
Weir V.Clayton 19
Weir & Tate ats. Hudson &
Stokes, 29
Weisinger ats. Poacher,. . .20
Wells V. Bransford, 28
ats. McHenry, 28
Welsh ats. Bean, 17
^ats. Edmondson,. . .27
ats. Pope, 18
Wesson v. Crook, 24
Ala. 513
« 471
16
" 53
" 167
« 687
" 622
" 707
" 446
" 252
" 837
" 105
« 145
" 625
" 667
« 295
" 263
" 482
" 460
" 664
" 433
" 513
" 205
" 279
" 817
" 656
'• 548
" 673
" 455
" 626
" 420
" 293
" 540
" 557
" 789
" 583
" 810
" 618
" 588
" 677
" 621
" 195
" 423
" 302
" 25
« 132
" 294
" 102
" 200
" 451
'•• 770
" 578
" 631
'• 4TS
XXXVl TABLE OF CASES.
West ats. Brantley,. 27 Ala. 542
V. Foreman 21 -^ 400
V. Hendrix 28 " 22G
V. Kelly's Ex'rs 19 " 353
"\Yest, Oliver k, Co. v. Siiod-grass
17 " 549
Westfeldt ats. Winston,... 22 " 7G0
Westwood ats. Stephens... 20 " 2.5
ats. ,..25 " 71G
Wheatv. Wheat's Ex'rs,.. 24 " 429
Wheeler V. Poinuls, 24 " 472
V. Stockdale 22 " 65S
White v. Adkins 18 " 636
V. Banks,. 21 " 705
-v. Blount &Skeltou.22 " 697
V.Ellis, 25 « 540
V. Governor, 18 " 767
-. ats. Owens,. '^ 28 " 413
ats. Shaw, 28 " 637
V. Word, 22 " 442
V. Wyley, 17 " 167
AYhitehead v. BVowri, 18 " G82
, Ex parte, 23 " 93
Whiteside V. Jennings,. ,. .19 " 784
Whitaeld ats. Cox's Adm'r,18 " 738
Whiting ats. Holman, 19 " 703
Whitlock V. Whitlock,. . . .25 " 543
Whitman ats. Ilarrell, 19 " 135
ats. , 20 " 519
Whitman & Harrison ats.
Duramns, 26 " 326
Whitsett, Garner k, Go. v.
Slater, 23 " 626
Whitten ats. Humphrey,. .17 " 30
Whitworth and Wife v.
Hart, 22 " 343
Wier ats. Hatton, 19 " 127
Wightman ats. Karsn8r,..20 " 446
Wiley ats. Smith, 19 " 217
: V. Wiley, 27 " 704
Wiley, Banks ik Co. ats.
Beeson, 28 " 575
V. Knight, 27 " 336
Wilkerson v. Vinson, 20 " 131
Wilkins ats. Judge, 19 " 765
Wilkinson ats. Doe d.
Hnghes, 21 " 296
ats. McBryde's Heirs,.29 " 662
V. Moseley 18 " 288
ats. , 24 " 411
V. Murphy, 20 " 104
Williams ats. Agee, 27 " 644
V. Barnes, 28 " 613
• ats. Boring, 17 " 510
V. Cawley, 18 " 206
• V. Crum, 27 " 468
ats. , 29 " 446
V. Fitzpatrick. 20 " 791
V. Graves, 17 " G2
Williams ats. Hamilton,. . .26 Ala.
V.Hart, 17 "
ats. Langdon, 22 "
ats. Lindsay, 17 "
ats. Martin, 18 "
V. Maull, 20 '•'
ats. May & Tindall,17 "
ats. MaA^nard, 17 "
ats. Maj's, 27 "
V. McConico, 25 "
V. 27 "
V. :\rcCurdy & Ald-rick
22 "
ats. McGar, 26 "
ats. Nelms 18 "
ats. Porter, 22 "
V. Simmons, 22 "
ats. ; 27 "-
V.Sims 22 "
V. The State 19 "
V. , 20 "
V. , 26 "
V. , 29 "
V. Sturdevant, 27
Williams and Wife v. Gun-ter,
28
v. Harrison,. .19
Williamson ats. Stouden-meier,
29
Williamson's Adm'r ats.
Gaffney, 21
Williamson and Wife v.
Mason 18
V. , 23
Williamson & Arrington v.
Howell, 17
Willis V. Cadenhead 28
Willis & Co. V. P. & M.
Bank, 19
Wilson V. Beard, 19
ats. Brj'an, 27
. x. Calvert, IS
V. Cantr ell, 19
ats. Gibson, ....... 18
ats. Griffin, Raj'field
& Griffin,. 19
V . Judge Pike Co
.
Court, 18
V. Knight, 18
ats. Macliu.. ,, 21
V. Maria, 21
ats. O'Neal, 21
V. Sheppard, 28
V.Wilson, 18
Wilson and Wife v. Crook, 17
Wimberly ats. Cook, 24
Windham ats. Collier's Ad'r.27
^ V. The State, 26
Winn V. Freele, 19
527
102
681
229
190
721
23
676
267
538
572
696
469
650
525
425
507
512
15
63
85
9
598
681
277
558
112
87
488
830
472
141
629
208
274
G42
63
7o7
129
670
359'
288
623
176
59
486
291
69
171
TABLE OF CASES. XXXVll
Winston ats. McKinley,. . .19 .
_ V. Westfeldt, 22
Winston & Co. ats. Ward, ..20
Winter ats. Mayor of We'-
tunipka, 29
V. Phelan, 27
Winter & Scisson v. The
State, 20
Wiswal! V. KnevalSjIIall &
Townsend, 18
Witlierington v. Brantley,. .18
ats. Gallagher,29
Wittick V. Traun, 25
V. , 27
ats. , 27
Wolfe ats. Cuthbcrt, 19
V. Parharn, 18
Wood V. Russell, 22
ats. Woodward, 19
"VVoodall ats. Pennington,. .17
Wooding ats. Smith, 20
Woodward v. Donall}^ 27
V. Purdy, 20
V. Wood, 19
Wooley ats. Bird, 23
Woolfork's Adrn'r v. Sul-livan,
23
Woosley v. E,ailroad Co.
(M. &C.), 28
Wooten's Ex'rs ats. Pitts,. .24
Vford ats. White, ..22
Worthy v. Lyon, 18
Worthy, Brown & Co. v.
Patterson, 20
Wray v.Wray, 19
Wray's Adm'rs v. Furniss, 27
Wright ats. Atwood's Ad'r,29
^v. Boiling, 27
V. Clough, 17
. -v. Gray, 20
V.Lewis, 18
Wa. 301
7G0
167
G51
C49
39
65
197
420
317
562
570
373
441
645
213
685
324
198
379
213
717
548
536
474
442
784
172
522
471
346
259
490
363
194
Wright V. Lindsay, 20
Wyatt ats. Michan and Wife,21
V. The State, 25
Wyatt's AdniT V. Rambo,. .29
ats. Steele,..23
V. . . .26
Wyley ats. Carr's Ex'r,. . . .23
ats. White 17
Ala. 428
" 8U
9
" 510
" 764
" 639
" 821
" 167
Yarborough v. Hudson,. . .19
ats. Pickens,. . .26
Yeldell ats.'Peake, 17
Yielding ats. Foust, 28
Yiend ats. Bay Road Co... .29
Yeoman & VanWagner ats.
Chapman's Adm'r, 29
Yoe ats. Garnett, 17
Younge v. Broxson, 23
ats. Godwin, 22
Young V. Davis, 20 — v.FuUer, 29
ats. Hudson, 25 — ^ats. Hughes, 25
ats. Kennedy & Mer-ritt,
25
ats. McCIellan, 17
Young & Hall v. Bryant, ... 21
Youugblood ats. Frederick,! 9
Younge v. HoUey, 27
Z.
Zackowski v. Jones, 20
Zeigler & Hall v. David,. . .23
Zimmerman ats. Euber,. . ..21
V. ,. . ..29
Zunts ats. Sprague & Win-ston,
.
18
653
417
636
658
325
172
74
684
553
l.ol
464
376
483
563
4-98
264
680
203
189
127
488
379
382
' DOUBTED, EXPLAINED, AND CHANGED BY STATUTE.
(Note, that this table does not iiiclnde cases overruled by the Code, except
where the statute has received a judicial construction.)
Adams v. BrougJiton, 13 Ala. 731, overruled, as to second point, bv McCoy v.
Odom, 20 Ala. 502.
Andrew's Heirs v. Brouii's Adm'r, 21 Ala. 4p7, corrected and limited, as to
third point, by Lang's Heirs v. JVaring, 25 Ala. G2G.
Antonez v. The State, 26 Ala. 81, changed by statute, Session Acts 1855-6, p. 52.
Branch Bank at Montgomery v. Parker, 5 Ala. 731, overruled, as to third point,
by Stanley cV Elliott «. The State, 26 Ala. 26.
Broivnv. Lang, 14 Ala. 719, corrected, as to principle asserted in head-note.
b}' Lang v. Broicn, 21 Ala. 179.
Campbell, Ex parte, 20 Ala. 89, as to fifth point, changed b}' Code, | 3673.
Catteriin v. Hardy, 10 Ala. 511, overruled, as to second point, by McCoy v.
Odom, 20 Ala. 502.
Connoley v. Cheesborough, 21 Ala. 166, overruled, as to second point, by Sands cV
Co. V. Mattheivs, Finley ^- Co., 27 Ala. 399.
Cook ty Scott V. Parham, 24 Ala. 21, overruled in eff"ect, as to first point, by
Stanley fy Elliott v. The State, 26 Ala. 26.
Coopwood V. Wallace, 12 Ala. 790, overruled, as to second point, by Jonss v.
Daivson, 19- Ala. 672.
Cothran v. Weir, 3 Ala. 24, overruled by Crabtree v. Cliatt. 22 Ala. 181.
Cox V. Davis, 17 Ala. 714, overruled, as to fourth point, by Raids t. Doe d.
Kennedy, 23 Ala. 240.
Doe d. Nickels v. Haskins,!^ Ala. 61 9, overruled, as to first i^oint, bv Raids v. Doe d.
Kennedy, 23 Ala. 240.
Floyd V. Fountain, 17 Ala. 700, changed by Code, § 2354.
Freeman cy Warren v. Jordan, 17 Ala. 500, corrected, as to first head-note, by
Spoor V. Phillips, 27 Ala. 193.
Goodman v. Munks, 8 Porter, 84, overruled, as to last point, bv Jones v. Jones,
18 Ala. 248.
Henry and Wife v. Thorpe, 14 Ala. 103, overruled, as to second point, by
Rawls V. Doe d. Kennedy, 23 Ala. 240.
Hogan V. Branch Bank at Decatur, 10 Ala. 485, overruled, as to second point,
by Griffin v. State Bank, 17 Ala. 258.
xl CASES OVERRULED.
Holman's Heirs v. Bank of Norfolk, 12 Ala. 3C9, overruled, as to third point, by
Burns v. Taylor, 23 Ala. 25.5.
Hopper V. Steele, 18 Ala. 828, withdrawn by the court ; see note to errata, i>. 8
of same volume.
Hou-ard v. Bugbee, 2;") Ala. 548, changed b}" statute. Session Acts -1855-6, p. 33.
Lake v. Gilchrist, 7 Ala. 955, overruled, as to last point, by Saltmarsh v. Bower
cy Co., 22 Ala. 221.
Lyde v. Taylor, 17 Ala. 270, overruled, as to the third point, bj^ McCoy v. Odom,
20 Ala. 502.
Massey v. Steele, 11 Ala. 3-10, corrected and limited, as to principle asserted in
first head-note, by Vaughan v. Robinson, 22 Ala. 519.
Mayor of Mobile v. Yiiille, 3 Ala. 137, overruled, as to third point, by Mayor
of Huntsville v. Phelps, 27 xVla. 55.
Moore v. Hubbard, 4 Ala. 187, overruled, as to first i^oint, bj' McLane ^* Plow-man
V. Riddle ^- Burt, 19 Ala. 180.
Morrow fy Nelson v. Weaver £f Froiv, 8 Ala. 288, overruled, as to second point,
by Hutchisson v. Governor, 23 Ala. 809.
OJdo Life Insurance fy Trust Co. v. Ledyard, 8 Ala. 866, corrected and limited.
as to fourth point, by Smith's Heirs v. Branch Bank at Blobile, 21 Ala. 125.
Oswitchee Co. v. Hope tV Co., 5 Ala. 629, overruled, as to first point, by Barron
V. lartt, 18 Ala. 668.
Parks V. Stonum, 8 Ala. 752, overruled, as to second point, by Wilson's Heirs v.
Wilson's Adm'r, 18 Ala. 176, and King t. Collins, 21 Ala. 363.
Price V. Steivart, 16 Ala. 40, which overruled . Savage v. Benham, 11 Ala. 49,
overruled by Thompson and Wife v. Hunt, 22 Ala. 517.
Rossett V. The State, 17 Ala. 496, as to second point, changed by statute, Session
Acts 1849-50, p. 24.
Spradling ^- Thomas v. The State, 17 Ala. 440, as to first point, changed by stat-ute,
Session Acts 1855-6, p. 29.
The State v. Hinton q- Watson, 6 Ala. 864, doubted, in Lawson ^ Swinney v.
T/ie State, 20 Ala. 65.
Trotter v. Blocker if Wife, 6 Porter, 269, overruled, as to fifth point, by Praters
Adm'r v. Darby, 24 Ala. 496.
Turner v. Fenner, 19 Ala. 345, overruled, as to first point, by 3IcCoy v. Odom,
20 Ala. 502.
Ward V. Herndon. 5 Porter, 382, overruled, as to first point, by Stanley &,• Elliot
V. The State, 26 Ala. 26.
Wyatt's Adm'r v. Steele. 26 639, overruled, as to last point, by Wyatt's Adm'r v.
Rambo, 29 Ala. 510.
P^RT FIRS
CRIIIIAL CASES.
DI&EST.
ACCOMPLICES.
1. If several persons conspire to do
an unlawful act, all are responsible for
the acts of each, if done in the prose-cution
of their common purpose ; but,
if an offense is committed by anyone
of them, from causes having no con-nection
Avith the common object, he
alone is responsible for its consequen-ces.
Fra7ik V. The State, 27 Ala. 37 ;
Stewart v. The State, 26 Ala. 44; Thomp-son
V. The State, 25 Ala. 41.
2. It is a question of the jury, in
such cases, whether the act was done
in prosecution of the original unlawful
purpose, or was independent of it,
and without previous concert. Frank
V. The State, 27 Ala. 37.
3. If A and B, by pre-concert, make
an attack on C, in which D, not being
privy to their common design, par-ticipates
; this will not be murder in
D, if death ensues from wounds in-flicted
by A or B. lb.
4. Where a priority and commiinity
of design have been established, the
acts, declarations, and conduct of any
one of the associates, in furtherance
of their common purpose, are admis-sible
evidence against the others.
Johnson v. The State, 29 Ala. 62 ; Mar-tin
and Flinn v. The State, 28 Ala. 71 ;
Stewart v. The State, 26 Ala. 44.
5. But the acts and declarations of
one man, made apart, can never be
legal evidence against another of com-plicity,
unless the community of pur-pose
is shown by other proof than
those acts and declarations. Martin
and Flinn V. The State, 28 Ala. 71; Stew-art
V. The State, 26 Ala. 44.
ADULTERY.
(Statutory Provisions : Code, §3231; Clay's Digest,
431, §3.)
I. Op the Offense.
II. Of the Indictment.
III. Of the Evidence.
I. Of the Offense.
1. Adultery and fornication are dis-tinct
offenses ; and, though they may
be charged in different counts, yet if
the indictment charges adultery in a
single count, while the evidence shows
that both the parties were unmarried,
no conviction can be had. Smitherman
V. The State, 27 Ala. 23.
II. Of the Indictment.
2. An indictment, which charges that
the defendants, a man and a woman,
"did live together in fornication," is
sufficient. Lawsonand Swinneyv. The
State, 20 Ala. 65.
III. Of the Evidence.
3. The fact of illicit connection be-tween
a man and a woman is one
which, from its very nature, can sel-dom
be directly proved, and must, in
the great majority of cases, be inferred
from circumstances, the weight and
conclusiveness of which vary accord-ing
to the situation and character of
the parties, the habits of society, and
other incidental circumstances. Law-sonand
Sivinneyv. The State, 20 Ala. 65.
ADULTERY.—AFFIDAVIT. [Part I.
4. Evidence of acts anterior to the
i:)eriod covered by the indictment, al-thongh
inadmissible as independent
testimonj', and barred as an oft'ense by
the statute of limitations, are compe-tent
evidence in connection 'with, and
in explanation of, other acts of a simi-lar
character within the period covered
by the indictment, lb.
5. Acts of indecent familiaritj' within
the period covered by the indictment,
cannot be explained by proof of the
subsequent illicit intercourse of the
parties ; but, when they have been
explained by previous acts of illicit
intercourse, then proof of the subse-quent
illicit intercourse becomes cor-roborative,
or cumulative evidence.
and is admissible. lb.
6. Where the parties are jointly in-dicted
and tried, the confessions of
the woman are admissible evidence
against herself ; but it is the duty of
the court, to caution the jury that such
confessions can operate only against
the party making them, and that the
other defendant cannot be convicted,
except upon evidence aliunde sufficient
to establish his guilt. lb.
1. The admission of the woman, that
her co-defendant was the father of a
bastard child, of which she_was deliv-ered
more than twelve months after
the finding' of the indictment, is ad-missible
evidence against her ; its
relevancy being shown, by connecting
it with other acts occurring before
and within the period covered by the
indictment. lb.
8. The refusal of the man to pay a
physician for his professional services
rendered during the confinement of
the Avoman, and his declaration that
the child was not his, are not compe-tent
evidence for him, when uncon-nected
with any conversation or ad-mission
offered against him. lb.
9. A conversation carried on in the
presence of the woman, and in the
room where she was lying, a few min-utes
after she had been delivered of a
child, between her mother and the
attending physician, as to the person
to whom the latter should look for
payment for his professional services,
in which conversation she took no
part, is not admissible evidence against
her, as tending to show her acquies-cence
in the truthof their statements. J6.
AFFIDAVIT.
1. An affidavit, charging affiant's be-lief
that the accused " was about to
persuade, and trying to persuade, two
of his (affiant's) hired slaves to leave
his premises," though informal, is sub-stantially
sufficient to justify a warrant
against the accused, under the statute
(Clay's Digest, 419, §15) forbidding
anj" person to "aid any negro or other
slave to run away or depart from his
master's service. Crosby v. Hawthorn,
25 Ala. 221.
2. An affidavit by a married woman,
that " she is afraid her husband will
beat, wound, maim, or do her some
bodily hurt," is not sufficient to au-thorize
the husband's arrest ; and if
the justice's warrant appears on its
face to be predicated on sitch an affi-davit,
it furnishes no protection to the
officer executing it. Nolesv. The State.
24 Ala. 672.
3. An affidavit, charging that certain
goods, of the value of thirty dollars,
the property of certain persons named
in the affidavit, had been feloniously
stolen by some person or persons un-known
to affiant, and that, from proba-ble
cause, he suspected that said goods
were concealed in a trunk belonging
to the plaintiff" and another, does not
amount to a charge of larceny if the
plaintiff fails to account satisfactorily
for his possession. Field v. Ireland.
21 Ala. 240.
4. But it is equivalent to a charge of
knowingl}'' concealing stolen goods,
although it may not contain the statu-tory
requisites necessary to consti-tute
that offense, and authorizes the
justice to issue his warrant for the
arrest of the person in whose posses-sion
the goods are alleged to be. Jb.
5. An affidavit, which charges that
the accused " has feloniously taken,
stolen, and carried away from the
possession of C, where she was placed
by affiant, a negro woman named
Eliza, valued at $450, and that she is
now in the possession of" the acciised,
is sufficiently descriptive of an offense
against the criminal laws of the coun-try
to justif}' the magistrate in causing
the accused to be apprehended and
brought before him. Firing v. San-ford,'
ld Ala. 605.
Pakt I.] AFFRAY.—AMENDMENTS.
AFFRAY.
(Statutory Provisiops : Code, §& 3086, 3301 ; Clay's
Digest, 413, § 8.)
I. Of the Offense.
II. Of the Indictment.
III. Of the Evidence.
IV. Of the Punishment.
I. Of the Offense.
1. A field, surrounded by a forest,
and situated one mile from any liigli-way
or other public place, does not
lose its private character by the casual
presence of three persons, sO as to make
two of them, who fight together wil-lingly,
guilty of an affray. Taylor v.
The \State, 22 Ala. 15.
2. The statute against fighting in a
public place, and using fire-arms, was
intended to create a new offense, and
attach to it a new penalty. Skains ^
Lewis V. The State, 21 Ala. 218.
II. Of the Indictment.
3. An indictment under the statute
against fighting in a public i^lace, must
be framed in reference to the statute,
and must conform to either its letter
or substance. Skains k Lewis v. The
State, 21 Ala. 218.
III. Of the Evidence.
4. When two persons are indicted
for an affray, proof that, ' several
months before the occurrence of the
affray, they had fought together, on
which occasion one had attempted to
strike the other, and said he would
kill him if he could get at him," is not
admissible evidence against the party
making the threat, when there is no
proof connecting this rencounter with
the subsequent affray, or showing that
the latter grew out of the former.
Skains ^' Lewis v. The State, 21 Ala. 218.
IV. Of the Punishment.
5. Under an indictment for an affray
as at common law, it is erroneous for
the court, by its instructions to the
jury, to take away or limit their dis-cretion
with regard to the amount of
the fine to be assessed in the event of
a conviction. Skains if Lewis v. The
State, 21 Ala. 218.
('). Tlic penalty denounced by the
statute against fighting in a public
place, cannot be infficted under a com-mon-
law indictment for an affray, lb.
AGENCY.
1. Under an indictment for selling
spirituous liquors to a slave, if the
evidence shows that the liquor was
sold, in defendants absence, by his
clerk, it is error to instruct the "^jury,
" that if the defendant had previously
sanctioned the acts of his clerk in
selling liquor to slaves under similar
orders, and if they believed that the
defendant, had he been present, would
have done as his clerk did, then they
were authorized to find him guilty."
Patterson v. The State, 21 Ala. 571.
AMENDMENTS.
1. A judgment against the defendant,
in a proceeding under the bastardy
act, may be amended at a subsequent
term, nunc pro tunc, so as to require the
annual payments to be made on the
" first Monday " of January, as the
statute directs, instead of on the "first
day" in- January. WiUia/ns v. The State.
29 Ala. 9.
2. "Where the trial and conviction
occur at the term at which the indict-ment
was found, the court may, at any
time during that term, as well after as
before conviction, cause the clerk to
endorse the indictment '-filed," to date
the endorsement according to the facts,
and sign it ; and may also cause an
entiy to be made on the minutes, that
the indictment was retm-ned into court
by the grand jury, with the day on
which it was returned. Over such
matters the court has control during
the term, and may alter, amend, or se'c
them aside, as justice mar requii-e.
Franklin v. The State, 28 Ala'. 9.
3. But the court has no power, when
an indictment is lost, to substitute a
copy on proof. Ganawat/ v. The State.
22 Ala. 772.
6 AEEEST.—ARSON.
APPEALS.
See Error axd Appeal.
[Part I.
ARREST.
1. Actual force, or a manual touch-ing
of the body, is not necessarj^ to
constitute an arrest : if the party is
within the power of the officer, and
siibmits, it is sufficient. Field v. Ire-land.
21 Ala. 240.
2. An affidavit by a married woman,
that " she is afraid her husband will
beat, wound, maim, or do her some
bodily hurt," is not sufficient to au-thorize
the husband's arrest ; and if
the justice's warrant appears on its
face to be predicated on such an affi-davit,
it furnishes no protection to the
officer executing it. Noles v. The State,
24 Ala. 672.
3. After the defendant has been ar-rested
on a criminal charge, and has
given bail for his appearance at court,
the magistrate has no authority to
cause him to be re-arrested for the
same oifense, on the supposition that
his bail is insufficient. Ingram v. Tlie
State, 27 Ala. 17.
ARREST OF JUDGMENT,
I. What will arrest Judgment.
II. What will not arrest Judgment.
I. What will arrest Judgment.
1. As a general rule, when an indict-ment
is defective on demurrer, advan-tage
may also be taken of the defect
on motion in arrest of judgment.
Francois v. The State, 20 Ala. 83.
2. If an indictment is unobjectiona-ble
on its face, no conviction can be
had imder it on proof of facts which,
if stated in it, would enable the de-fendant
to arrest the judgment. Elliott
V. The State, 26 Ala. 78.
3. Under an indictment for murder,
the failure of the verdict to ascertain
the degree, though the homicide was
committed by poison, is good cause
for arrest of judgment. Johnson v.
The State, 17 Ala. elS.
4. An indictment for, counterfeiting,
which does not state the time when
the counterfeited coin was current in
this State, is fatally defective on mo-tion
in arrest. Nicholson v. The State,
18 Ala. 529.
5. So is an indictment for an assault
with intent to murder, if it does not
state the facts which constitute the
assault. Beasley v. The State, 18 Ala.
535; Trexler v. The State, 19 Ala. 21
.
6. And an indictment for ti'ading
with a slave, which charges that the
defendant sold " to a certain slave,
whose name is to the iurors unknown."
Francois v. The State,20 Ala. 83.
7. And an indictment which, iipou
its face, charges several defendants for
several offenses committ«d by them
independently of each other. Elliott
V. The State, 26 Ala. 78.
8. And an indictment for arson, if it
does not charge the ownership of the
property burned. Martin and Flinn
V. The State, 28 Ala. 71.
9. And an indictment for the will-ful
burning of a house insured against
fire, with intent to charge or injm-e
the insurer, if it does not allege that
the house was " at the time insured
against fire." Martin and Flinn v. The
State, 29 Ala. 30.
11. What will not arrest Judgment,
10. Assessing the aggregate (instead
of the separate) value of the stolen
property, under an indictment for lar-ceny
from a store-house, is not good
cause for arresting the judgment.
Case V. The State, 26 Ala. 17.
11. The improper conduct of the
jury, after they have retired to make
up a verdict, is not available in arrest
of judgment. Brister v. The State, 26
Ala. 107; Franklin v. The State, 29 Ala. 14.
ARSON.
(Statutory Provisions : Code, §§ 3137, 3185-93.)
I. Of the Offense.
It. Of the Indictment.
II. Of the Pleadings and Evidence.
Paet I.] ARSON.—ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
I. Op the Offense.
1. To justify a conviction for the
willful burning of a house insured
against fire, with intent to charge or
injure the insiu'er, the jury must he
satisfied from the evidence that the
defendant had knowledge of the insu-rance.
Martin and Flinn v. The State,
28 Ala. 71.
II. Of the Indictment.
2. Under the Code, as at common
law, the ownership of the property
must be alleged in the indictment.
Martha V. The State, 26 Ala. 72; Martin
and Flinn v. The State, 28 Ala. 71.
3. An indictment for the willful
burning of a house insured against
fire, with intent to charge or injure
the insurer, must allege that the house
was "at the time insured against fire."
Martin and Flinn v. The State. 29 Ala.
30.
III. Of the Pleadings and Evidence.
4. The ownership of the property
burned must be proved as laid. Mar-tha
V. The State, 26 Ala. 72.
5. If the proof of the ownership
varies from the allegation, and a 7ioUe-pros.
is thereupon entered, this is no
bar to a subsequent prosecution under
another indictment, in which the own-ership
is alleged to be in a different
person ; and if the second indictment
contains several counts, in one of
which the allegation of o^vnership is
the same as in the first, and the de-fendant
pleads to the whole indictment
autrefois acquit and discontinuance, the
record of the former prosecution does
not sustain either plea. lb.
6. After the State has proved the
burning of the house as charged, and
offered evidence tending to show that
. the defendant was the person who set
fire to it, the subsequent burning of
another house belonging to the prose-cutor
is irrelevant evidence ; nor
is it made relevant by being offered
in connection with proof of defendant's
declaration, that he was not yet done
with the prosecutor ; especially, when
the declaration is shown to have been
made in a conversation, in which " no
reference was made to either of the
burnings, but the parties were speak-ing
of a civil case whicli defendant
had before tlie prosecutor as a justice
of the peace, and in which he com-plained
that the prosecutor had treated
him rascally." Brock v. The State,
26 Ala. 104.
7. The fact that the accused, soirnc
five or six months before the burning
charged in the indictment, requested,
another person (witness) to burn the
house, is admissible evidence against
him. Martin and Flinn v. The State,
28 Ala. 71.
8. Evidence showing defendant's
connection with attempts to suppress
the testimoiiy of a witness for the
prosecution, by bribing him to leave
the State, is also competent. lb.
ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
(Statutory Provisions : Code, §§ 3107-8. 3300-1 ;
Clay's Digest, 416, §31 ; lb. 441, §23.)
I. Of the Offense.
II. Of the Indictment.
III. Of the Pleadings and Evidence.
I. Of the Offense.
1. The unlawful taking and detaining
of a person, against his consent, will
support an indictment for an assault
and' battery. Long v. Rogers, 17 Ala.
540.
2. Where several persons, without
process of law, enter upon a man's
premises, for the pui-pose of searching
his negro-houses for stolen property,
and one of them commits an assault
and battery on the owner, the others
are not responsible for it, unless the
assault was committed during the
prosecution of their original unlawful
purj^ose, or within such a time after-wards
as to satisfy the jury that it was
connected therewith ; but, if the evi-dence
tends to show that their original
purpose not only extended to the
search, but contemplated the use of
force if opposed or interfered with on
the premises, a charge which assumes
that the common design was limited
to the search ought to be refused.
Thompson v. The State, 25 Ala. 41.
ASSAULT WITH INTENT, &c. [Paet I,
3. To support an indictment imder
section 3108 of the Code, the accusa-tion
must be the moving cause of the
assault : if tlie assault was committed
upon the provocation that the person
assaulted had whipped the defendant's
son, the offense would be a common
assault and battery, but not a violation
of this statute. Undenvood v. The State,
25 Ala. 70.
4. An assault and battery committed
by one slave on another is an offense.
Bohv.The State, -29 Ala. 20.
II. Op the Indictment.
5. An indictment, in the general
form prescribed